Italian Validation of the Touch Avoidance Measure and the Touch Avoidance Questionnaire

Laura Casetta, Luca Rizzi, Marcello Passarelli, Giorgio Arcara, Raffaella Perrella

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Social touch is essential in relationships and well-being, but the unique personal experience of touch is not assessed and taken into account in health and social care services. The pleasantness of gentle stroking is influenced by gender, toucher genre, toucher familiarity, culture, and age. Moreover, pleasantness is influenced by touch avoidance, the attitude toward interpersonal touch. The aim of this article is to present the translation, adaptation, and validation in Italian of two scales to measure touch avoidance. For translation and validation, we selected the most used scale, the Touch Avoidance Measure (TAM) and a more recent scale, the Touch Avoidance Questionnaire (TAQ). Confirmatory factor analyses reported good model fit for the TAM [comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.947, Tucker–Lewis index (TLI) = 0.940, root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.065] and excellent model fit for the TAQ (CFI = 0.954, TLI = 0.950, RMSEA = 0.058). Internal consistency was high for all subscales, except the TAQ “Stranger” subscale. One-month test–retest reliability ranged from 0.67 to 0.90 for each subscale. Lastly, convergent validity between the TAM and TAQ was also found to be high. We conclude that the TAM and TAQ can be used to assess touch avoidance with Italian samples. The instrument can be used to support healthcare professionals and to assess attitudes toward touch in individuals with interpersonal difficulties.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1673
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 23 2020

Keywords

  • Italian validation
  • non-verbal communication
  • ordinal CFA
  • social touch
  • touch avoidance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Italian Validation of the Touch Avoidance Measure and the Touch Avoidance Questionnaire'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this