Knee functional flexion axis in osteoarthritic patients: Comparison in vivo with transepicondylar axis using a navigation system

F. Colle, S. Bignozzi, N. Lopomo, S. Zaffagnini, L. Sun, M. Marcacci

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: No study, up to now, has examined the effect of arthritis on pathologic subjects using functional flexion axis (FFA). The purpose of this study is to understand whether arthritis affects somehow the FFA evaluation and to assess whether the FFA could be considered a usable reference for implant positioning for osteoarthritic knees. Methods: Using a navigation system, FFA orientation was evaluated intraoperatively (computed with the mean helical axis method) in three different ranges of motion (0°-120°; 35°-80°; 35°-120°) and in two different planes (coronal and axial), for 111 osteoarthritis patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. The results were compared with a control group of 60 patients that underwent ACL reconstruction. The angle between the transepicondylar axis (TEA) and FFA was computed. Results: Results showed in arthritic knees on frontal plane, an average difference between TEA and FFA of -2.8° ± 5.0° while on axial plane it was 0.6° ± 4.7°. No statistical difference was found between the three ranges in axial view, whereas some difference was found in frontal view (P <0.0001). The TEA-FFA angle was not correlatedwith limb alignment on axial plane, while it was, even if poor, in frontal plane. In the control group, in frontal and in axial view, no statistical difference was found for the angle between TEA and FFA. Conclusions: FFA can be used as reference for implant positioning in axial plane also in pathologic knees, while for the frontal plane further investigations are required.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)552-558
Number of pages7
JournalKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Arthritis
Knee
Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Control Groups
Articular Range of Motion
Osteoarthritis
Extremities

Keywords

  • CAS
  • Knee functional flexion axis
  • Osteoarthritis
  • TKA

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Knee functional flexion axis in osteoarthritic patients : Comparison in vivo with transepicondylar axis using a navigation system. / Colle, F.; Bignozzi, S.; Lopomo, N.; Zaffagnini, S.; Sun, L.; Marcacci, M.

In: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, Vol. 20, No. 3, 03.2012, p. 552-558.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{706de431ae594a8ab15cc654ca0ff057,
title = "Knee functional flexion axis in osteoarthritic patients: Comparison in vivo with transepicondylar axis using a navigation system",
abstract = "Purpose: No study, up to now, has examined the effect of arthritis on pathologic subjects using functional flexion axis (FFA). The purpose of this study is to understand whether arthritis affects somehow the FFA evaluation and to assess whether the FFA could be considered a usable reference for implant positioning for osteoarthritic knees. Methods: Using a navigation system, FFA orientation was evaluated intraoperatively (computed with the mean helical axis method) in three different ranges of motion (0°-120°; 35°-80°; 35°-120°) and in two different planes (coronal and axial), for 111 osteoarthritis patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. The results were compared with a control group of 60 patients that underwent ACL reconstruction. The angle between the transepicondylar axis (TEA) and FFA was computed. Results: Results showed in arthritic knees on frontal plane, an average difference between TEA and FFA of -2.8° ± 5.0° while on axial plane it was 0.6° ± 4.7°. No statistical difference was found between the three ranges in axial view, whereas some difference was found in frontal view (P <0.0001). The TEA-FFA angle was not correlatedwith limb alignment on axial plane, while it was, even if poor, in frontal plane. In the control group, in frontal and in axial view, no statistical difference was found for the angle between TEA and FFA. Conclusions: FFA can be used as reference for implant positioning in axial plane also in pathologic knees, while for the frontal plane further investigations are required.",
keywords = "CAS, Knee functional flexion axis, Osteoarthritis, TKA",
author = "F. Colle and S. Bignozzi and N. Lopomo and S. Zaffagnini and L. Sun and M. Marcacci",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s00167-011-1604-z",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "552--558",
journal = "Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy",
issn = "0942-2056",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Knee functional flexion axis in osteoarthritic patients

T2 - Comparison in vivo with transepicondylar axis using a navigation system

AU - Colle, F.

AU - Bignozzi, S.

AU - Lopomo, N.

AU - Zaffagnini, S.

AU - Sun, L.

AU - Marcacci, M.

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - Purpose: No study, up to now, has examined the effect of arthritis on pathologic subjects using functional flexion axis (FFA). The purpose of this study is to understand whether arthritis affects somehow the FFA evaluation and to assess whether the FFA could be considered a usable reference for implant positioning for osteoarthritic knees. Methods: Using a navigation system, FFA orientation was evaluated intraoperatively (computed with the mean helical axis method) in three different ranges of motion (0°-120°; 35°-80°; 35°-120°) and in two different planes (coronal and axial), for 111 osteoarthritis patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. The results were compared with a control group of 60 patients that underwent ACL reconstruction. The angle between the transepicondylar axis (TEA) and FFA was computed. Results: Results showed in arthritic knees on frontal plane, an average difference between TEA and FFA of -2.8° ± 5.0° while on axial plane it was 0.6° ± 4.7°. No statistical difference was found between the three ranges in axial view, whereas some difference was found in frontal view (P <0.0001). The TEA-FFA angle was not correlatedwith limb alignment on axial plane, while it was, even if poor, in frontal plane. In the control group, in frontal and in axial view, no statistical difference was found for the angle between TEA and FFA. Conclusions: FFA can be used as reference for implant positioning in axial plane also in pathologic knees, while for the frontal plane further investigations are required.

AB - Purpose: No study, up to now, has examined the effect of arthritis on pathologic subjects using functional flexion axis (FFA). The purpose of this study is to understand whether arthritis affects somehow the FFA evaluation and to assess whether the FFA could be considered a usable reference for implant positioning for osteoarthritic knees. Methods: Using a navigation system, FFA orientation was evaluated intraoperatively (computed with the mean helical axis method) in three different ranges of motion (0°-120°; 35°-80°; 35°-120°) and in two different planes (coronal and axial), for 111 osteoarthritis patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. The results were compared with a control group of 60 patients that underwent ACL reconstruction. The angle between the transepicondylar axis (TEA) and FFA was computed. Results: Results showed in arthritic knees on frontal plane, an average difference between TEA and FFA of -2.8° ± 5.0° while on axial plane it was 0.6° ± 4.7°. No statistical difference was found between the three ranges in axial view, whereas some difference was found in frontal view (P <0.0001). The TEA-FFA angle was not correlatedwith limb alignment on axial plane, while it was, even if poor, in frontal plane. In the control group, in frontal and in axial view, no statistical difference was found for the angle between TEA and FFA. Conclusions: FFA can be used as reference for implant positioning in axial plane also in pathologic knees, while for the frontal plane further investigations are required.

KW - CAS

KW - Knee functional flexion axis

KW - Osteoarthritis

KW - TKA

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857443378&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857443378&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00167-011-1604-z

DO - 10.1007/s00167-011-1604-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 21755359

AN - SCOPUS:84857443378

VL - 20

SP - 552

EP - 558

JO - Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

JF - Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

SN - 0942-2056

IS - 3

ER -