Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring interpretation in labour: a critical appraisal

G Maso, M Piccoli, F De Seta, Sara Parolin, R. Banco, L Camacho Mattos, P Bogatti, S Alberico

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) has been introduced in the obstetrics practice as a test to identify the first signs of fetal deterioration, allowing a prompt intervention to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality. However, results from clinical trials fail to demonstrate a clear benefit with the use of EFM. No decrease in the incidence of cerebral palsy due to intrapartum asphyxia has been achieved and a significant increase in the rate of operative deliveries and in medico-legal litigations has been observed instead. Despite the lack of evidence supporting its safety and effectiveness, this method is routinely used in the clinical practice and periodical updated guidelines to standardize the method of interpretation and proper actions are proposed. However, limitations still exist and the unavoidable consequences are the increasing rate of caesarean delivery, partly due to a defensive attitude in medical choices, and medico-legal litigations for presumed inappropriate evaluation in case of perinatal adverse event. While Obstetrics Societies are trying to "fight" the rise in caesarean section rates, intrapartum EFM tracings are taken in the court proceedings as one of the main evidences in case of adverse event. The aim of this review is to discuss the limitations of guidelines dealing with intrapartum EFM and the pathophysiological basis to assess the suspicious tracings which represent the most observed and critical issue of EFM interpretation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-79
Number of pages15
JournalMinerva Ginecologica
Volume67
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2015

Fingerprint

Cardiotocography
Fetal Heart Rate
Jurisprudence
Obstetrics
Guidelines
Asphyxia
Infant Mortality
Cerebral Palsy
Cesarean Section
Clinical Trials
Morbidity
Safety
Incidence

Keywords

  • Animals
  • Cardiotocography
  • Cesarean Section
  • Delivery, Obstetric
  • Female
  • Fetal Distress
  • Fetal Monitoring
  • Heart Rate, Fetal
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Labor, Obstetric
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Pregnancy
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Cite this

Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring interpretation in labour : a critical appraisal. / Maso, G; Piccoli, M; De Seta, F; Parolin, Sara; Banco, R.; Camacho Mattos, L; Bogatti, P; Alberico, S.

In: Minerva Ginecologica, Vol. 67, No. 1, 02.2015, p. 65-79.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Maso, G, Piccoli, M, De Seta, F, Parolin, S, Banco, R, Camacho Mattos, L, Bogatti, P & Alberico, S 2015, 'Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring interpretation in labour: a critical appraisal', Minerva Ginecologica, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 65-79.
Maso, G ; Piccoli, M ; De Seta, F ; Parolin, Sara ; Banco, R. ; Camacho Mattos, L ; Bogatti, P ; Alberico, S. / Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring interpretation in labour : a critical appraisal. In: Minerva Ginecologica. 2015 ; Vol. 67, No. 1. pp. 65-79.
@article{2e8abca9d58e4d659a2812583afc711c,
title = "Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring interpretation in labour: a critical appraisal",
abstract = "Electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) has been introduced in the obstetrics practice as a test to identify the first signs of fetal deterioration, allowing a prompt intervention to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality. However, results from clinical trials fail to demonstrate a clear benefit with the use of EFM. No decrease in the incidence of cerebral palsy due to intrapartum asphyxia has been achieved and a significant increase in the rate of operative deliveries and in medico-legal litigations has been observed instead. Despite the lack of evidence supporting its safety and effectiveness, this method is routinely used in the clinical practice and periodical updated guidelines to standardize the method of interpretation and proper actions are proposed. However, limitations still exist and the unavoidable consequences are the increasing rate of caesarean delivery, partly due to a defensive attitude in medical choices, and medico-legal litigations for presumed inappropriate evaluation in case of perinatal adverse event. While Obstetrics Societies are trying to {"}fight{"} the rise in caesarean section rates, intrapartum EFM tracings are taken in the court proceedings as one of the main evidences in case of adverse event. The aim of this review is to discuss the limitations of guidelines dealing with intrapartum EFM and the pathophysiological basis to assess the suspicious tracings which represent the most observed and critical issue of EFM interpretation.",
keywords = "Animals, Cardiotocography, Cesarean Section, Delivery, Obstetric, Female, Fetal Distress, Fetal Monitoring, Heart Rate, Fetal, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Labor, Obstetric, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Pregnancy, Journal Article, Review",
author = "G Maso and M Piccoli and {De Seta}, F and Sara Parolin and R. Banco and {Camacho Mattos}, L and P Bogatti and S Alberico",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "65--79",
journal = "Minerva Ginecologica",
issn = "0026-4784",
publisher = "Edizioni Minerva Medica S.p.A.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring interpretation in labour

