Laparoscopic major hepatectomies: current trends and indications. A comparison with the open technique

Francesca Ratti, Federica Cipriani, Riccardo Ariotti, Fabio Giannone, Michele Paganelli, Luca Aldrighetti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Diffusion of laparoscopic major hepatectomies is experiencing a steady increasing trend, although slower compared to minor resections. The aim of this single-center study is to discuss current trends and indications in the application of minimally invasive techniques to major hepatic resections. Preoperative patients and disease characteristics of 49 laparoscopic major hepatectomies (LPS group), performed between 2005 and 2015, were compared with 585 open hepatectomies (Open group) to analyze differences in patients recruitment. Factors which were found to be differently distributed between groups were used as covariates in a propensity score-based case-matched analysis with a 1:3 ratio between LPS group and 147 patients from the Open group (constituting Open-mat group). Short-term outcome was analyzed in matched groups. ASA score, previous abdominal surgery, previous interventional procedures, indication, lesion size and associated procedures were significantly different between the LPS and the Open group. Short-term outcome analysis revealed that blood loss (200 vs 350 mL, p = 0.044) and time for functional recovery (3 vs 4 days, p = 0.05) were reduced in the LPS compared to the Open-mat group, in spite of longer length of surgery (260 vs 170 min, p = 0.041) and comparable oncological adequacy. Even though data on technical feasibility of laparoscopic major resections and their benefits in terms of blood loss and functional recovery support the diffusion of minimally invasive approach, the limit of the technique is still represented by the reduced pool of suitable candidates.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)157-167
Number of pages11
JournalUpdates in Surgery
Volume67
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

Hepatectomy
Propensity Score
Patient Selection
Research Design
Liver

Keywords

  • Indications
  • Laparoscopy
  • Major hepatectomy
  • Outcome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Laparoscopic major hepatectomies : current trends and indications. A comparison with the open technique. / Ratti, Francesca; Cipriani, Federica; Ariotti, Riccardo; Giannone, Fabio; Paganelli, Michele; Aldrighetti, Luca.

In: Updates in Surgery, Vol. 67, No. 2, 01.06.2015, p. 157-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ratti, Francesca ; Cipriani, Federica ; Ariotti, Riccardo ; Giannone, Fabio ; Paganelli, Michele ; Aldrighetti, Luca. / Laparoscopic major hepatectomies : current trends and indications. A comparison with the open technique. In: Updates in Surgery. 2015 ; Vol. 67, No. 2. pp. 157-167.
@article{7678b36687b04d38991cf4ea17a5aa31,
title = "Laparoscopic major hepatectomies: current trends and indications. A comparison with the open technique",
abstract = "Diffusion of laparoscopic major hepatectomies is experiencing a steady increasing trend, although slower compared to minor resections. The aim of this single-center study is to discuss current trends and indications in the application of minimally invasive techniques to major hepatic resections. Preoperative patients and disease characteristics of 49 laparoscopic major hepatectomies (LPS group), performed between 2005 and 2015, were compared with 585 open hepatectomies (Open group) to analyze differences in patients recruitment. Factors which were found to be differently distributed between groups were used as covariates in a propensity score-based case-matched analysis with a 1:3 ratio between LPS group and 147 patients from the Open group (constituting Open-mat group). Short-term outcome was analyzed in matched groups. ASA score, previous abdominal surgery, previous interventional procedures, indication, lesion size and associated procedures were significantly different between the LPS and the Open group. Short-term outcome analysis revealed that blood loss (200 vs 350 mL, p = 0.044) and time for functional recovery (3 vs 4 days, p = 0.05) were reduced in the LPS compared to the Open-mat group, in spite of longer length of surgery (260 vs 170 min, p = 0.041) and comparable oncological adequacy. Even though data on technical feasibility of laparoscopic major resections and their benefits in terms of blood loss and functional recovery support the diffusion of minimally invasive approach, the limit of the technique is still represented by the reduced pool of suitable candidates.",
keywords = "Indications, Laparoscopy, Major hepatectomy, Outcome",
author = "Francesca Ratti and Federica Cipriani and Riccardo Ariotti and Fabio Giannone and Michele Paganelli and Luca Aldrighetti",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s13304-015-0312-5",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "157--167",
journal = "Updates in Surgery",
issn = "2038-131X",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag Italia",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic major hepatectomies

T2 - current trends and indications. A comparison with the open technique

AU - Ratti, Francesca

AU - Cipriani, Federica

AU - Ariotti, Riccardo

AU - Giannone, Fabio

AU - Paganelli, Michele

AU - Aldrighetti, Luca

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Diffusion of laparoscopic major hepatectomies is experiencing a steady increasing trend, although slower compared to minor resections. The aim of this single-center study is to discuss current trends and indications in the application of minimally invasive techniques to major hepatic resections. Preoperative patients and disease characteristics of 49 laparoscopic major hepatectomies (LPS group), performed between 2005 and 2015, were compared with 585 open hepatectomies (Open group) to analyze differences in patients recruitment. Factors which were found to be differently distributed between groups were used as covariates in a propensity score-based case-matched analysis with a 1:3 ratio between LPS group and 147 patients from the Open group (constituting Open-mat group). Short-term outcome was analyzed in matched groups. ASA score, previous abdominal surgery, previous interventional procedures, indication, lesion size and associated procedures were significantly different between the LPS and the Open group. Short-term outcome analysis revealed that blood loss (200 vs 350 mL, p = 0.044) and time for functional recovery (3 vs 4 days, p = 0.05) were reduced in the LPS compared to the Open-mat group, in spite of longer length of surgery (260 vs 170 min, p = 0.041) and comparable oncological adequacy. Even though data on technical feasibility of laparoscopic major resections and their benefits in terms of blood loss and functional recovery support the diffusion of minimally invasive approach, the limit of the technique is still represented by the reduced pool of suitable candidates.

AB - Diffusion of laparoscopic major hepatectomies is experiencing a steady increasing trend, although slower compared to minor resections. The aim of this single-center study is to discuss current trends and indications in the application of minimally invasive techniques to major hepatic resections. Preoperative patients and disease characteristics of 49 laparoscopic major hepatectomies (LPS group), performed between 2005 and 2015, were compared with 585 open hepatectomies (Open group) to analyze differences in patients recruitment. Factors which were found to be differently distributed between groups were used as covariates in a propensity score-based case-matched analysis with a 1:3 ratio between LPS group and 147 patients from the Open group (constituting Open-mat group). Short-term outcome was analyzed in matched groups. ASA score, previous abdominal surgery, previous interventional procedures, indication, lesion size and associated procedures were significantly different between the LPS and the Open group. Short-term outcome analysis revealed that blood loss (200 vs 350 mL, p = 0.044) and time for functional recovery (3 vs 4 days, p = 0.05) were reduced in the LPS compared to the Open-mat group, in spite of longer length of surgery (260 vs 170 min, p = 0.041) and comparable oncological adequacy. Even though data on technical feasibility of laparoscopic major resections and their benefits in terms of blood loss and functional recovery support the diffusion of minimally invasive approach, the limit of the technique is still represented by the reduced pool of suitable candidates.

KW - Indications

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Major hepatectomy

KW - Outcome

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938410830&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938410830&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13304-015-0312-5

DO - 10.1007/s13304-015-0312-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 26133297

AN - SCOPUS:84938410830

VL - 67

SP - 157

EP - 167

JO - Updates in Surgery

JF - Updates in Surgery

SN - 2038-131X

IS - 2

ER -