Is endometrioma-associated damage to ovarian reserve progressive? Insights from IVF cycles

Laura Benaglia, Marta Castiglioni, Alessio Paffoni, Veronica Sarais, Paolo Vercellini, Edgardo Somigliana

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective The relation between endometriomas and damage to ovarian reserve remains controversial. In this study, we hypothesized that this damage may not be present at the time of endometrioma formation but may conversely gradually develop over time. Study design To investigate the possibility of a time-related detrimental effect of endometriomas on ovarian reserve, we retrospectively selected 29 women with unilateral cysts who underwent at least two IVF cycles at least 6 months apart and evaluated ovarian responsiveness over time. Women were excluded if they conceived, developed new endometriomas or necessitated new medical or surgical therapies for endometriosis during the interval between the two cycles, Results The mean ± SD of the diameter of the endometriomas was 26 ± 8 mm. Most women (n = 25) had only one endometrioma. In the first cycle, the number of developing follicles in the affected and contralateral intact gonads was 4.9 ± 2.5 and 5.9 ± 2.4, respectively (p = 0.10). In the second cycle, it was 5.0 ± 2.9 and 6.0 ± 2.8, respectively (p = 0.13). The median (Interquartile Range) proportion of follicles developing in the affected ovaries in the first and second cycles was 44% (31–58%) and 44% (35–55%), respectively (p = 0.97). Subgroup analyses according to the duration of the time interval between the two assessments, the dimension of the endometriomas and the history of previous surgery for endometriosis did not show subgroups at significant risk of time-related damage. Conclusions We failed to observe an endometrioma-related reduction of ovarian responsiveness with time. However, evidence from larger series obtained in women carrying larger cysts and enrolled for longer time period of time are required for a definitive conclusion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)101-105
Number of pages5
JournalEuropean Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume217
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2017

Fingerprint

Endometriosis
Cysts
Ovarian Reserve
Gonads
Ovary
History

Keywords

  • Endometrioma
  • IVF
  • Ovarian reserve

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Is endometrioma-associated damage to ovarian reserve progressive? Insights from IVF cycles. / Benaglia, Laura; Castiglioni, Marta; Paffoni, Alessio; Sarais, Veronica; Vercellini, Paolo; Somigliana, Edgardo.

In: European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Vol. 217, 01.10.2017, p. 101-105.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1048f7c1040847b5b88390199928ad9b,
title = "Is endometrioma-associated damage to ovarian reserve progressive? Insights from IVF cycles",
abstract = "Objective The relation between endometriomas and damage to ovarian reserve remains controversial. In this study, we hypothesized that this damage may not be present at the time of endometrioma formation but may conversely gradually develop over time. Study design To investigate the possibility of a time-related detrimental effect of endometriomas on ovarian reserve, we retrospectively selected 29 women with unilateral cysts who underwent at least two IVF cycles at least 6 months apart and evaluated ovarian responsiveness over time. Women were excluded if they conceived, developed new endometriomas or necessitated new medical or surgical therapies for endometriosis during the interval between the two cycles, Results The mean ± SD of the diameter of the endometriomas was 26 ± 8 mm. Most women (n = 25) had only one endometrioma. In the first cycle, the number of developing follicles in the affected and contralateral intact gonads was 4.9 ± 2.5 and 5.9 ± 2.4, respectively (p = 0.10). In the second cycle, it was 5.0 ± 2.9 and 6.0 ± 2.8, respectively (p = 0.13). The median (Interquartile Range) proportion of follicles developing in the affected ovaries in the first and second cycles was 44{\%} (31–58{\%}) and 44{\%} (35–55{\%}), respectively (p = 0.97). Subgroup analyses according to the duration of the time interval between the two assessments, the dimension of the endometriomas and the history of previous surgery for endometriosis did not show subgroups at significant risk of time-related damage. Conclusions We failed to observe an endometrioma-related reduction of ovarian responsiveness with time. However, evidence from larger series obtained in women carrying larger cysts and enrolled for longer time period of time are required for a definitive conclusion.",
keywords = "Endometrioma, IVF, Ovarian reserve",
author = "Laura Benaglia and Marta Castiglioni and Alessio Paffoni and Veronica Sarais and Paolo Vercellini and Edgardo Somigliana",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.08.034",
language = "English",
volume = "217",
pages = "101--105",
journal = "European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology",
issn = "0028-2243",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is endometrioma-associated damage to ovarian reserve progressive? Insights from IVF cycles

