Laparoscopic excision of recurrent endometriomas

Long-term outcome and comparison with primary surgery

Luigi Fedele, Stefano Bianchi, Giovanni Zanconato, Nicola Berlanda, Ricciarda Raffaelli, Eleonora Fontana

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare the laparoscopic excision of primary versus recurrent ovarian endometriomas. Design: Descriptive study. Setting: Tertiary referral center for the treatment of endometriosis. Patient(s): Between 1993 and 2002, 359 consecutive patients: 305 primary surgeries (group A) and 54 reoperations for a recurrent endometrioma in the same ovary of the primary cyst (group B). Intervention(s): Laparoscopic stripping of the cyst wall. Follow-up evaluations every 6 months, including clinical and ultrasonographic evaluations and a questionnaire for pain symptoms (mean follow-up time, ± standard deviation: 35.4 ± 27.6 months). Main Outcome Measure(s): Recurrence of pain symptoms, sonographic recurrence of endometriomas, need for a new medical or surgical treatment, and reproductive outcome. Result(s): In groups A and B, respectively, the 5-year cumulative rates were not statistically significantly different: pain recurrence 20.5% versus 17.4%; ultrasonographic recurrence 18.9% versus 15.1%; retreatment requirement 19.4% versus 17.3%; and pregnancy 40.8% versus 32.4%. Although the difference was not statistically significant, compared with patients of group A, the women of group B underwent assisted reproduction techniques more frequently (50% vs. 32.2%) and had more irregular menstrual cycles associated with follicle-stimulating hormone levels ≥ 14 IU/mL in the early follicular phase (5.5% vs. 1.3%). Conclusion(s): After laparoscopic excision of recurrent ovarian endometriomas, the recurrence of pain and the reproductive outcome are comparable with those found after primary surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)694-699
Number of pages6
JournalFertility and Sterility
Volume85
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2006

Fingerprint

Endometriosis
Recurrence
Pain
Cysts
Reproductive Techniques
Retreatment
Follicular Phase
Follicle Stimulating Hormone
Menstrual Cycle
Reoperation
Tertiary Care Centers
Ovary
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Pregnancy

Keywords

  • Endometriosis
  • Ovarian cysts
  • Ovarian endometrioma
  • Recurrent endometriosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Laparoscopic excision of recurrent endometriomas : Long-term outcome and comparison with primary surgery. / Fedele, Luigi; Bianchi, Stefano; Zanconato, Giovanni; Berlanda, Nicola; Raffaelli, Ricciarda; Fontana, Eleonora.

In: Fertility and Sterility, Vol. 85, No. 3, 03.2006, p. 694-699.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fedele, Luigi ; Bianchi, Stefano ; Zanconato, Giovanni ; Berlanda, Nicola ; Raffaelli, Ricciarda ; Fontana, Eleonora. / Laparoscopic excision of recurrent endometriomas : Long-term outcome and comparison with primary surgery. In: Fertility and Sterility. 2006 ; Vol. 85, No. 3. pp. 694-699.
@article{c6c8501cdad74f758fe9cf476bad7d31,
title = "Laparoscopic excision of recurrent endometriomas: Long-term outcome and comparison with primary surgery",
abstract = "Objective: To compare the laparoscopic excision of primary versus recurrent ovarian endometriomas. Design: Descriptive study. Setting: Tertiary referral center for the treatment of endometriosis. Patient(s): Between 1993 and 2002, 359 consecutive patients: 305 primary surgeries (group A) and 54 reoperations for a recurrent endometrioma in the same ovary of the primary cyst (group B). Intervention(s): Laparoscopic stripping of the cyst wall. Follow-up evaluations every 6 months, including clinical and ultrasonographic evaluations and a questionnaire for pain symptoms (mean follow-up time, ± standard deviation: 35.4 ± 27.6 months). Main Outcome Measure(s): Recurrence of pain symptoms, sonographic recurrence of endometriomas, need for a new medical or surgical treatment, and reproductive outcome. Result(s): In groups A and B, respectively, the 5-year cumulative rates were not statistically significantly different: pain recurrence 20.5{\%} versus 17.4{\%}; ultrasonographic recurrence 18.9{\%} versus 15.1{\%}; retreatment requirement 19.4{\%} versus 17.3{\%}; and pregnancy 40.8{\%} versus 32.4{\%}. Although the difference was not statistically significant, compared with patients of group A, the women of group B underwent assisted reproduction techniques more frequently (50{\%} vs. 32.2{\%}) and had more irregular menstrual cycles associated with follicle-stimulating hormone levels ≥ 14 IU/mL in the early follicular phase (5.5{\%} vs. 1.3{\%}). Conclusion(s): After laparoscopic excision of recurrent ovarian endometriomas, the recurrence of pain and the reproductive outcome are comparable with those found after primary surgery.",
keywords = "Endometriosis, Ovarian cysts, Ovarian endometrioma, Recurrent endometriosis",
author = "Luigi Fedele and Stefano Bianchi and Giovanni Zanconato and Nicola Berlanda and Ricciarda Raffaelli and Eleonora Fontana",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.028",
language = "English",
volume = "85",
pages = "694--699",
journal = "Fertility and Sterility",
issn = "0015-0282",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic excision of recurrent endometriomas

