Is it possible to assess subjective well-being among bipolar inpatients? An 18-week follow-up study

A. Carlo Altamura, Matteo Porcellana, Paola M. Marinaccio, Maria Ciabatti, Emanuela P. Nocito, Lorenzo Magri, Cinzia Bressi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The study evaluates the association between subjective well-being and psychopathology in bipolar inpatients at the time of hospitalization and during a follow-up period. Method: One hundred twenty consecutive inpatients with a diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder were studied on admission (T0), at discharge (T1) and every 6 weeks for 18 weeks after hospitalization. The Young's Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) were used to determine affective symptoms, while subjective well-being was assessed by subjective well-being under neuroleptic (SWN). Associations between SWN and HAM-D or YMRS scores and between their changes were analyzed across the different time points by using Pearson correlation coefficients. Linear regression models were constructed using SWN as the dependent variable and demographic and clinical characteristics as possible predictors. Results: At baseline, depression explained 24% and mania explained an additional 16% of baseline SWN variance. Changes in SWN and HAM-D total score displayed an inverse correlation during hospitalization and follow-up. End point severity of depression was associated with the end point SWN total score explaining additional 26% of SWN total score variance, whereas severity of mania was inversely associated with SWN total score. Conclusion: Data of this study provide further support for the need to consider the subjective well-being as a personal variable associated to psychopathological state in bipolar patients. However, results seem to be in line with authors who suggest to use other subjective quality of life scales in acute mania.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)185-190
Number of pages6
JournalGeneral Hospital Psychiatry
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

Antipsychotic Agents
Inpatients
Bipolar Disorder
Hospitalization
Depression
Linear Models
Affective Symptoms
Psychopathology
Mood Disorders
Quality of Life
Demography

Keywords

  • Bipolar disorder
  • Outcome
  • Quality of life
  • Subjective well-being

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Is it possible to assess subjective well-being among bipolar inpatients? An 18-week follow-up study. / Altamura, A. Carlo; Porcellana, Matteo; Marinaccio, Paola M.; Ciabatti, Maria; Nocito, Emanuela P.; Magri, Lorenzo; Bressi, Cinzia.

In: General Hospital Psychiatry, Vol. 33, No. 2, 03.2011, p. 185-190.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Altamura, A. Carlo ; Porcellana, Matteo ; Marinaccio, Paola M. ; Ciabatti, Maria ; Nocito, Emanuela P. ; Magri, Lorenzo ; Bressi, Cinzia. / Is it possible to assess subjective well-being among bipolar inpatients? An 18-week follow-up study. In: General Hospital Psychiatry. 2011 ; Vol. 33, No. 2. pp. 185-190.
@article{dc6bebbbd81a4a76986ca094fcc5eef8,
title = "Is it possible to assess subjective well-being among bipolar inpatients? An 18-week follow-up study",
abstract = "Objective: The study evaluates the association between subjective well-being and psychopathology in bipolar inpatients at the time of hospitalization and during a follow-up period. Method: One hundred twenty consecutive inpatients with a diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder were studied on admission (T0), at discharge (T1) and every 6 weeks for 18 weeks after hospitalization. The Young's Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) were used to determine affective symptoms, while subjective well-being was assessed by subjective well-being under neuroleptic (SWN). Associations between SWN and HAM-D or YMRS scores and between their changes were analyzed across the different time points by using Pearson correlation coefficients. Linear regression models were constructed using SWN as the dependent variable and demographic and clinical characteristics as possible predictors. Results: At baseline, depression explained 24{\%} and mania explained an additional 16{\%} of baseline SWN variance. Changes in SWN and HAM-D total score displayed an inverse correlation during hospitalization and follow-up. End point severity of depression was associated with the end point SWN total score explaining additional 26{\%} of SWN total score variance, whereas severity of mania was inversely associated with SWN total score. Conclusion: Data of this study provide further support for the need to consider the subjective well-being as a personal variable associated to psychopathological state in bipolar patients. However, results seem to be in line with authors who suggest to use other subjective quality of life scales in acute mania.",
keywords = "Bipolar disorder, Outcome, Quality of life, Subjective well-being",
author = "Altamura, {A. Carlo} and Matteo Porcellana and Marinaccio, {Paola M.} and Maria Ciabatti and Nocito, {Emanuela P.} and Lorenzo Magri and Cinzia Bressi",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2011.01.003",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "185--190",
journal = "General Hospital Psychiatry",
issn = "0163-8343",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is it possible to assess subjective well-being among bipolar inpatients? An 18-week follow-up study

AU - Altamura, A. Carlo

AU - Porcellana, Matteo

AU - Marinaccio, Paola M.

AU - Ciabatti, Maria

AU - Nocito, Emanuela P.

AU - Magri, Lorenzo

AU - Bressi, Cinzia

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - Objective: The study evaluates the association between subjective well-being and psychopathology in bipolar inpatients at the time of hospitalization and during a follow-up period. Method: One hundred twenty consecutive inpatients with a diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder were studied on admission (T0), at discharge (T1) and every 6 weeks for 18 weeks after hospitalization. The Young's Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) were used to determine affective symptoms, while subjective well-being was assessed by subjective well-being under neuroleptic (SWN). Associations between SWN and HAM-D or YMRS scores and between their changes were analyzed across the different time points by using Pearson correlation coefficients. Linear regression models were constructed using SWN as the dependent variable and demographic and clinical characteristics as possible predictors. Results: At baseline, depression explained 24% and mania explained an additional 16% of baseline SWN variance. Changes in SWN and HAM-D total score displayed an inverse correlation during hospitalization and follow-up. End point severity of depression was associated with the end point SWN total score explaining additional 26% of SWN total score variance, whereas severity of mania was inversely associated with SWN total score. Conclusion: Data of this study provide further support for the need to consider the subjective well-being as a personal variable associated to psychopathological state in bipolar patients. However, results seem to be in line with authors who suggest to use other subjective quality of life scales in acute mania.

AB - Objective: The study evaluates the association between subjective well-being and psychopathology in bipolar inpatients at the time of hospitalization and during a follow-up period. Method: One hundred twenty consecutive inpatients with a diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder were studied on admission (T0), at discharge (T1) and every 6 weeks for 18 weeks after hospitalization. The Young's Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) were used to determine affective symptoms, while subjective well-being was assessed by subjective well-being under neuroleptic (SWN). Associations between SWN and HAM-D or YMRS scores and between their changes were analyzed across the different time points by using Pearson correlation coefficients. Linear regression models were constructed using SWN as the dependent variable and demographic and clinical characteristics as possible predictors. Results: At baseline, depression explained 24% and mania explained an additional 16% of baseline SWN variance. Changes in SWN and HAM-D total score displayed an inverse correlation during hospitalization and follow-up. End point severity of depression was associated with the end point SWN total score explaining additional 26% of SWN total score variance, whereas severity of mania was inversely associated with SWN total score. Conclusion: Data of this study provide further support for the need to consider the subjective well-being as a personal variable associated to psychopathological state in bipolar patients. However, results seem to be in line with authors who suggest to use other subjective quality of life scales in acute mania.

KW - Bipolar disorder

KW - Outcome

KW - Quality of life

KW - Subjective well-being

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79956049395&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79956049395&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2011.01.003

DO - 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2011.01.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 21596212

AN - SCOPUS:79956049395

VL - 33

SP - 185

EP - 190

JO - General Hospital Psychiatry

JF - General Hospital Psychiatry

SN - 0163-8343

IS - 2

ER -