Intercepting virtual balls approaching under different gravity conditions: Evidence for spatial prediction

Marta Russo, Benedetta Cesqui, Barbara La Scaleia, Francesca Ceccarelli, Antonella Maselli, Alessandro Moscatelli, Myrka Zago, Francesco Lacquaniti, Andrea D’Avella

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To accurately time motor responses when intercepting falling balls we rely on an internal model of gravity. However, whether and how such a model is also used to estimate the spatial location of interception is still an open question. Here we addressed this issue by asking 25 participants to intercept balls projected from a fixed location 6 m in front of them and approaching along trajectories with different arrival locations, flight durations, and gravity accelerations (0g and 1g). The trajectories were displayed in an immersive virtual reality system with a wide field of view. Participants intercepted approaching balls with a racket, and they were free to choose the time and place of interception. We found that participants often achieved a better performance with 1g than 0g balls. Moreover, the interception points were distributed along the direction of a 1g path for both 1g and 0g balls. In the latter case, interceptions tended to cluster on the upper half of the racket, indicating that participants aimed at a lower position than the actual 0g path. These results suggest that an internal model of gravity was probably used in predicting the interception locations. However, we found that the difference in performance between 1g and 0g balls was modulated by flight duration, the difference being larger for faster balls. In addition, the number of peaks in the hand speed profiles increased with flight duration, suggesting that visual information was used to adjust the motor response, correcting the prediction to some extent. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Here we show that an internal model of gravity plays a key role in predicting where to intercept a fast-moving target. Participants also assumed an accelerated motion when intercepting balls approaching in a virtual environment at constant velocity. We also show that the role of visual information in guiding interceptive movement increases when more time is available.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2421-2434
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Neurophysiology
Volume118
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 17 2017

Fingerprint

Gravitation
User-Computer Interface
Hand

Keywords

  • Gravity
  • Interception
  • Internal model
  • Virtual reality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Physiology

Cite this

Intercepting virtual balls approaching under different gravity conditions : Evidence for spatial prediction. / Russo, Marta; Cesqui, Benedetta; La Scaleia, Barbara; Ceccarelli, Francesca; Maselli, Antonella; Moscatelli, Alessandro; Zago, Myrka; Lacquaniti, Francesco; D’Avella, Andrea.

In: Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol. 118, No. 4, 17.10.2017, p. 2421-2434.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1e9cd7e05fe748798517ab017d68903c,
title = "Intercepting virtual balls approaching under different gravity conditions: Evidence for spatial prediction",
abstract = "To accurately time motor responses when intercepting falling balls we rely on an internal model of gravity. However, whether and how such a model is also used to estimate the spatial location of interception is still an open question. Here we addressed this issue by asking 25 participants to intercept balls projected from a fixed location 6 m in front of them and approaching along trajectories with different arrival locations, flight durations, and gravity accelerations (0g and 1g). The trajectories were displayed in an immersive virtual reality system with a wide field of view. Participants intercepted approaching balls with a racket, and they were free to choose the time and place of interception. We found that participants often achieved a better performance with 1g than 0g balls. Moreover, the interception points were distributed along the direction of a 1g path for both 1g and 0g balls. In the latter case, interceptions tended to cluster on the upper half of the racket, indicating that participants aimed at a lower position than the actual 0g path. These results suggest that an internal model of gravity was probably used in predicting the interception locations. However, we found that the difference in performance between 1g and 0g balls was modulated by flight duration, the difference being larger for faster balls. In addition, the number of peaks in the hand speed profiles increased with flight duration, suggesting that visual information was used to adjust the motor response, correcting the prediction to some extent. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Here we show that an internal model of gravity plays a key role in predicting where to intercept a fast-moving target. Participants also assumed an accelerated motion when intercepting balls approaching in a virtual environment at constant velocity. We also show that the role of visual information in guiding interceptive movement increases when more time is available.",
keywords = "Gravity, Interception, Internal model, Virtual reality",
author = "Marta Russo and Benedetta Cesqui and {La Scaleia}, Barbara and Francesca Ceccarelli and Antonella Maselli and Alessandro Moscatelli and Myrka Zago and Francesco Lacquaniti and Andrea D’Avella",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1152/jn.00025.2017",
language = "English",
volume = "118",
pages = "2421--2434",
journal = "Journal of Neurophysiology",
issn = "0022-3077",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intercepting virtual balls approaching under different gravity conditions

