International Consensus Based Review and Recommendations for Minimum Reporting Standards in Research on Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (Version 2020)

tVNS-ConsensusGroup, A.D. Farmer, A. Strzelczyk, A. Finisguerra, A.V. Gourine, A. Gharabaghi, A. Hasan, A.M. Burger, A.M. Jaramillo, A. Mertens, A. Majid, B. Verkuil, B.W. Badran, C. Ventura-Bort, C. Gaul, C. Beste, C.M. Warren, D.S. Quintana, D. Hämmerer, E. FreriE. Frangos, E. Tobaldini, E. Kaniusas, F. Rosenow, F. Capone, F. Panetsos, G.L. Ackland, G. Kaithwas, G.H. O'Leary, H. Genheimer, H.I.L. Jacobs, I. Van Diest, J. Schoenen, J. Redgrave, J. Fang, J. Deuchars, J.C. Széles, J.F. Thayer, K. More, K. Vonck, L. Steenbergen, L.C. Vianna, L.M. McTeague, M. Ludwig, M.G. Veldhuizen, M. De Couck, M. Casazza, M. Keute, M. Bikson, M. Andreatta, N. Montano, Niels Hansen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Given its non-invasive nature, there is increasing interest in the use of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) across basic, translational and clinical research. Contemporaneously, tVNS can be achieved by stimulating either the auricular branch or the cervical bundle of the vagus nerve, referred to as transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation(VNS) and transcutaneous cervical VNS, respectively. In order to advance the field in a systematic manner, studies using these technologies need to adequately report sufficient methodological detail to enable comparison of results between studies, replication of studies, as well as enhancing study participant safety. We systematically reviewed the existing tVNS literature to evaluate current reporting practices. Based on this review, and consensus among participating authors, we propose a set of minimal reporting items to guide future tVNS studies. The suggested items address specific technical aspects of the device and stimulation parameters. We also cover general recommendations including inclusion and exclusion criteria for participants, outcome parameters and the detailed reporting of side effects. Furthermore, we review strategies used to identify the optimal stimulation parameters for a given research setting and summarize ongoing developments in animal research with potential implications for the application of tVNS in humans. Finally, we discuss the potential of tVNS in future research as well as the associated challenges across several disciplines in research and clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish
Article number568051
JournalFrontiers in Human Neuroscience
Volume14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • guidelines & recommendations
  • minimum reporting standards
  • transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation
  • transcutaneous cervical vagus nerve stimulation
  • transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation
  • Alzheimer disease
  • attention deficit disorder
  • autism
  • cerebrovascular accident
  • clinical practice
  • clinical research
  • cognitive defect
  • consensus development
  • depression
  • drug resistant epilepsy
  • human
  • information processing
  • ischemic heart disease
  • medical research
  • methodology
  • motor dysfunction
  • non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus
  • non invasive procedure
  • outcome assessment
  • patient safety
  • patient selection
  • practice guideline
  • Review
  • schizophrenia
  • systematic review
  • technology
  • tinnitus
  • transformed migraine
  • translational research
  • treatment outcome
  • vagus nerve
  • vagus nerve stimulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International Consensus Based Review and Recommendations for Minimum Reporting Standards in Research on Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (Version 2020)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this