Is pocket-size ultrasound a reliable tool for bowel investigation? A study on its feasibility, reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy

Andrea Costantino, Mariangela Giunta, Giovanni Casazza, Silvia Arona, Agostino Colli, Dario Conte, Maurizio Vecchi, Mirella Fraquelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) examination is a first-line non-invasive imaging procedure for patients with suspicion of bowel diseases. Aim: To assess the feasibility, reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy of a pocket-size ultrasound device (PUD) in identifying the presence of intestinal alterations in patients consecutively recruited to undergo IUS examination. Methods: 200 consecutive patients (57% female, 48.8 years) underwent both PUD (two independent investigators) and IUS examination on the same day. Nine ultrasonographic signs were systematically searched for. PUD inter-observer reproducibility was assessed by kappa statistic and ICC. The diagnostic accuracy of PUD as compared to IUS results was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity and corresponding positive and negative likelihood ratios. Results: PUD and IUS examinations were successful in 100% of the patients. PUD reproducibility was good/excellent at evidencing the presence (ICC 0.84) and length (ICC 0.85) of an intestinal tract with thickened wall and abdominal free fluid (ICC 0.87). The diagnostic accuracy of PUD, compared to traditional IUS, was good with regard to the presence of bowel wall thickening (sensitivity 92%, specificity 95%), the length of the thickened bowel (sensitivity 94%, specificity 95%) and the presence of free fluid (sensitivity 81%, specificity 99%). Conclusions: PUD is a feasible, reproducible and accurate first-line screening tool for the assessment of the gastro-intestinal tract.

Original languageEnglish
JournalDigestive and Liver Disease
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Equipment and Supplies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Abdominal Wall
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Echoscopy
  • Gastro-intestinal ultrasound
  • Pocket-size ultrasound device
  • Reproducibility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Is pocket-size ultrasound a reliable tool for bowel investigation? A study on its feasibility, reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy. / Costantino, Andrea; Giunta, Mariangela; Casazza, Giovanni; Arona, Silvia; Colli, Agostino; Conte, Dario; Vecchi, Maurizio; Fraquelli, Mirella.

In: Digestive and Liver Disease, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5e60fd82141646829f1b3203f0d669ae,
title = "Is pocket-size ultrasound a reliable tool for bowel investigation? A study on its feasibility, reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy",
abstract = "Background: Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) examination is a first-line non-invasive imaging procedure for patients with suspicion of bowel diseases. Aim: To assess the feasibility, reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy of a pocket-size ultrasound device (PUD) in identifying the presence of intestinal alterations in patients consecutively recruited to undergo IUS examination. Methods: 200 consecutive patients (57{\%} female, 48.8 years) underwent both PUD (two independent investigators) and IUS examination on the same day. Nine ultrasonographic signs were systematically searched for. PUD inter-observer reproducibility was assessed by kappa statistic and ICC. The diagnostic accuracy of PUD as compared to IUS results was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity and corresponding positive and negative likelihood ratios. Results: PUD and IUS examinations were successful in 100{\%} of the patients. PUD reproducibility was good/excellent at evidencing the presence (ICC 0.84) and length (ICC 0.85) of an intestinal tract with thickened wall and abdominal free fluid (ICC 0.87). The diagnostic accuracy of PUD, compared to traditional IUS, was good with regard to the presence of bowel wall thickening (sensitivity 92{\%}, specificity 95{\%}), the length of the thickened bowel (sensitivity 94{\%}, specificity 95{\%}) and the presence of free fluid (sensitivity 81{\%}, specificity 99{\%}). Conclusions: PUD is a feasible, reproducible and accurate first-line screening tool for the assessment of the gastro-intestinal tract.",
keywords = "Echoscopy, Gastro-intestinal ultrasound, Pocket-size ultrasound device, Reproducibility",
author = "Andrea Costantino and Mariangela Giunta and Giovanni Casazza and Silvia Arona and Agostino Colli and Dario Conte and Maurizio Vecchi and Mirella Fraquelli",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.dld.2019.07.008",
language = "English",
journal = "Digestive and Liver Disease",
issn = "1590-8658",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is pocket-size ultrasound a reliable tool for bowel investigation? A study on its feasibility, reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy

AU - Costantino, Andrea

AU - Giunta, Mariangela

AU - Casazza, Giovanni

AU - Arona, Silvia

AU - Colli, Agostino

AU - Conte, Dario

AU - Vecchi, Maurizio

AU - Fraquelli, Mirella

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) examination is a first-line non-invasive imaging procedure for patients with suspicion of bowel diseases. Aim: To assess the feasibility, reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy of a pocket-size ultrasound device (PUD) in identifying the presence of intestinal alterations in patients consecutively recruited to undergo IUS examination. Methods: 200 consecutive patients (57% female, 48.8 years) underwent both PUD (two independent investigators) and IUS examination on the same day. Nine ultrasonographic signs were systematically searched for. PUD inter-observer reproducibility was assessed by kappa statistic and ICC. The diagnostic accuracy of PUD as compared to IUS results was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity and corresponding positive and negative likelihood ratios. Results: PUD and IUS examinations were successful in 100% of the patients. PUD reproducibility was good/excellent at evidencing the presence (ICC 0.84) and length (ICC 0.85) of an intestinal tract with thickened wall and abdominal free fluid (ICC 0.87). The diagnostic accuracy of PUD, compared to traditional IUS, was good with regard to the presence of bowel wall thickening (sensitivity 92%, specificity 95%), the length of the thickened bowel (sensitivity 94%, specificity 95%) and the presence of free fluid (sensitivity 81%, specificity 99%). Conclusions: PUD is a feasible, reproducible and accurate first-line screening tool for the assessment of the gastro-intestinal tract.

AB - Background: Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) examination is a first-line non-invasive imaging procedure for patients with suspicion of bowel diseases. Aim: To assess the feasibility, reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy of a pocket-size ultrasound device (PUD) in identifying the presence of intestinal alterations in patients consecutively recruited to undergo IUS examination. Methods: 200 consecutive patients (57% female, 48.8 years) underwent both PUD (two independent investigators) and IUS examination on the same day. Nine ultrasonographic signs were systematically searched for. PUD inter-observer reproducibility was assessed by kappa statistic and ICC. The diagnostic accuracy of PUD as compared to IUS results was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity and corresponding positive and negative likelihood ratios. Results: PUD and IUS examinations were successful in 100% of the patients. PUD reproducibility was good/excellent at evidencing the presence (ICC 0.84) and length (ICC 0.85) of an intestinal tract with thickened wall and abdominal free fluid (ICC 0.87). The diagnostic accuracy of PUD, compared to traditional IUS, was good with regard to the presence of bowel wall thickening (sensitivity 92%, specificity 95%), the length of the thickened bowel (sensitivity 94%, specificity 95%) and the presence of free fluid (sensitivity 81%, specificity 99%). Conclusions: PUD is a feasible, reproducible and accurate first-line screening tool for the assessment of the gastro-intestinal tract.

KW - Echoscopy

KW - Gastro-intestinal ultrasound

KW - Pocket-size ultrasound device

KW - Reproducibility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070276748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070276748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dld.2019.07.008

DO - 10.1016/j.dld.2019.07.008

M3 - Article

JO - Digestive and Liver Disease

JF - Digestive and Liver Disease

SN - 1590-8658

ER -