Intracranial pressure management in patients with traumatic brain injury: An update

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose of review Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and treatment is central in the management of traumatic brain injury. Despite 4 decades of clinical use, several aspects remain controversial, including the indications for ICP and treatment options. Recent findings Two major trials tested surgical decompression and mild hypothermia as treatments for high ICP. Both were rigorous, randomized, multicenter studies, with different designs. Decompression was tested for ICP refractory to conventional treatment, whereas hypothermia was offered as an alternative to conventional medical therapy. Decompression reduced mortality, but at the expense of more disability. The hypothermia trial was stopped because of a worse outcome in the treated arm. Indications for ICP monitoring have been reviewed and new international guidelines issued. New contributions published in 2016 have dealt with computerized analysis for predicting ICP crises; noninvasive or innovative methods for measuring ICP; reassessment of standard therapeutic interventions, such as hypertonic solutions and the level of intensity of ICP therapy. Summary Aggressive strategies for ICP control, like surgical decompression or hypothermia, carefully tested, have controversial effects on outcome. Several articles have made worthwhile contributions to important clinical issues, but with no real breakthroughs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)110-114
Number of pages5
JournalCurrent Opinion in Critical Care
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1 2017

Fingerprint

Intracranial Pressure
Hypothermia
Surgical Decompression
Decompression
Therapeutics
Hypertonic Solutions
Traumatic Brain Injury
Multicenter Studies
Guidelines
Mortality

Keywords

  • decompression
  • hypothermia
  • intracranial pressure
  • outcome
  • traumatic brain injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Intracranial pressure management in patients with traumatic brain injury : An update. / Stocchetti, Nino; Zoerle, Tommaso; Carbonara, Marco.

In: Current Opinion in Critical Care, Vol. 23, No. 2, 01.04.2017, p. 110-114.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{e0b7c6cca64e4040848a8b9249e7f41a,
title = "Intracranial pressure management in patients with traumatic brain injury: An update",
abstract = "Purpose of review Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and treatment is central in the management of traumatic brain injury. Despite 4 decades of clinical use, several aspects remain controversial, including the indications for ICP and treatment options. Recent findings Two major trials tested surgical decompression and mild hypothermia as treatments for high ICP. Both were rigorous, randomized, multicenter studies, with different designs. Decompression was tested for ICP refractory to conventional treatment, whereas hypothermia was offered as an alternative to conventional medical therapy. Decompression reduced mortality, but at the expense of more disability. The hypothermia trial was stopped because of a worse outcome in the treated arm. Indications for ICP monitoring have been reviewed and new international guidelines issued. New contributions published in 2016 have dealt with computerized analysis for predicting ICP crises; noninvasive or innovative methods for measuring ICP; reassessment of standard therapeutic interventions, such as hypertonic solutions and the level of intensity of ICP therapy. Summary Aggressive strategies for ICP control, like surgical decompression or hypothermia, carefully tested, have controversial effects on outcome. Several articles have made worthwhile contributions to important clinical issues, but with no real breakthroughs.",
keywords = "decompression, hypothermia, intracranial pressure, outcome, traumatic brain injury",
author = "Nino Stocchetti and Tommaso Zoerle and Marco Carbonara",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/MCC.0000000000000393",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "110--114",
journal = "Current Opinion in Critical Care",
issn = "1070-5295",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intracranial pressure management in patients with traumatic brain injury

T2 - An update

AU - Stocchetti, Nino

AU - Zoerle, Tommaso

AU - Carbonara, Marco

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Purpose of review Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and treatment is central in the management of traumatic brain injury. Despite 4 decades of clinical use, several aspects remain controversial, including the indications for ICP and treatment options. Recent findings Two major trials tested surgical decompression and mild hypothermia as treatments for high ICP. Both were rigorous, randomized, multicenter studies, with different designs. Decompression was tested for ICP refractory to conventional treatment, whereas hypothermia was offered as an alternative to conventional medical therapy. Decompression reduced mortality, but at the expense of more disability. The hypothermia trial was stopped because of a worse outcome in the treated arm. Indications for ICP monitoring have been reviewed and new international guidelines issued. New contributions published in 2016 have dealt with computerized analysis for predicting ICP crises; noninvasive or innovative methods for measuring ICP; reassessment of standard therapeutic interventions, such as hypertonic solutions and the level of intensity of ICP therapy. Summary Aggressive strategies for ICP control, like surgical decompression or hypothermia, carefully tested, have controversial effects on outcome. Several articles have made worthwhile contributions to important clinical issues, but with no real breakthroughs.

AB - Purpose of review Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and treatment is central in the management of traumatic brain injury. Despite 4 decades of clinical use, several aspects remain controversial, including the indications for ICP and treatment options. Recent findings Two major trials tested surgical decompression and mild hypothermia as treatments for high ICP. Both were rigorous, randomized, multicenter studies, with different designs. Decompression was tested for ICP refractory to conventional treatment, whereas hypothermia was offered as an alternative to conventional medical therapy. Decompression reduced mortality, but at the expense of more disability. The hypothermia trial was stopped because of a worse outcome in the treated arm. Indications for ICP monitoring have been reviewed and new international guidelines issued. New contributions published in 2016 have dealt with computerized analysis for predicting ICP crises; noninvasive or innovative methods for measuring ICP; reassessment of standard therapeutic interventions, such as hypertonic solutions and the level of intensity of ICP therapy. Summary Aggressive strategies for ICP control, like surgical decompression or hypothermia, carefully tested, have controversial effects on outcome. Several articles have made worthwhile contributions to important clinical issues, but with no real breakthroughs.

KW - decompression

KW - hypothermia

KW - intracranial pressure

KW - outcome

KW - traumatic brain injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011655046&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011655046&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000393

DO - 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000393

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85011655046

VL - 23

SP - 110

EP - 114

JO - Current Opinion in Critical Care

JF - Current Opinion in Critical Care

SN - 1070-5295

IS - 2

ER -