International survey and surgeon’s preferences in diagnostic work-up towards treatment of anterior shoulder instability

Hanneke Weel, Wouter Tromp, Peter R. Krekel, Pietro Randelli, Michel P J van Den Bekerom, Derek F P van Deurzen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Recurrent anterior shoulder instability after surgical treatment can be caused by bony defects. Several diagnostic tools have been designed to measure the extent of these bony lesions. Currently, there is no consensus which measurement tool to use and decide which type of surgery is most appropriate. We therefore performed an evaluation of agreement in surgeons’ preference of diagnostic work-up and surgical treatment of anterior shoulder instability. Methods: An international survey was conducted amongst orthopaedic shoulder surgeons. The survey contained questions about surgeons’ experience, clinical and radiological examination and the subsequent treatment for anterior shoulder instability. Descriptive statistics were used to present the data, and percentages of responding surgeons were calculated. Results: The questionnaire was completed by 197 delegates from 46 countries. 55 % of the respondents think evidence in current literature is sufficient on diagnostic work-up for anterior shoulder instability. Anamnestic, number of dislocations was most frequently asked (by 95 % of respondents), the most frequently used test is the apprehension test (91 %). For imaging, conventional X-ray in various directions was most performed, followed by MR arthrography and plane CT scan respectively. The responding surgeons perform surgery (labrum repair or Latarjet) in 51 % of the patients. A median of 25 % glenoid bone loss was given by the respondents, as cut-off from when to perform a bony repair. Conclusion: Many different diagnostic examinations for assessing shoulder instability are used and a high variety is seen in the use of diagnostic tools. Also no consensus is seen in the use of different surgical options (arthroscopic and open procedures). This implies the need for more research on diagnostic imaging and the correlation with specific subsequent surgical treatment. Level of evidence: Survey, level of evidence IV.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Mar 14 2016

Fingerprint

Therapeutics
Arthrography
Diagnostic Imaging
Surgeons
Surveys and Questionnaires
X-Rays
Bone and Bones
Research
Orthopedic Surgeons
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Anterior instability
  • Diagnostic
  • Recurrence
  • Shoulder joint
  • Survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

International survey and surgeon’s preferences in diagnostic work-up towards treatment of anterior shoulder instability. / Weel, Hanneke; Tromp, Wouter; Krekel, Peter R.; Randelli, Pietro; van Den Bekerom, Michel P J; van Deurzen, Derek F P.

In: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 14.03.2016, p. 1-6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Weel, Hanneke ; Tromp, Wouter ; Krekel, Peter R. ; Randelli, Pietro ; van Den Bekerom, Michel P J ; van Deurzen, Derek F P. / International survey and surgeon’s preferences in diagnostic work-up towards treatment of anterior shoulder instability. In: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2016 ; pp. 1-6.
@article{53ca0e66bddf405d91b25a6419d01cf8,
title = "International survey and surgeon’s preferences in diagnostic work-up towards treatment of anterior shoulder instability",
abstract = "Purpose: Recurrent anterior shoulder instability after surgical treatment can be caused by bony defects. Several diagnostic tools have been designed to measure the extent of these bony lesions. Currently, there is no consensus which measurement tool to use and decide which type of surgery is most appropriate. We therefore performed an evaluation of agreement in surgeons’ preference of diagnostic work-up and surgical treatment of anterior shoulder instability. Methods: An international survey was conducted amongst orthopaedic shoulder surgeons. The survey contained questions about surgeons’ experience, clinical and radiological examination and the subsequent treatment for anterior shoulder instability. Descriptive statistics were used to present the data, and percentages of responding surgeons were calculated. Results: The questionnaire was completed by 197 delegates from 46 countries. 55 {\%} of the respondents think evidence in current literature is sufficient on diagnostic work-up for anterior shoulder instability. Anamnestic, number of dislocations was most frequently asked (by 95 {\%} of respondents), the most frequently used test is the apprehension test (91 {\%}). For imaging, conventional X-ray in various directions was most performed, followed by MR arthrography and plane CT scan respectively. The responding surgeons perform surgery (labrum repair or Latarjet) in 51 {\%} of the patients. A median of 25 {\%} glenoid bone loss was given by the respondents, as cut-off from when to perform a bony repair. Conclusion: Many different diagnostic examinations for assessing shoulder instability are used and a high variety is seen in the use of diagnostic tools. Also no consensus is seen in the use of different surgical options (arthroscopic and open procedures). This implies the need for more research on diagnostic imaging and the correlation with specific subsequent surgical treatment. Level of evidence: Survey, level of evidence IV.",
keywords = "Anterior instability, Diagnostic, Recurrence, Shoulder joint, Survey",
author = "Hanneke Weel and Wouter Tromp and Krekel, {Peter R.} and Pietro Randelli and {van Den Bekerom}, {Michel P J} and {van Deurzen}, {Derek F P}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1007/s00402-016-2443-7",
language = "English",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "Archiv fur orthopadische und Unfall-Chirurgie",
issn = "0936-8051",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - International survey and surgeon’s preferences in diagnostic work-up towards treatment of anterior shoulder instability