T2 - Long-term outcome and comparison with primary surgery

AU - Fedele, Luigi

AU - Bianchi, Stefano

AU - Zanconato, Giovanni

AU - Berlanda, Nicola

AU - Raffaelli, Ricciarda

AU - Fontana, Eleonora

PY - 2006/3

Y1 - 2006/3

N2 - Objective: To compare the laparoscopic excision of primary versus recurrent ovarian endometriomas. Design: Descriptive study. Setting: Tertiary referral center for the treatment of endometriosis. Patient(s): Between 1993 and 2002, 359 consecutive patients: 305 primary surgeries (group A) and 54 reoperations for a recurrent endometrioma in the same ovary of the primary cyst (group B). Intervention(s): Laparoscopic stripping of the cyst wall. Follow-up evaluations every 6 months, including clinical and ultrasonographic evaluations and a questionnaire for pain symptoms (mean follow-up time, ± standard deviation: 35.4 ± 27.6 months). Main Outcome Measure(s): Recurrence of pain symptoms, sonographic recurrence of endometriomas, need for a new medical or surgical treatment, and reproductive outcome. Result(s): In groups A and B, respectively, the 5-year cumulative rates were not statistically significantly different: pain recurrence 20.5% versus 17.4%; ultrasonographic recurrence 18.9% versus 15.1%; retreatment requirement 19.4% versus 17.3%; and pregnancy 40.8% versus 32.4%. Although the difference was not statistically significant, compared with patients of group A, the women of group B underwent assisted reproduction techniques more frequently (50% vs. 32.2%) and had more irregular menstrual cycles associated with follicle-stimulating hormone levels ≥ 14 IU/mL in the early follicular phase (5.5% vs. 1.3%). Conclusion(s): After laparoscopic excision of recurrent ovarian endometriomas, the recurrence of pain and the reproductive outcome are comparable with those found after primary surgery.

AB - Objective: To compare the laparoscopic excision of primary versus recurrent ovarian endometriomas. Design: Descriptive study. Setting: Tertiary referral center for the treatment of endometriosis. Patient(s): Between 1993 and 2002, 359 consecutive patients: 305 primary surgeries (group A) and 54 reoperations for a recurrent endometrioma in the same ovary of the primary cyst (group B). Intervention(s): Laparoscopic stripping of the cyst wall. Follow-up evaluations every 6 months, including clinical and ultrasonographic evaluations and a questionnaire for pain symptoms (mean follow-up time, ± standard deviation: 35.4 ± 27.6 months). Main Outcome Measure(s): Recurrence of pain symptoms, sonographic recurrence of endometriomas, need for a new medical or surgical treatment, and reproductive outcome. Result(s): In groups A and B, respectively, the 5-year cumulative rates were not statistically significantly different: pain recurrence 20.5% versus 17.4%; ultrasonographic recurrence 18.9% versus 15.1%; retreatment requirement 19.4% versus 17.3%; and pregnancy 40.8% versus 32.4%. Although the difference was not statistically significant, compared with patients of group A, the women of group B underwent assisted reproduction techniques more frequently (50% vs. 32.2%) and had more irregular menstrual cycles associated with follicle-stimulating hormone levels ≥ 14 IU/mL in the early follicular phase (5.5% vs. 1.3%). Conclusion(s): After laparoscopic excision of recurrent ovarian endometriomas, the recurrence of pain and the reproductive outcome are comparable with those found after primary surgery.

KW - Endometriosis

KW - Ovarian cysts

KW - Ovarian endometrioma

KW - Recurrent endometriosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=32944461402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=32944461402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.028

DO - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.028

M3 - Article

VL - 85

SP - 694

EP - 699

JO - Fertility and Sterility

JF - Fertility and Sterility

SN - 0015-0282

IS - 3

ER -