AU - Benaglia, Laura

AU - Castiglioni, Marta

AU - Paffoni, Alessio

AU - Sarais, Veronica

AU - Vercellini, Paolo

AU - Somigliana, Edgardo

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Objective The relation between endometriomas and damage to ovarian reserve remains controversial. In this study, we hypothesized that this damage may not be present at the time of endometrioma formation but may conversely gradually develop over time. Study design To investigate the possibility of a time-related detrimental effect of endometriomas on ovarian reserve, we retrospectively selected 29 women with unilateral cysts who underwent at least two IVF cycles at least 6 months apart and evaluated ovarian responsiveness over time. Women were excluded if they conceived, developed new endometriomas or necessitated new medical or surgical therapies for endometriosis during the interval between the two cycles, Results The mean ± SD of the diameter of the endometriomas was 26 ± 8 mm. Most women (n = 25) had only one endometrioma. In the first cycle, the number of developing follicles in the affected and contralateral intact gonads was 4.9 ± 2.5 and 5.9 ± 2.4, respectively (p = 0.10). In the second cycle, it was 5.0 ± 2.9 and 6.0 ± 2.8, respectively (p = 0.13). The median (Interquartile Range) proportion of follicles developing in the affected ovaries in the first and second cycles was 44% (31–58%) and 44% (35–55%), respectively (p = 0.97). Subgroup analyses according to the duration of the time interval between the two assessments, the dimension of the endometriomas and the history of previous surgery for endometriosis did not show subgroups at significant risk of time-related damage. Conclusions We failed to observe an endometrioma-related reduction of ovarian responsiveness with time. However, evidence from larger series obtained in women carrying larger cysts and enrolled for longer time period of time are required for a definitive conclusion.

AB - Objective The relation between endometriomas and damage to ovarian reserve remains controversial. In this study, we hypothesized that this damage may not be present at the time of endometrioma formation but may conversely gradually develop over time. Study design To investigate the possibility of a time-related detrimental effect of endometriomas on ovarian reserve, we retrospectively selected 29 women with unilateral cysts who underwent at least two IVF cycles at least 6 months apart and evaluated ovarian responsiveness over time. Women were excluded if they conceived, developed new endometriomas or necessitated new medical or surgical therapies for endometriosis during the interval between the two cycles, Results The mean ± SD of the diameter of the endometriomas was 26 ± 8 mm. Most women (n = 25) had only one endometrioma. In the first cycle, the number of developing follicles in the affected and contralateral intact gonads was 4.9 ± 2.5 and 5.9 ± 2.4, respectively (p = 0.10). In the second cycle, it was 5.0 ± 2.9 and 6.0 ± 2.8, respectively (p = 0.13). The median (Interquartile Range) proportion of follicles developing in the affected ovaries in the first and second cycles was 44% (31–58%) and 44% (35–55%), respectively (p = 0.97). Subgroup analyses according to the duration of the time interval between the two assessments, the dimension of the endometriomas and the history of previous surgery for endometriosis did not show subgroups at significant risk of time-related damage. Conclusions We failed to observe an endometrioma-related reduction of ovarian responsiveness with time. However, evidence from larger series obtained in women carrying larger cysts and enrolled for longer time period of time are required for a definitive conclusion.

KW - Endometrioma

KW - IVF

KW - Ovarian reserve

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028701362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028701362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.08.034

DO - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.08.034

M3 - Article

VL - 217

SP - 101

EP - 105

JO - European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

JF - European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

SN - 0028-2243

ER -