T2 - Evidence for spatial prediction

AU - Russo, Marta

AU - Cesqui, Benedetta

AU - La Scaleia, Barbara

AU - Ceccarelli, Francesca

AU - Maselli, Antonella

AU - Moscatelli, Alessandro

AU - Zago, Myrka

AU - Lacquaniti, Francesco

AU - D’Avella, Andrea

PY - 2017/10/17

Y1 - 2017/10/17

N2 - To accurately time motor responses when intercepting falling balls we rely on an internal model of gravity. However, whether and how such a model is also used to estimate the spatial location of interception is still an open question. Here we addressed this issue by asking 25 participants to intercept balls projected from a fixed location 6 m in front of them and approaching along trajectories with different arrival locations, flight durations, and gravity accelerations (0g and 1g). The trajectories were displayed in an immersive virtual reality system with a wide field of view. Participants intercepted approaching balls with a racket, and they were free to choose the time and place of interception. We found that participants often achieved a better performance with 1g than 0g balls. Moreover, the interception points were distributed along the direction of a 1g path for both 1g and 0g balls. In the latter case, interceptions tended to cluster on the upper half of the racket, indicating that participants aimed at a lower position than the actual 0g path. These results suggest that an internal model of gravity was probably used in predicting the interception locations. However, we found that the difference in performance between 1g and 0g balls was modulated by flight duration, the difference being larger for faster balls. In addition, the number of peaks in the hand speed profiles increased with flight duration, suggesting that visual information was used to adjust the motor response, correcting the prediction to some extent. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Here we show that an internal model of gravity plays a key role in predicting where to intercept a fast-moving target. Participants also assumed an accelerated motion when intercepting balls approaching in a virtual environment at constant velocity. We also show that the role of visual information in guiding interceptive movement increases when more time is available.

AB - To accurately time motor responses when intercepting falling balls we rely on an internal model of gravity. However, whether and how such a model is also used to estimate the spatial location of interception is still an open question. Here we addressed this issue by asking 25 participants to intercept balls projected from a fixed location 6 m in front of them and approaching along trajectories with different arrival locations, flight durations, and gravity accelerations (0g and 1g). The trajectories were displayed in an immersive virtual reality system with a wide field of view. Participants intercepted approaching balls with a racket, and they were free to choose the time and place of interception. We found that participants often achieved a better performance with 1g than 0g balls. Moreover, the interception points were distributed along the direction of a 1g path for both 1g and 0g balls. In the latter case, interceptions tended to cluster on the upper half of the racket, indicating that participants aimed at a lower position than the actual 0g path. These results suggest that an internal model of gravity was probably used in predicting the interception locations. However, we found that the difference in performance between 1g and 0g balls was modulated by flight duration, the difference being larger for faster balls. In addition, the number of peaks in the hand speed profiles increased with flight duration, suggesting that visual information was used to adjust the motor response, correcting the prediction to some extent. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Here we show that an internal model of gravity plays a key role in predicting where to intercept a fast-moving target. Participants also assumed an accelerated motion when intercepting balls approaching in a virtual environment at constant velocity. We also show that the role of visual information in guiding interceptive movement increases when more time is available.

KW - Gravity

KW - Interception

KW - Internal model

KW - Virtual reality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032009165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032009165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/jn.00025.2017

DO - 10.1152/jn.00025.2017

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85032009165

VL - 118

SP - 2421

EP - 2434

JO - Journal of Neurophysiology

JF - Journal of Neurophysiology

SN - 0022-3077

IS - 4

ER -