Item re-scaling of an italian version of the sickness impact profile: Effect of age and profession of the observers

Niccoló Marchionni, Luigi Ferrucci, Samuele Baldasseroni, Stefano Fumagalli, Jack M. Guralnik, Maura Bonazinga, Francesca Cecchi, Giulio Masotti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

An Italian version of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) obtained by professional and nonprofessional translators was checked for cross-cultural equivalence using a back-translation method followed by two scaling studies. The first scaling study involved 30 health professionals who ranked the items within each category for severity of dysfunction. By comparing Italian and US average ranks, 14 highly discordant items were identified. A revised translation was evaluated in a new study involving 120 observers stratified by age (<65 versus ≤ 55 years) and profession (health versus non health professionals) into 4 groups of the same size. The Italian and American item rank orders were almost equivalent, independently of the age and profession of the observers (93% of the ranks showing differences <2), suggesting that this Italian version of SIP is cross-culturally unbiased. However, older age was associated with higher variability in the rank orders, and some caution is required for use in the geriatric population.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)195-201
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume50
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 1997

Fingerprint

Sickness Impact Profile
Health Occupations
Health
Geriatrics
Population

Keywords

  • Disability
  • Geriatric medicine
  • Multidimensional assessment
  • Psychometric methods
  • Quality of life
  • SIP

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Marchionni, N., Ferrucci, L., Baldasseroni, S., Fumagalli, S., Guralnik, J. M., Bonazinga, M., ... Masotti, G. (1997). Item re-scaling of an italian version of the sickness impact profile: Effect of age and profession of the observers. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(2), 195-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00318-6

Item re-scaling of an italian version of the sickness impact profile : Effect of age and profession of the observers. / Marchionni, Niccoló; Ferrucci, Luigi; Baldasseroni, Samuele; Fumagalli, Stefano; Guralnik, Jack M.; Bonazinga, Maura; Cecchi, Francesca; Masotti, Giulio.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 50, No. 2, 02.1997, p. 195-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Marchionni, N, Ferrucci, L, Baldasseroni, S, Fumagalli, S, Guralnik, JM, Bonazinga, M, Cecchi, F & Masotti, G 1997, 'Item re-scaling of an italian version of the sickness impact profile: Effect of age and profession of the observers', Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 195-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00318-6
Marchionni, Niccoló ; Ferrucci, Luigi ; Baldasseroni, Samuele ; Fumagalli, Stefano ; Guralnik, Jack M. ; Bonazinga, Maura ; Cecchi, Francesca ; Masotti, Giulio. / Item re-scaling of an italian version of the sickness impact profile : Effect of age and profession of the observers. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1997 ; Vol. 50, No. 2. pp. 195-201.
@article{ddad5d1ecf984617bc7c47c19d521d04,
title = "Item re-scaling of an italian version of the sickness impact profile: Effect of age and profession of the observers",
abstract = "An Italian version of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) obtained by professional and nonprofessional translators was checked for cross-cultural equivalence using a back-translation method followed by two scaling studies. The first scaling study involved 30 health professionals who ranked the items within each category for severity of dysfunction. By comparing Italian and US average ranks, 14 highly discordant items were identified. A revised translation was evaluated in a new study involving 120 observers stratified by age (<65 versus ≤ 55 years) and profession (health versus non health professionals) into 4 groups of the same size. The Italian and American item rank orders were almost equivalent, independently of the age and profession of the observers (93{\%} of the ranks showing differences <2), suggesting that this Italian version of SIP is cross-culturally unbiased. However, older age was associated with higher variability in the rank orders, and some caution is required for use in the geriatric population.",
keywords = "Disability, Geriatric medicine, Multidimensional assessment, Psychometric methods, Quality of life, SIP",
author = "Niccol{\'o} Marchionni and Luigi Ferrucci and Samuele Baldasseroni and Stefano Fumagalli and Guralnik, {Jack M.} and Maura Bonazinga and Francesca Cecchi and Giulio Masotti",
year = "1997",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00318-6",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "195--201",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Item re-scaling of an italian version of the sickness impact profile

T2 - Effect of age and profession of the observers

AU - Marchionni, Niccoló

AU - Ferrucci, Luigi

AU - Baldasseroni, Samuele

AU - Fumagalli, Stefano

AU - Guralnik, Jack M.

AU - Bonazinga, Maura

AU - Cecchi, Francesca

AU - Masotti, Giulio

PY - 1997/2

Y1 - 1997/2

N2 - An Italian version of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) obtained by professional and nonprofessional translators was checked for cross-cultural equivalence using a back-translation method followed by two scaling studies. The first scaling study involved 30 health professionals who ranked the items within each category for severity of dysfunction. By comparing Italian and US average ranks, 14 highly discordant items were identified. A revised translation was evaluated in a new study involving 120 observers stratified by age (<65 versus ≤ 55 years) and profession (health versus non health professionals) into 4 groups of the same size. The Italian and American item rank orders were almost equivalent, independently of the age and profession of the observers (93% of the ranks showing differences <2), suggesting that this Italian version of SIP is cross-culturally unbiased. However, older age was associated with higher variability in the rank orders, and some caution is required for use in the geriatric population.

AB - An Italian version of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) obtained by professional and nonprofessional translators was checked for cross-cultural equivalence using a back-translation method followed by two scaling studies. The first scaling study involved 30 health professionals who ranked the items within each category for severity of dysfunction. By comparing Italian and US average ranks, 14 highly discordant items were identified. A revised translation was evaluated in a new study involving 120 observers stratified by age (<65 versus ≤ 55 years) and profession (health versus non health professionals) into 4 groups of the same size. The Italian and American item rank orders were almost equivalent, independently of the age and profession of the observers (93% of the ranks showing differences <2), suggesting that this Italian version of SIP is cross-culturally unbiased. However, older age was associated with higher variability in the rank orders, and some caution is required for use in the geriatric population.

KW - Disability

KW - Geriatric medicine

KW - Multidimensional assessment

KW - Psychometric methods

KW - Quality of life

KW - SIP

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030890411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030890411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00318-6

DO - 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00318-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 9120513

AN - SCOPUS:0030890411

VL - 50

SP - 195

EP - 201

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 2

ER -