Isotopic and nonisotopic assays for measuring somatotropin compared: Re-evaluation of cutoff value in provocative tests

Giuseppe Banfi, Marcello Marinelli, Erminia Casari, Michelangelo Murone, Pierangelo Bonini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Measurement of human growth hormone (hGH; somatotropin) concentrations in serum after provocative tests is crucial for diagnosing deficiencies in production of this hormone. Serum hGH can be measured by various immunoassays, isotopic and nonisotopic, with monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies: a cutoff value of 10 μg/L after provocative testing is usually used to distinguish normal from hGH-deficient children. Previous studies demonstrated discrepancies in hGH measurement by different radioisotopic immunoassays. Here we evaluated the responses of six different commercial assays, radioisotopic and nonisotopic, with monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies in a series of 16 provocative tests (stimulation with clonidine) in short children. A wide range of discrepant values was obtained with the different kits. A cutoff of 10 μg/L produced discordance of diagnosis among assays for two children, whereas complete agreement was reached for a cutoff value of 7 μg/L. Parallelism tests performed with hGH international standard, pure recombinant hGH, and a serum with high hGH content suggest that heterogeneity of the antibodies used by the manufacturers, even among monoclonal antibodies, is the main source of discordant results. Cutoff values and reference values must be established separately for each method proposed for routine use.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)273-276
Number of pages4
JournalClinical Chemistry
Volume37
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1991

Keywords

  • Analytical error
  • Clonidine stimulation
  • Intermethod comparison
  • Monoclonal antibodies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Biochemistry

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Isotopic and nonisotopic assays for measuring somatotropin compared: Re-evaluation of cutoff value in provocative tests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this