T2 - a critical appraisal

AU - Maso, G

AU - Piccoli, M

AU - De Seta, F

AU - Parolin, Sara

AU - Banco, R.

AU - Camacho Mattos, L

AU - Bogatti, P

AU - Alberico, S

PY - 2015/2

Y1 - 2015/2

N2 - Electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) has been introduced in the obstetrics practice as a test to identify the first signs of fetal deterioration, allowing a prompt intervention to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality. However, results from clinical trials fail to demonstrate a clear benefit with the use of EFM. No decrease in the incidence of cerebral palsy due to intrapartum asphyxia has been achieved and a significant increase in the rate of operative deliveries and in medico-legal litigations has been observed instead. Despite the lack of evidence supporting its safety and effectiveness, this method is routinely used in the clinical practice and periodical updated guidelines to standardize the method of interpretation and proper actions are proposed. However, limitations still exist and the unavoidable consequences are the increasing rate of caesarean delivery, partly due to a defensive attitude in medical choices, and medico-legal litigations for presumed inappropriate evaluation in case of perinatal adverse event. While Obstetrics Societies are trying to "fight" the rise in caesarean section rates, intrapartum EFM tracings are taken in the court proceedings as one of the main evidences in case of adverse event. The aim of this review is to discuss the limitations of guidelines dealing with intrapartum EFM and the pathophysiological basis to assess the suspicious tracings which represent the most observed and critical issue of EFM interpretation.

AB - Electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) has been introduced in the obstetrics practice as a test to identify the first signs of fetal deterioration, allowing a prompt intervention to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality. However, results from clinical trials fail to demonstrate a clear benefit with the use of EFM. No decrease in the incidence of cerebral palsy due to intrapartum asphyxia has been achieved and a significant increase in the rate of operative deliveries and in medico-legal litigations has been observed instead. Despite the lack of evidence supporting its safety and effectiveness, this method is routinely used in the clinical practice and periodical updated guidelines to standardize the method of interpretation and proper actions are proposed. However, limitations still exist and the unavoidable consequences are the increasing rate of caesarean delivery, partly due to a defensive attitude in medical choices, and medico-legal litigations for presumed inappropriate evaluation in case of perinatal adverse event. While Obstetrics Societies are trying to "fight" the rise in caesarean section rates, intrapartum EFM tracings are taken in the court proceedings as one of the main evidences in case of adverse event. The aim of this review is to discuss the limitations of guidelines dealing with intrapartum EFM and the pathophysiological basis to assess the suspicious tracings which represent the most observed and critical issue of EFM interpretation.

KW - Animals

KW - Cardiotocography

KW - Cesarean Section

KW - Delivery, Obstetric

KW - Female

KW - Fetal Distress

KW - Fetal Monitoring

KW - Heart Rate, Fetal

KW - Humans

KW - Infant, Newborn

KW - Labor, Obstetric

KW - Practice Guidelines as Topic

KW - Pregnancy

KW - Journal Article

KW - Review

M3 - Article

C2 - 25411863

VL - 67

SP - 65

EP - 79

JO - Minerva Ginecologica

JF - Minerva Ginecologica

SN - 0026-4784

IS - 1

ER -