International multidisciplinary expert panel consensus on breast reconstruction and radiotherapy

M. B. Nava, J. R. Benson, W. Audretsch, P. Blondeel, G. Catanuto, M. W. Clemens, P. G. Cordeiro, R. De Vita, D. C. Hammond, J. Jassem, L. Lozza, R. Orecchia, A. L. Pusic, A. Rancati, M. Rezai, G. Scaperrotta, A. Spano, Z. E. Winters, N. Rocco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Conflicting evidence challenges clinical decision-making when breast reconstruction is considered in the context of radiotherapy. Current literature was evaluated and key statements on topical issues were generated and discussed by an expert panel at the International Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Meeting in Milan 2017. Methods: Studies on radiotherapy and breast reconstruction (1985 to September 2017) were screened using MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL. The literature review yielded 30 controversial key questions. A set of key statements was derived and the highest levels of clinical evidence (LoE) for each of these were summarized. Nineteen panellists convened for dedicated discussions at the International Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Meeting to express agreement, disagreement or abstention for the generated key statements. Results: The literature review identified 1522 peer-reviewed publications. A list of 22 key statements was produced, with the highest LoE recorded for each statement. These ranged from II to IV, with most statements (11 of 22, 50 per cent) supported by LoE III. There was full consensus for nine (41 per cent) of the 22 key statements, and more than 75 per cent agreement was reached for half (11 of 22). Conclusion: Poor evidence exists on which to base patient-informed consent. Low-quality studies are conflicting with wide-ranging treatment options, precluding expert consensus regarding optimal type and timing of breast reconstruction in the context of radiotherapy. There is a need for high-quality evidence from prospective registries and randomized trials in this field.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1327-1340
Number of pages14
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
Volume106
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Mammaplasty
Radiotherapy
Breast
Informed Consent
MEDLINE
Registries
Publications
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Nava, M. B., Benson, J. R., Audretsch, W., Blondeel, P., Catanuto, G., Clemens, M. W., ... Rocco, N. (2019). International multidisciplinary expert panel consensus on breast reconstruction and radiotherapy. British Journal of Surgery, 106(10), 1327-1340. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11256

International multidisciplinary expert panel consensus on breast reconstruction and radiotherapy. / Nava, M. B.; Benson, J. R.; Audretsch, W.; Blondeel, P.; Catanuto, G.; Clemens, M. W.; Cordeiro, P. G.; De Vita, R.; Hammond, D. C.; Jassem, J.; Lozza, L.; Orecchia, R.; Pusic, A. L.; Rancati, A.; Rezai, M.; Scaperrotta, G.; Spano, A.; Winters, Z. E.; Rocco, N.

In: British Journal of Surgery, Vol. 106, No. 10, 01.01.2019, p. 1327-1340.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nava, MB, Benson, JR, Audretsch, W, Blondeel, P, Catanuto, G, Clemens, MW, Cordeiro, PG, De Vita, R, Hammond, DC, Jassem, J, Lozza, L, Orecchia, R, Pusic, AL, Rancati, A, Rezai, M, Scaperrotta, G, Spano, A, Winters, ZE & Rocco, N 2019, 'International multidisciplinary expert panel consensus on breast reconstruction and radiotherapy', British Journal of Surgery, vol. 106, no. 10, pp. 1327-1340. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11256
Nava MB, Benson JR, Audretsch W, Blondeel P, Catanuto G, Clemens MW et al. International multidisciplinary expert panel consensus on breast reconstruction and radiotherapy. British Journal of Surgery. 2019 Jan 1;106(10):1327-1340. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11256
Nava, M. B. ; Benson, J. R. ; Audretsch, W. ; Blondeel, P. ; Catanuto, G. ; Clemens, M. W. ; Cordeiro, P. G. ; De Vita, R. ; Hammond, D. C. ; Jassem, J. ; Lozza, L. ; Orecchia, R. ; Pusic, A. L. ; Rancati, A. ; Rezai, M. ; Scaperrotta, G. ; Spano, A. ; Winters, Z. E. ; Rocco, N. / International multidisciplinary expert panel consensus on breast reconstruction and radiotherapy. In: British Journal of Surgery. 2019 ; Vol. 106, No. 10. pp. 1327-1340.
@article{acdfaec730cc4fbfa94337575420faa0,
title = "International multidisciplinary expert panel consensus on breast reconstruction and radiotherapy",
abstract = "Background: Conflicting evidence challenges clinical decision-making when breast reconstruction is considered in the context of radiotherapy. Current literature was evaluated and key statements on topical issues were generated and discussed by an expert panel at the International Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Meeting in Milan 2017. Methods: Studies on radiotherapy and breast reconstruction (1985 to September 2017) were screened using MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL. The literature review yielded 30 controversial key questions. A set of key statements was derived and the highest levels of clinical evidence (LoE) for each of these were summarized. Nineteen panellists convened for dedicated discussions at the International Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Meeting to express agreement, disagreement or abstention for the generated key statements. Results: The literature review identified 1522 peer-reviewed publications. A list of 22 key statements was produced, with the highest LoE recorded for each statement. These ranged from II to IV, with most statements (11 of 22, 50 per cent) supported by LoE III. There was full consensus for nine (41 per cent) of the 22 key statements, and more than 75 per cent agreement was reached for half (11 of 22). Conclusion: Poor evidence exists on which to base patient-informed consent. Low-quality studies are conflicting with wide-ranging treatment options, precluding expert consensus regarding optimal type and timing of breast reconstruction in the context of radiotherapy. There is a need for high-quality evidence from prospective registries and randomized trials in this field.",
author = "Nava, {M. B.} and Benson, {J. R.} and W. Audretsch and P. Blondeel and G. Catanuto and Clemens, {M. W.} and Cordeiro, {P. G.} and {De Vita}, R. and Hammond, {D. C.} and J. Jassem and L. Lozza and R. Orecchia and Pusic, {A. L.} and A. Rancati and M. Rezai and G. Scaperrotta and A. Spano and Winters, {Z. E.} and N. Rocco",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/bjs.11256",
language = "English",
volume = "106",
pages = "1327--1340",
journal = "British Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0007-1323",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - International multidisciplinary expert panel consensus on breast reconstruction and radiotherapy

