Laparoscopic staging in women older than 75 years with early-stage endometrial cancer

Comparison with open surgical operation

Giorgio Bogani, Antonella Cromi, Stefano Uccella, Maurizio Serati, Jvan Casarin, Andrea Mariani, Fabio Ghezzi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Older age is a relevant risk factor for developing endometrial cancer (EC) and has been traditionally regarded as a relative contraindication to laparoscopy. Our aim was to analyze the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic staging in older women with EC. Methods: Consecutive women aged 75 years or older who underwent laparoscopic staging for EC between May 2002 and October 2012 were compared with consecutive women aged 75 years or older who underwent abdominal staging before the adoption of the laparoscopic approach in our institution. Postoperative complications were graded according to the Accordion Severity Grading System. Results: Fifty-nine women aged 75 years or older who underwent laparoscopy were compared with a cohort of 66 women aged 75 years or older who underwent open staging before the incorporation of laparoscopy. Demographic and disease characteristics, as well as the Charlson comorbidity index, were balanced between groups. Women who underwent laparoscopy had similar operative time (P = 0.14), lower blood loss (P = 0.005), and shorter length of stay (P <0.001) in comparison with women who underwent open surgical operation. Overall, women who underwent laparoscopy experienced less postoperative complications than women in the control group (P <0.001). In addition, focusing only on complications grade 3 or higher, we observed a trend toward decreased complication rates in the laparoscopic group (P = 0.06). No differences in survival outcomes (including time of recurrence, site of recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival) were recorded (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that EC patients older than 75 years may benefit from minimally invasive surgical operation and should not be denied laparoscopy based on mere chronological age.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)945-951
Number of pages7
JournalMenopause
Volume21
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Endometrial Neoplasms
Laparoscopy
Operative Time
Comorbidity
Length of Stay
Demography
Safety

Keywords

  • Elderly
  • Endometrial cancer
  • Laparoscopy
  • Staging
  • Survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Laparoscopic staging in women older than 75 years with early-stage endometrial cancer : Comparison with open surgical operation. / Bogani, Giorgio; Cromi, Antonella; Uccella, Stefano; Serati, Maurizio; Casarin, Jvan; Mariani, Andrea; Ghezzi, Fabio.

In: Menopause, Vol. 21, No. 9, 2014, p. 945-951.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bogani, Giorgio ; Cromi, Antonella ; Uccella, Stefano ; Serati, Maurizio ; Casarin, Jvan ; Mariani, Andrea ; Ghezzi, Fabio. / Laparoscopic staging in women older than 75 years with early-stage endometrial cancer : Comparison with open surgical operation. In: Menopause. 2014 ; Vol. 21, No. 9. pp. 945-951.
@article{dc9652943a134897bf28036ae3c0903f,
title = "Laparoscopic staging in women older than 75 years with early-stage endometrial cancer: Comparison with open surgical operation",
abstract = "Objective: Older age is a relevant risk factor for developing endometrial cancer (EC) and has been traditionally regarded as a relative contraindication to laparoscopy. Our aim was to analyze the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic staging in older women with EC. Methods: Consecutive women aged 75 years or older who underwent laparoscopic staging for EC between May 2002 and October 2012 were compared with consecutive women aged 75 years or older who underwent abdominal staging before the adoption of the laparoscopic approach in our institution. Postoperative complications were graded according to the Accordion Severity Grading System. Results: Fifty-nine women aged 75 years or older who underwent laparoscopy were compared with a cohort of 66 women aged 75 years or older who underwent open staging before the incorporation of laparoscopy. Demographic and disease characteristics, as well as the Charlson comorbidity index, were balanced between groups. Women who underwent laparoscopy had similar operative time (P = 0.14), lower blood loss (P = 0.005), and shorter length of stay (P <0.001) in comparison with women who underwent open surgical operation. Overall, women who underwent laparoscopy experienced less postoperative complications than women in the control group (P <0.001). In addition, focusing only on complications grade 3 or higher, we observed a trend toward decreased complication rates in the laparoscopic group (P = 0.06). No differences in survival outcomes (including time of recurrence, site of recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival) were recorded (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that EC patients older than 75 years may benefit from minimally invasive surgical operation and should not be denied laparoscopy based on mere chronological age.",
keywords = "Elderly, Endometrial cancer, Laparoscopy, Staging, Survival",
author = "Giorgio Bogani and Antonella Cromi and Stefano Uccella and Maurizio Serati and Jvan Casarin and Andrea Mariani and Fabio Ghezzi",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1097/GME.0000000000000202",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "945--951",
journal = "Menopause",
issn = "1072-3714",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic staging in women older than 75 years with early-stage endometrial cancer

