Is the rivermead mobility index a suitable outcome measure in lower limb amputees? - A psychometric validation study

Franco Franchignoni, Stefano Brunelli, Duccio Orlandini, Giorgio Ferriero, Marco Traballesi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To examine the internal consistency, validity, responsiveness and test scalability of the Rivermead Mobility Index. Design: Methodological research (consecutive sampling, prospective longitudinal study). Patients: 140 unilateral lower limb amputees (79 above-knee and 61 below-knee). Methods: The Rivermead Mobility Index was administered to all patients at the beginning (T0) and at the end (T2) of the prosthetic training. In 70 of the patients, the Functional Independence Measure and a timed walking test were also carried out. Results: The Cronbach's alpha of the Rivermead Mobility Index was 0.85 and the item-to-total correlation coefficients rpb ranged from 0.33 to 0.74 (p <0.0001), for the items considered, at T0; 4 correlations were not calculated due to the extremely low variability of some item responses (mode ≥98%). The correlation (rs) of Rivermead Mobility Index score with the motor subscale of the Functional Independence Measure was 0.83 at T0 and 0.69 at T2 (p <0.0001, for both) and that with timed walking test -0.70 (p <0.0001) at T2. The effect size was 1.35. The scalability coefficients were below the limits of acceptability. Conclusion: When applied in lower limb amputees, the Rivermead Mobility Index is an ordinal measure with adequate levels of a series of psychometric properties, which seems more useful for epidemiological studies than for clinical decision-making in single patients. Further steps should be considered to improve its item selection, response format and scaling properties.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-144
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2003

Fingerprint

Amputees
Validation Studies
Psychometrics
Lower Extremity
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Walking
Knee
Longitudinal Studies
Epidemiologic Studies
Research Design
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Amputees
  • Leg prosthesis
  • Outcome assessment
  • Psychometrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Is the rivermead mobility index a suitable outcome measure in lower limb amputees? - A psychometric validation study. / Franchignoni, Franco; Brunelli, Stefano; Orlandini, Duccio; Ferriero, Giorgio; Traballesi, Marco.

In: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol. 35, No. 3, 05.2003, p. 141-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{35b58d80ecd14db98d48afce2897816c,
title = "Is the rivermead mobility index a suitable outcome measure in lower limb amputees? - A psychometric validation study",
abstract = "Objective: To examine the internal consistency, validity, responsiveness and test scalability of the Rivermead Mobility Index. Design: Methodological research (consecutive sampling, prospective longitudinal study). Patients: 140 unilateral lower limb amputees (79 above-knee and 61 below-knee). Methods: The Rivermead Mobility Index was administered to all patients at the beginning (T0) and at the end (T2) of the prosthetic training. In 70 of the patients, the Functional Independence Measure and a timed walking test were also carried out. Results: The Cronbach's alpha of the Rivermead Mobility Index was 0.85 and the item-to-total correlation coefficients rpb ranged from 0.33 to 0.74 (p <0.0001), for the items considered, at T0; 4 correlations were not calculated due to the extremely low variability of some item responses (mode ≥98{\%}). The correlation (rs) of Rivermead Mobility Index score with the motor subscale of the Functional Independence Measure was 0.83 at T0 and 0.69 at T2 (p <0.0001, for both) and that with timed walking test -0.70 (p <0.0001) at T2. The effect size was 1.35. The scalability coefficients were below the limits of acceptability. Conclusion: When applied in lower limb amputees, the Rivermead Mobility Index is an ordinal measure with adequate levels of a series of psychometric properties, which seems more useful for epidemiological studies than for clinical decision-making in single patients. Further steps should be considered to improve its item selection, response format and scaling properties.",
keywords = "Amputees, Leg prosthesis, Outcome assessment, Psychometrics",
author = "Franco Franchignoni and Stefano Brunelli and Duccio Orlandini and Giorgio Ferriero and Marco Traballesi",
year = "2003",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1080/16501970310010493",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "141--144",
journal = "Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine",
issn = "1650-1977",
publisher = "Foundation for Rehabilitation Information",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is the rivermead mobility index a suitable outcome measure in lower limb amputees? - A psychometric validation study

AU - Franchignoni, Franco

AU - Brunelli, Stefano

AU - Orlandini, Duccio

AU - Ferriero, Giorgio

AU - Traballesi, Marco

PY - 2003/5

Y1 - 2003/5

N2 - Objective: To examine the internal consistency, validity, responsiveness and test scalability of the Rivermead Mobility Index. Design: Methodological research (consecutive sampling, prospective longitudinal study). Patients: 140 unilateral lower limb amputees (79 above-knee and 61 below-knee). Methods: The Rivermead Mobility Index was administered to all patients at the beginning (T0) and at the end (T2) of the prosthetic training. In 70 of the patients, the Functional Independence Measure and a timed walking test were also carried out. Results: The Cronbach's alpha of the Rivermead Mobility Index was 0.85 and the item-to-total correlation coefficients rpb ranged from 0.33 to 0.74 (p <0.0001), for the items considered, at T0; 4 correlations were not calculated due to the extremely low variability of some item responses (mode ≥98%). The correlation (rs) of Rivermead Mobility Index score with the motor subscale of the Functional Independence Measure was 0.83 at T0 and 0.69 at T2 (p <0.0001, for both) and that with timed walking test -0.70 (p <0.0001) at T2. The effect size was 1.35. The scalability coefficients were below the limits of acceptability. Conclusion: When applied in lower limb amputees, the Rivermead Mobility Index is an ordinal measure with adequate levels of a series of psychometric properties, which seems more useful for epidemiological studies than for clinical decision-making in single patients. Further steps should be considered to improve its item selection, response format and scaling properties.

AB - Objective: To examine the internal consistency, validity, responsiveness and test scalability of the Rivermead Mobility Index. Design: Methodological research (consecutive sampling, prospective longitudinal study). Patients: 140 unilateral lower limb amputees (79 above-knee and 61 below-knee). Methods: The Rivermead Mobility Index was administered to all patients at the beginning (T0) and at the end (T2) of the prosthetic training. In 70 of the patients, the Functional Independence Measure and a timed walking test were also carried out. Results: The Cronbach's alpha of the Rivermead Mobility Index was 0.85 and the item-to-total correlation coefficients rpb ranged from 0.33 to 0.74 (p <0.0001), for the items considered, at T0; 4 correlations were not calculated due to the extremely low variability of some item responses (mode ≥98%). The correlation (rs) of Rivermead Mobility Index score with the motor subscale of the Functional Independence Measure was 0.83 at T0 and 0.69 at T2 (p <0.0001, for both) and that with timed walking test -0.70 (p <0.0001) at T2. The effect size was 1.35. The scalability coefficients were below the limits of acceptability. Conclusion: When applied in lower limb amputees, the Rivermead Mobility Index is an ordinal measure with adequate levels of a series of psychometric properties, which seems more useful for epidemiological studies than for clinical decision-making in single patients. Further steps should be considered to improve its item selection, response format and scaling properties.

KW - Amputees

KW - Leg prosthesis

KW - Outcome assessment

KW - Psychometrics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037529217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037529217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/16501970310010493

DO - 10.1080/16501970310010493

M3 - Article

C2 - 12809197

AN - SCOPUS:0037529217

VL - 35

SP - 141

EP - 144

JO - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

JF - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

SN - 1650-1977

IS - 3

ER -