Investigating cancer patient acceptance of Whole Body MRI

Oliveri Serena, Pricolo Paola, Pizzoli Silvia, Faccio Flavia, Lampis Valentina, Summers Paul, Petralia Giuseppe, Pravettoni Gabriella

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Whole Body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) enables early cancer detection, without exposing the patient to ionizing radiation. Our aim was to investigate patients’ acceptance of WB-MRI as a procedure for cancer staging and follow up. Materials and methods: 135 oncologic subjects participated to the study. An ad hoc questionnaire was administered before and after WB-MRI, to assess patient's confidence and concerns about WB-MRI, psychological reactions, experience and perceived utility of the procedure. Results: Before undergoing WB-MRI, about 58% of the patients were concerned for cancer progression outcome. 80.4% felt that they were given good information about the exam and the most informed group also perceived and higher level of utility of WB-MRI and no risk. Among people reporting discomfort with the exam (51.9%) the main reasons were noise and exam duration. Despite this, 80% of patients expressed high levels of satisfaction, and the majority (69%) judged WB-MRI more acceptable than other diagnostic exams. Patients who believed to have received more information before the exam rated their global satisfaction higher. Conclusion: Our results show that WB-MRI examinations were well-accepted and perceived with high levels of satisfaction by most patients. WB-MRI appears to be equally or more tolerable than other total body imaging modalities (e.g. PET, CT), especially if they receive enough information from the radiologist.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)246-251
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Imaging
Volume52
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1 2018

Fingerprint

Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Neoplasms
Neoplasm Staging
Ionizing Radiation
Patient Satisfaction
Early Detection of Cancer
Noise
Psychology

Keywords

  • Cancer screening
  • Decision making
  • Psychology
  • Whole Body magnetic resonance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Investigating cancer patient acceptance of Whole Body MRI. / Serena, Oliveri; Paola, Pricolo; Silvia, Pizzoli; Flavia, Faccio; Valentina, Lampis; Paul, Summers; Giuseppe, Petralia; Gabriella, Pravettoni.

In: Clinical Imaging, Vol. 52, 01.11.2018, p. 246-251.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6e94086539bd4366bcb0259db7bf6051,
title = "Investigating cancer patient acceptance of Whole Body MRI",
abstract = "Background: Whole Body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) enables early cancer detection, without exposing the patient to ionizing radiation. Our aim was to investigate patients’ acceptance of WB-MRI as a procedure for cancer staging and follow up. Materials and methods: 135 oncologic subjects participated to the study. An ad hoc questionnaire was administered before and after WB-MRI, to assess patient's confidence and concerns about WB-MRI, psychological reactions, experience and perceived utility of the procedure. Results: Before undergoing WB-MRI, about 58{\%} of the patients were concerned for cancer progression outcome. 80.4{\%} felt that they were given good information about the exam and the most informed group also perceived and higher level of utility of WB-MRI and no risk. Among people reporting discomfort with the exam (51.9{\%}) the main reasons were noise and exam duration. Despite this, 80{\%} of patients expressed high levels of satisfaction, and the majority (69{\%}) judged WB-MRI more acceptable than other diagnostic exams. Patients who believed to have received more information before the exam rated their global satisfaction higher. Conclusion: Our results show that WB-MRI examinations were well-accepted and perceived with high levels of satisfaction by most patients. WB-MRI appears to be equally or more tolerable than other total body imaging modalities (e.g. PET, CT), especially if they receive enough information from the radiologist.",
keywords = "Cancer screening, Decision making, Psychology, Whole Body magnetic resonance",
author = "Oliveri Serena and Pricolo Paola and Pizzoli Silvia and Faccio Flavia and Lampis Valentina and Summers Paul and Petralia Giuseppe and Pravettoni Gabriella",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.08.004",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "246--251",
journal = "Clinical Imaging",
issn = "0899-7071",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigating cancer patient acceptance of Whole Body MRI

AU - Serena, Oliveri

AU - Paola, Pricolo

AU - Silvia, Pizzoli

AU - Flavia, Faccio

AU - Valentina, Lampis

AU - Paul, Summers

AU - Giuseppe, Petralia

AU - Gabriella, Pravettoni

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Background: Whole Body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) enables early cancer detection, without exposing the patient to ionizing radiation. Our aim was to investigate patients’ acceptance of WB-MRI as a procedure for cancer staging and follow up. Materials and methods: 135 oncologic subjects participated to the study. An ad hoc questionnaire was administered before and after WB-MRI, to assess patient's confidence and concerns about WB-MRI, psychological reactions, experience and perceived utility of the procedure. Results: Before undergoing WB-MRI, about 58% of the patients were concerned for cancer progression outcome. 80.4% felt that they were given good information about the exam and the most informed group also perceived and higher level of utility of WB-MRI and no risk. Among people reporting discomfort with the exam (51.9%) the main reasons were noise and exam duration. Despite this, 80% of patients expressed high levels of satisfaction, and the majority (69%) judged WB-MRI more acceptable than other diagnostic exams. Patients who believed to have received more information before the exam rated their global satisfaction higher. Conclusion: Our results show that WB-MRI examinations were well-accepted and perceived with high levels of satisfaction by most patients. WB-MRI appears to be equally or more tolerable than other total body imaging modalities (e.g. PET, CT), especially if they receive enough information from the radiologist.

AB - Background: Whole Body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) enables early cancer detection, without exposing the patient to ionizing radiation. Our aim was to investigate patients’ acceptance of WB-MRI as a procedure for cancer staging and follow up. Materials and methods: 135 oncologic subjects participated to the study. An ad hoc questionnaire was administered before and after WB-MRI, to assess patient's confidence and concerns about WB-MRI, psychological reactions, experience and perceived utility of the procedure. Results: Before undergoing WB-MRI, about 58% of the patients were concerned for cancer progression outcome. 80.4% felt that they were given good information about the exam and the most informed group also perceived and higher level of utility of WB-MRI and no risk. Among people reporting discomfort with the exam (51.9%) the main reasons were noise and exam duration. Despite this, 80% of patients expressed high levels of satisfaction, and the majority (69%) judged WB-MRI more acceptable than other diagnostic exams. Patients who believed to have received more information before the exam rated their global satisfaction higher. Conclusion: Our results show that WB-MRI examinations were well-accepted and perceived with high levels of satisfaction by most patients. WB-MRI appears to be equally or more tolerable than other total body imaging modalities (e.g. PET, CT), especially if they receive enough information from the radiologist.

KW - Cancer screening

KW - Decision making

KW - Psychology

KW - Whole Body magnetic resonance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052335337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052335337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.08.004

DO - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.08.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 30170274

AN - SCOPUS:85052335337

VL - 52

SP - 246

EP - 251

JO - Clinical Imaging

JF - Clinical Imaging

SN - 0899-7071

ER -