Isolated aortitis versus giant cell arteritis

Are they really two sides of the same coin?

Rosaria Talarico, Luigi Boiardi, Nicolò Pipitone, Anna D'Ascanio, Chiara Stagnaro, Claudia Ferrari, Elena Elefante, Carlo Salvarani, Stefano Bombardieri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to compare epidemiological data, clinical findings and results of investigations in patients with isolated aortitis and those with giant cell arteritis (GCA) to establish whether patients with isolated aortitis differ from those with GCA. Patients and methods: We reviewed the medical notes of all patients consecutively seen in two Rheumatology centres in the last two decades with a suspicion of GCA, searching for cases characterised by abnormal [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET uptake of the aorta. "Isolated aortitis" was defined as increased FDG uptake in the aorta not explained by atherosclerosis in the absence of FDG uptake in other large vessels. Results: Comparing the epidemiological and clinical data of patients with isolated arteritis with those with GCA, we observed many statistical significant differences. First of all, the male/female ratio was reversed, with a predominant male involvement in isolated arteritis. Moreover, the mean age of patients with isolated arteritis was significantly lower than that of GCA patients (62 vs. 78.4 yrs; p

Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical and Experimental Rheumatology
Volume32
Issue numberSUPPL.82
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Aortitis
Giant Cell Arteritis
Arteritis
Aorta
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Rheumatology
Atherosclerosis

Keywords

  • Giant cell arteritis
  • Isolated aortitis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology
  • Immunology
  • Immunology and Allergy

Cite this

Talarico, R., Boiardi, L., Pipitone, N., D'Ascanio, A., Stagnaro, C., Ferrari, C., ... Bombardieri, S. (2014). Isolated aortitis versus giant cell arteritis: Are they really two sides of the same coin? Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 32(SUPPL.82).

Isolated aortitis versus giant cell arteritis : Are they really two sides of the same coin? / Talarico, Rosaria; Boiardi, Luigi; Pipitone, Nicolò; D'Ascanio, Anna; Stagnaro, Chiara; Ferrari, Claudia; Elefante, Elena; Salvarani, Carlo; Bombardieri, Stefano.

In: Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, Vol. 32, No. SUPPL.82, 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Talarico, R, Boiardi, L, Pipitone, N, D'Ascanio, A, Stagnaro, C, Ferrari, C, Elefante, E, Salvarani, C & Bombardieri, S 2014, 'Isolated aortitis versus giant cell arteritis: Are they really two sides of the same coin?', Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 32, no. SUPPL.82.
Talarico R, Boiardi L, Pipitone N, D'Ascanio A, Stagnaro C, Ferrari C et al. Isolated aortitis versus giant cell arteritis: Are they really two sides of the same coin? Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology. 2014;32(SUPPL.82).
Talarico, Rosaria ; Boiardi, Luigi ; Pipitone, Nicolò ; D'Ascanio, Anna ; Stagnaro, Chiara ; Ferrari, Claudia ; Elefante, Elena ; Salvarani, Carlo ; Bombardieri, Stefano. / Isolated aortitis versus giant cell arteritis : Are they really two sides of the same coin?. In: Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology. 2014 ; Vol. 32, No. SUPPL.82.
@article{b19b2687548c415b85a1dd6c4311b825,
title = "Isolated aortitis versus giant cell arteritis: Are they really two sides of the same coin?",
abstract = "Objective: The aim of the study was to compare epidemiological data, clinical findings and results of investigations in patients with isolated aortitis and those with giant cell arteritis (GCA) to establish whether patients with isolated aortitis differ from those with GCA. Patients and methods: We reviewed the medical notes of all patients consecutively seen in two Rheumatology centres in the last two decades with a suspicion of GCA, searching for cases characterised by abnormal [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET uptake of the aorta. {"}Isolated aortitis{"} was defined as increased FDG uptake in the aorta not explained by atherosclerosis in the absence of FDG uptake in other large vessels. Results: Comparing the epidemiological and clinical data of patients with isolated arteritis with those with GCA, we observed many statistical significant differences. First of all, the male/female ratio was reversed, with a predominant male involvement in isolated arteritis. Moreover, the mean age of patients with isolated arteritis was significantly lower than that of GCA patients (62 vs. 78.4 yrs; p",
keywords = "Giant cell arteritis, Isolated aortitis",
author = "Rosaria Talarico and Luigi Boiardi and Nicol{\`o} Pipitone and Anna D'Ascanio and Chiara Stagnaro and Claudia Ferrari and Elena Elefante and Carlo Salvarani and Stefano Bombardieri",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
journal = "Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology",
issn = "0392-856X",
publisher = "Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology S.A.S.",
number = "SUPPL.82",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Isolated aortitis versus giant cell arteritis

T2 - Are they really two sides of the same coin?

AU - Talarico, Rosaria

AU - Boiardi, Luigi

AU - Pipitone, Nicolò

AU - D'Ascanio, Anna

AU - Stagnaro, Chiara

AU - Ferrari, Claudia

AU - Elefante, Elena

AU - Salvarani, Carlo

AU - Bombardieri, Stefano

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objective: The aim of the study was to compare epidemiological data, clinical findings and results of investigations in patients with isolated aortitis and those with giant cell arteritis (GCA) to establish whether patients with isolated aortitis differ from those with GCA. Patients and methods: We reviewed the medical notes of all patients consecutively seen in two Rheumatology centres in the last two decades with a suspicion of GCA, searching for cases characterised by abnormal [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET uptake of the aorta. "Isolated aortitis" was defined as increased FDG uptake in the aorta not explained by atherosclerosis in the absence of FDG uptake in other large vessels. Results: Comparing the epidemiological and clinical data of patients with isolated arteritis with those with GCA, we observed many statistical significant differences. First of all, the male/female ratio was reversed, with a predominant male involvement in isolated arteritis. Moreover, the mean age of patients with isolated arteritis was significantly lower than that of GCA patients (62 vs. 78.4 yrs; p

AB - Objective: The aim of the study was to compare epidemiological data, clinical findings and results of investigations in patients with isolated aortitis and those with giant cell arteritis (GCA) to establish whether patients with isolated aortitis differ from those with GCA. Patients and methods: We reviewed the medical notes of all patients consecutively seen in two Rheumatology centres in the last two decades with a suspicion of GCA, searching for cases characterised by abnormal [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET uptake of the aorta. "Isolated aortitis" was defined as increased FDG uptake in the aorta not explained by atherosclerosis in the absence of FDG uptake in other large vessels. Results: Comparing the epidemiological and clinical data of patients with isolated arteritis with those with GCA, we observed many statistical significant differences. First of all, the male/female ratio was reversed, with a predominant male involvement in isolated arteritis. Moreover, the mean age of patients with isolated arteritis was significantly lower than that of GCA patients (62 vs. 78.4 yrs; p

KW - Giant cell arteritis

KW - Isolated aortitis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901913661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901913661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 32

JO - Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology

JF - Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology

SN - 0392-856X

IS - SUPPL.82

ER -