Is firstly diagnosed ALS really ALS? Results of a population-based study with long-term follow-up

Elisabetta Pupillo, Elisa Bianchi, Marco Poloni, Ettore Beghi, Gabriele Mora, SLALOM Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To revise the first diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in patients from a well-defined population.

METHODS: Patients diagnosed with ALS in the years 1998-2002 and resident of Lombardy Region, Northern Italy were followed until death or April 30 2016 to assess long-term survival. During follow-up, the caring neurologists were asked to confirm the first diagnosis. Revised diagnoses were classified as confirmed and unconfirmed motor neuron disease (MND) with further specification where available. The two groups were compared for age, sex, disease duration at diagnosis, site of onset, and El Escorial category. Survival with predictors were also compared.

RESULTS: Included were 280 men and 203 women aged 18-93 years. During follow-up, 25 cases (5.2%) received a diagnosis different from MND. Diseases of spinal roots and peripheral nerves and vascular encephalopathy predominated. Patients with definite (OR 0.15; 95%CI 0.04-0.52) and probable (OR 0.15; 95%CI 0.04-0.62) ALS were least likely to have an unconfirmed MND diagnosis. At end of follow-up, 2.2% of patients with confirmed MND and 44.0% of patients with unconfirmed MND were reported alive (HR 0.14; 95%CI 0.08-0.25).

CONCLUSIONS: At the time of a first diagnosis of ALS, the possibility still exists that another, less severe clinical condition, is present.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)221-226
Number of pages6
JournalAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration
Volume18
Issue number3-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2017

Keywords

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Is firstly diagnosed ALS really ALS? Results of a population-based study with long-term follow-up'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this