AU - Weel, Hanneke

AU - Tromp, Wouter

AU - Krekel, Peter R.

AU - Randelli, Pietro

AU - van Den Bekerom, Michel P J

AU - van Deurzen, Derek F P

PY - 2016/3/14

Y1 - 2016/3/14

N2 - Purpose: Recurrent anterior shoulder instability after surgical treatment can be caused by bony defects. Several diagnostic tools have been designed to measure the extent of these bony lesions. Currently, there is no consensus which measurement tool to use and decide which type of surgery is most appropriate. We therefore performed an evaluation of agreement in surgeons’ preference of diagnostic work-up and surgical treatment of anterior shoulder instability. Methods: An international survey was conducted amongst orthopaedic shoulder surgeons. The survey contained questions about surgeons’ experience, clinical and radiological examination and the subsequent treatment for anterior shoulder instability. Descriptive statistics were used to present the data, and percentages of responding surgeons were calculated. Results: The questionnaire was completed by 197 delegates from 46 countries. 55 % of the respondents think evidence in current literature is sufficient on diagnostic work-up for anterior shoulder instability. Anamnestic, number of dislocations was most frequently asked (by 95 % of respondents), the most frequently used test is the apprehension test (91 %). For imaging, conventional X-ray in various directions was most performed, followed by MR arthrography and plane CT scan respectively. The responding surgeons perform surgery (labrum repair or Latarjet) in 51 % of the patients. A median of 25 % glenoid bone loss was given by the respondents, as cut-off from when to perform a bony repair. Conclusion: Many different diagnostic examinations for assessing shoulder instability are used and a high variety is seen in the use of diagnostic tools. Also no consensus is seen in the use of different surgical options (arthroscopic and open procedures). This implies the need for more research on diagnostic imaging and the correlation with specific subsequent surgical treatment. Level of evidence: Survey, level of evidence IV.

AB - Purpose: Recurrent anterior shoulder instability after surgical treatment can be caused by bony defects. Several diagnostic tools have been designed to measure the extent of these bony lesions. Currently, there is no consensus which measurement tool to use and decide which type of surgery is most appropriate. We therefore performed an evaluation of agreement in surgeons’ preference of diagnostic work-up and surgical treatment of anterior shoulder instability. Methods: An international survey was conducted amongst orthopaedic shoulder surgeons. The survey contained questions about surgeons’ experience, clinical and radiological examination and the subsequent treatment for anterior shoulder instability. Descriptive statistics were used to present the data, and percentages of responding surgeons were calculated. Results: The questionnaire was completed by 197 delegates from 46 countries. 55 % of the respondents think evidence in current literature is sufficient on diagnostic work-up for anterior shoulder instability. Anamnestic, number of dislocations was most frequently asked (by 95 % of respondents), the most frequently used test is the apprehension test (91 %). For imaging, conventional X-ray in various directions was most performed, followed by MR arthrography and plane CT scan respectively. The responding surgeons perform surgery (labrum repair or Latarjet) in 51 % of the patients. A median of 25 % glenoid bone loss was given by the respondents, as cut-off from when to perform a bony repair. Conclusion: Many different diagnostic examinations for assessing shoulder instability are used and a high variety is seen in the use of diagnostic tools. Also no consensus is seen in the use of different surgical options (arthroscopic and open procedures). This implies the need for more research on diagnostic imaging and the correlation with specific subsequent surgical treatment. Level of evidence: Survey, level of evidence IV.

KW - Anterior instability

KW - Diagnostic

KW - Recurrence

KW - Shoulder joint

KW - Survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961153703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961153703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00402-016-2443-7

DO - 10.1007/s00402-016-2443-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84961153703

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Archiv fur orthopadische und Unfall-Chirurgie

JF - Archiv fur orthopadische und Unfall-Chirurgie

SN - 0936-8051

ER -