AU - Nava, M. B.

AU - Benson, J. R.

AU - Audretsch, W.

AU - Blondeel, P.

AU - Catanuto, G.

AU - Clemens, M. W.

AU - Cordeiro, P. G.

AU - De Vita, R.

AU - Hammond, D. C.

AU - Jassem, J.

AU - Lozza, L.

AU - Orecchia, R.

AU - Pusic, A. L.

AU - Rancati, A.

AU - Rezai, M.

AU - Scaperrotta, G.

AU - Spano, A.

AU - Winters, Z. E.

AU - Rocco, N.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Conflicting evidence challenges clinical decision-making when breast reconstruction is considered in the context of radiotherapy. Current literature was evaluated and key statements on topical issues were generated and discussed by an expert panel at the International Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Meeting in Milan 2017. Methods: Studies on radiotherapy and breast reconstruction (1985 to September 2017) were screened using MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL. The literature review yielded 30 controversial key questions. A set of key statements was derived and the highest levels of clinical evidence (LoE) for each of these were summarized. Nineteen panellists convened for dedicated discussions at the International Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Meeting to express agreement, disagreement or abstention for the generated key statements. Results: The literature review identified 1522 peer-reviewed publications. A list of 22 key statements was produced, with the highest LoE recorded for each statement. These ranged from II to IV, with most statements (11 of 22, 50 per cent) supported by LoE III. There was full consensus for nine (41 per cent) of the 22 key statements, and more than 75 per cent agreement was reached for half (11 of 22). Conclusion: Poor evidence exists on which to base patient-informed consent. Low-quality studies are conflicting with wide-ranging treatment options, precluding expert consensus regarding optimal type and timing of breast reconstruction in the context of radiotherapy. There is a need for high-quality evidence from prospective registries and randomized trials in this field.

AB - Background: Conflicting evidence challenges clinical decision-making when breast reconstruction is considered in the context of radiotherapy. Current literature was evaluated and key statements on topical issues were generated and discussed by an expert panel at the International Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Meeting in Milan 2017. Methods: Studies on radiotherapy and breast reconstruction (1985 to September 2017) were screened using MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL. The literature review yielded 30 controversial key questions. A set of key statements was derived and the highest levels of clinical evidence (LoE) for each of these were summarized. Nineteen panellists convened for dedicated discussions at the International Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Meeting to express agreement, disagreement or abstention for the generated key statements. Results: The literature review identified 1522 peer-reviewed publications. A list of 22 key statements was produced, with the highest LoE recorded for each statement. These ranged from II to IV, with most statements (11 of 22, 50 per cent) supported by LoE III. There was full consensus for nine (41 per cent) of the 22 key statements, and more than 75 per cent agreement was reached for half (11 of 22). Conclusion: Poor evidence exists on which to base patient-informed consent. Low-quality studies are conflicting with wide-ranging treatment options, precluding expert consensus regarding optimal type and timing of breast reconstruction in the context of radiotherapy. There is a need for high-quality evidence from prospective registries and randomized trials in this field.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069819837&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069819837&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/bjs.11256

DO - 10.1002/bjs.11256

M3 - Article

C2 - 31318456

AN - SCOPUS:85069819837

VL - 106

SP - 1327

EP - 1340

JO - British Journal of Surgery

JF - British Journal of Surgery

SN - 0007-1323

IS - 10

ER -