Laboratory evaluation of the Miles H·3 automated reticulocyte counter

A comparative study with manual reference method and Sysmex R-1000

M. Buttarello, P. Bulian, A. Venudo, P. Rizzotti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. - To evaluate the performance of the new commercial Miles H·3 RTX analyzer in counting reticulocytes. Methods and Patients. - The results from the counter were compared to those obtained from microscopic methods, following the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards H44-P guidelines, and to the results from the Sysmex R-1000 counter. In total, 279 samples were analyzed in duplicate with each of the three methods. One hundred thirty-three samples were from healthy subjects, while 146 were from patients with various pathologies, 10 of whom presented with posttherapeutic aplasia of the bone marrow and 9 with iron-deficiency anemia. Results. - The reference intervals for the normal controls are different for each of the three methods (manual: 0.352.35%, 16 to 116 x 10 9/L; Miles H·3: 0.65- 2.30%, 35.1 to 112.0 x 10 9/L; Sysmex R-1000: 0.6-1.85%, 28.0 to 85.0 x 10 9/L). The overall imprecision was lower for the instruments than for the microscopic method (Miles H·3: coefficient of variation, 11.6%; R-1000: coefficient of variation, 4.2%; microscopic method: coefficient of variation, 24.2%). The Miles H·3 shows a good correlation with the other methods, yet it overestimated the low values with respect to both the microscopic method (intercept, 0.55; slope, 0.70) and the R-1000 (intercept, 0.44; slope, 0.78). This became particularly pronounced in patients with marrow aplasia. Conclusions. - Miles H·3 can produce results with an acceptable degree of accuracy. The agreement with the dedicated fluorescence-based flow cytometer R-1000 at normal and high concentrations is also good. The possibility of providing reticulocyte indices as well as erythrocyte indices (mean volume, mean hemoglobin content, mean hemoglobin concentration) and the relative dispersion indices could be useful in understanding red cell pathophysiology in normal and iron deficient patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1141-1148
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
Volume119
Issue number12
Publication statusPublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Reticulocytes
Hemoglobins
Bone Marrow
Erythrocyte Indices
Iron-Deficiency Anemias
Healthy Volunteers
Iron
Fluorescence
Guidelines
Pathology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Medical Laboratory Technology

Cite this

Laboratory evaluation of the Miles H·3 automated reticulocyte counter : A comparative study with manual reference method and Sysmex R-1000. / Buttarello, M.; Bulian, P.; Venudo, A.; Rizzotti, P.

In: Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vol. 119, No. 12, 1995, p. 1141-1148.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ba2d23812c64440ebc88b5dd1ff4dd80,
title = "Laboratory evaluation of the Miles H·3 automated reticulocyte counter: A comparative study with manual reference method and Sysmex R-1000",
abstract = "Objective. - To evaluate the performance of the new commercial Miles H·3 RTX analyzer in counting reticulocytes. Methods and Patients. - The results from the counter were compared to those obtained from microscopic methods, following the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards H44-P guidelines, and to the results from the Sysmex R-1000 counter. In total, 279 samples were analyzed in duplicate with each of the three methods. One hundred thirty-three samples were from healthy subjects, while 146 were from patients with various pathologies, 10 of whom presented with posttherapeutic aplasia of the bone marrow and 9 with iron-deficiency anemia. Results. - The reference intervals for the normal controls are different for each of the three methods (manual: 0.352.35{\%}, 16 to 116 x 10 9/L; Miles H·3: 0.65- 2.30{\%}, 35.1 to 112.0 x 10 9/L; Sysmex R-1000: 0.6-1.85{\%}, 28.0 to 85.0 x 10 9/L). The overall imprecision was lower for the instruments than for the microscopic method (Miles H·3: coefficient of variation, 11.6{\%}; R-1000: coefficient of variation, 4.2{\%}; microscopic method: coefficient of variation, 24.2{\%}). The Miles H·3 shows a good correlation with the other methods, yet it overestimated the low values with respect to both the microscopic method (intercept, 0.55; slope, 0.70) and the R-1000 (intercept, 0.44; slope, 0.78). This became particularly pronounced in patients with marrow aplasia. Conclusions. - Miles H·3 can produce results with an acceptable degree of accuracy. The agreement with the dedicated fluorescence-based flow cytometer R-1000 at normal and high concentrations is also good. The possibility of providing reticulocyte indices as well as erythrocyte indices (mean volume, mean hemoglobin content, mean hemoglobin concentration) and the relative dispersion indices could be useful in understanding red cell pathophysiology in normal and iron deficient patients.",
author = "M. Buttarello and P. Bulian and A. Venudo and P. Rizzotti",
year = "1995",
language = "English",
volume = "119",
pages = "1141--1148",
journal = "Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine",
issn = "0003-9985",
publisher = "College of American Pathologists",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laboratory evaluation of the Miles H·3 automated reticulocyte counter

T2 - A comparative study with manual reference method and Sysmex R-1000

AU - Buttarello, M.

