International survey on the management of esophageal atresia

Augusto Zani, Simon Eaton, Michael E. Hoellwarth, Prem Puri, Juan Tovar, Guenter Fasching, Pietro Bagolan, Marija Lukac, Rene Wijnen, Joachim F. Kuebler, Giovanni Cecchetto, Risto Rintala, Agostino Pierro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction Because many aspects of the management of esophageal atresia (EA) are still controversial, we evaluated the practice patterns of this condition across Europe. Methods A survey was completed by 178 delegates (from 45 [27 European] countries; 88% senior respondents) at the EUPSA-BAPS 2012. Results Approximately 66% of respondents work in centers where more than five EA repairs are performed per year. Preoperatively, 81% of respondents request an echocardiogram, and only 43% of respondents routinely perform preoperative bronchoscopy. Approximately 94% of respondents prefer an open approach, which is extrapleural in 71% of respondents. There were no differences in use of thoracoscopy between Europeans (10%) and non-Europeans (11%, p = nonsignificant). Approximately 60% of respondents measure the gap intraoperatively. A transanastomotic tube (90%) and chest drain (69%) are left in situ. Elective paralysis is adopted by 56% of respondents mainly for anastomosis tension (65%). About 72% of respondents routinely request a contrast study on postoperative day 7 (2-14). Approximately 54% of respondents use parenteral nutrition, 40% of respondents start transanastomotic feeds on postoperative day 1, and 89% of respondents start oral feeds after postoperative day 5. Pure EA: 46% of respondents work in centers that repair two or more than two pure EA a year. About 60% of respondents opt for delayed primary anastomosis at 3 months (1-12 months) with gastrostomy formation without esophagostomy. Anastomosis is achieved with open approach by 85% of respondents. About 47% of respondents attempt elongation of esophageal ends via Foker technique (43%) or with serial dilations with bougies (41%). Approximately 67% of respondents always attempt an anastomosis. Gastric interposition is the commonest esophageal substitution. Conclusion Many aspects of EA management are lacking consensus. Minimally invasive repair is still sporadic. We recommend establishment of an EA registry.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-8
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014

Keywords

  • esophageal atresia
  • esophageal replacement
  • Europe
  • pure esophageal atresia
  • thoracoscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International survey on the management of esophageal atresia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this