T2 - Comparison with open surgical operation

AU - Bogani, Giorgio

AU - Cromi, Antonella

AU - Uccella, Stefano

AU - Serati, Maurizio

AU - Casarin, Jvan

AU - Mariani, Andrea

AU - Ghezzi, Fabio

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objective: Older age is a relevant risk factor for developing endometrial cancer (EC) and has been traditionally regarded as a relative contraindication to laparoscopy. Our aim was to analyze the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic staging in older women with EC. Methods: Consecutive women aged 75 years or older who underwent laparoscopic staging for EC between May 2002 and October 2012 were compared with consecutive women aged 75 years or older who underwent abdominal staging before the adoption of the laparoscopic approach in our institution. Postoperative complications were graded according to the Accordion Severity Grading System. Results: Fifty-nine women aged 75 years or older who underwent laparoscopy were compared with a cohort of 66 women aged 75 years or older who underwent open staging before the incorporation of laparoscopy. Demographic and disease characteristics, as well as the Charlson comorbidity index, were balanced between groups. Women who underwent laparoscopy had similar operative time (P = 0.14), lower blood loss (P = 0.005), and shorter length of stay (P <0.001) in comparison with women who underwent open surgical operation. Overall, women who underwent laparoscopy experienced less postoperative complications than women in the control group (P <0.001). In addition, focusing only on complications grade 3 or higher, we observed a trend toward decreased complication rates in the laparoscopic group (P = 0.06). No differences in survival outcomes (including time of recurrence, site of recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival) were recorded (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that EC patients older than 75 years may benefit from minimally invasive surgical operation and should not be denied laparoscopy based on mere chronological age.

AB - Objective: Older age is a relevant risk factor for developing endometrial cancer (EC) and has been traditionally regarded as a relative contraindication to laparoscopy. Our aim was to analyze the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic staging in older women with EC. Methods: Consecutive women aged 75 years or older who underwent laparoscopic staging for EC between May 2002 and October 2012 were compared with consecutive women aged 75 years or older who underwent abdominal staging before the adoption of the laparoscopic approach in our institution. Postoperative complications were graded according to the Accordion Severity Grading System. Results: Fifty-nine women aged 75 years or older who underwent laparoscopy were compared with a cohort of 66 women aged 75 years or older who underwent open staging before the incorporation of laparoscopy. Demographic and disease characteristics, as well as the Charlson comorbidity index, were balanced between groups. Women who underwent laparoscopy had similar operative time (P = 0.14), lower blood loss (P = 0.005), and shorter length of stay (P <0.001) in comparison with women who underwent open surgical operation. Overall, women who underwent laparoscopy experienced less postoperative complications than women in the control group (P <0.001). In addition, focusing only on complications grade 3 or higher, we observed a trend toward decreased complication rates in the laparoscopic group (P = 0.06). No differences in survival outcomes (including time of recurrence, site of recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival) were recorded (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that EC patients older than 75 years may benefit from minimally invasive surgical operation and should not be denied laparoscopy based on mere chronological age.

KW - Elderly

KW - Endometrial cancer

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Staging

KW - Survival

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906938907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906938907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/GME.0000000000000202

DO - 10.1097/GME.0000000000000202

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 945

EP - 951

JO - Menopause

JF - Menopause

SN - 1072-3714

IS - 9

ER -