AU - Bulian, P.

AU - Venudo, A.

AU - Rizzotti, P.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Objective. - To evaluate the performance of the new commercial Miles H·3 RTX analyzer in counting reticulocytes. Methods and Patients. - The results from the counter were compared to those obtained from microscopic methods, following the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards H44-P guidelines, and to the results from the Sysmex R-1000 counter. In total, 279 samples were analyzed in duplicate with each of the three methods. One hundred thirty-three samples were from healthy subjects, while 146 were from patients with various pathologies, 10 of whom presented with posttherapeutic aplasia of the bone marrow and 9 with iron-deficiency anemia. Results. - The reference intervals for the normal controls are different for each of the three methods (manual: 0.352.35%, 16 to 116 x 10 9/L; Miles H·3: 0.65- 2.30%, 35.1 to 112.0 x 10 9/L; Sysmex R-1000: 0.6-1.85%, 28.0 to 85.0 x 10 9/L). The overall imprecision was lower for the instruments than for the microscopic method (Miles H·3: coefficient of variation, 11.6%; R-1000: coefficient of variation, 4.2%; microscopic method: coefficient of variation, 24.2%). The Miles H·3 shows a good correlation with the other methods, yet it overestimated the low values with respect to both the microscopic method (intercept, 0.55; slope, 0.70) and the R-1000 (intercept, 0.44; slope, 0.78). This became particularly pronounced in patients with marrow aplasia. Conclusions. - Miles H·3 can produce results with an acceptable degree of accuracy. The agreement with the dedicated fluorescence-based flow cytometer R-1000 at normal and high concentrations is also good. The possibility of providing reticulocyte indices as well as erythrocyte indices (mean volume, mean hemoglobin content, mean hemoglobin concentration) and the relative dispersion indices could be useful in understanding red cell pathophysiology in normal and iron deficient patients.

AB - Objective. - To evaluate the performance of the new commercial Miles H·3 RTX analyzer in counting reticulocytes. Methods and Patients. - The results from the counter were compared to those obtained from microscopic methods, following the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards H44-P guidelines, and to the results from the Sysmex R-1000 counter. In total, 279 samples were analyzed in duplicate with each of the three methods. One hundred thirty-three samples were from healthy subjects, while 146 were from patients with various pathologies, 10 of whom presented with posttherapeutic aplasia of the bone marrow and 9 with iron-deficiency anemia. Results. - The reference intervals for the normal controls are different for each of the three methods (manual: 0.352.35%, 16 to 116 x 10 9/L; Miles H·3: 0.65- 2.30%, 35.1 to 112.0 x 10 9/L; Sysmex R-1000: 0.6-1.85%, 28.0 to 85.0 x 10 9/L). The overall imprecision was lower for the instruments than for the microscopic method (Miles H·3: coefficient of variation, 11.6%; R-1000: coefficient of variation, 4.2%; microscopic method: coefficient of variation, 24.2%). The Miles H·3 shows a good correlation with the other methods, yet it overestimated the low values with respect to both the microscopic method (intercept, 0.55; slope, 0.70) and the R-1000 (intercept, 0.44; slope, 0.78). This became particularly pronounced in patients with marrow aplasia. Conclusions. - Miles H·3 can produce results with an acceptable degree of accuracy. The agreement with the dedicated fluorescence-based flow cytometer R-1000 at normal and high concentrations is also good. The possibility of providing reticulocyte indices as well as erythrocyte indices (mean volume, mean hemoglobin content, mean hemoglobin concentration) and the relative dispersion indices could be useful in understanding red cell pathophysiology in normal and iron deficient patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029562718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029562718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 119

SP - 1141

EP - 1148

JO - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

JF - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

SN - 0003-9985

IS - 12

ER -