Laparoscopic uterine biopsy for diagnosing diffuse adenomyosis

Paolo Vercellini, Laura Trespidi, Stefania Panazza, Tiziana Bramante, Fabio Mauro, Pier Giorgio Crosignani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the possibility of diagnosing diffuse adenomyosis with the uterus in situ. STUDY DESIGN: Myometrial needle biopsy was performed on a prospectively evaluated series of 72 women undergoing laparoscopy for infertility and/or chronic pelvic pain. Before surgery the patients completed a questionnaire on the presence and severity of dysmenorrhea according to a linear analog and verbal rating scale. A single specimen was taken from along the median line in the upper third of the posterior uterine wall using a 14-gauge Tru-cut needle inserted through the anterior abdominal wall under laparoscopic guidance. RESULTS: No complications occurred. Adenomyosis was diagnosed in 8 of the 42 subjects with menstrual pain and 5 of the 30 asymptomatic ones (19% versus 17%) and pelvic endometriosis in 27 and 10, respectively (64% versus 33%, P = .02). The frequency of moderate or severe dysmenorrhea was greater in women with adenomyosis than in those without adenomyosis or endometriosis, but the difference was not statistically significant. Conversely, menstrual pain was significantly more frequent and severe in patients with endometriosis as compared with women who had neither endometriosis nor adenomyosis. CONCLUSION: Uterine needle biopsy is simple, rapid and safe, but its overall clinical importance, as well as the predictive value of a normal histologic result, requires further investigation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)220-224
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist
Volume41
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1996

Fingerprint

Adenomyosis
Dysmenorrhea
Endometriosis
Biopsy
Needle Biopsy
Pelvic Pain
Abdominal Wall
Chronic Pain
Laparoscopy
Infertility
Uterus
Needles
Reference Values

Keywords

  • adenomyosis
  • endometriosis
  • laparoscopy
  • uterine diseases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • Reproductive Medicine

Cite this

Laparoscopic uterine biopsy for diagnosing diffuse adenomyosis. / Vercellini, Paolo; Trespidi, Laura; Panazza, Stefania; Bramante, Tiziana; Mauro, Fabio; Crosignani, Pier Giorgio.

In: Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist, Vol. 41, No. 4, 1996, p. 220-224.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vercellini, Paolo ; Trespidi, Laura ; Panazza, Stefania ; Bramante, Tiziana ; Mauro, Fabio ; Crosignani, Pier Giorgio. / Laparoscopic uterine biopsy for diagnosing diffuse adenomyosis. In: Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist. 1996 ; Vol. 41, No. 4. pp. 220-224.
@article{0981d5e7690542b4ab16f168314a9acd,
title = "Laparoscopic uterine biopsy for diagnosing diffuse adenomyosis",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To investigate the possibility of diagnosing diffuse adenomyosis with the uterus in situ. STUDY DESIGN: Myometrial needle biopsy was performed on a prospectively evaluated series of 72 women undergoing laparoscopy for infertility and/or chronic pelvic pain. Before surgery the patients completed a questionnaire on the presence and severity of dysmenorrhea according to a linear analog and verbal rating scale. A single specimen was taken from along the median line in the upper third of the posterior uterine wall using a 14-gauge Tru-cut needle inserted through the anterior abdominal wall under laparoscopic guidance. RESULTS: No complications occurred. Adenomyosis was diagnosed in 8 of the 42 subjects with menstrual pain and 5 of the 30 asymptomatic ones (19{\%} versus 17{\%}) and pelvic endometriosis in 27 and 10, respectively (64{\%} versus 33{\%}, P = .02). The frequency of moderate or severe dysmenorrhea was greater in women with adenomyosis than in those without adenomyosis or endometriosis, but the difference was not statistically significant. Conversely, menstrual pain was significantly more frequent and severe in patients with endometriosis as compared with women who had neither endometriosis nor adenomyosis. CONCLUSION: Uterine needle biopsy is simple, rapid and safe, but its overall clinical importance, as well as the predictive value of a normal histologic result, requires further investigation.",
keywords = "adenomyosis, endometriosis, laparoscopy, uterine diseases",
author = "Paolo Vercellini and Laura Trespidi and Stefania Panazza and Tiziana Bramante and Fabio Mauro and Crosignani, {Pier Giorgio}",
year = "1996",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "220--224",
journal = "The Journal of reproductive medicine",
issn = "0024-7758",
publisher = "Donna Kessel",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic uterine biopsy for diagnosing diffuse adenomyosis

AU - Vercellini, Paolo

AU - Trespidi, Laura

AU - Panazza, Stefania

AU - Bramante, Tiziana

AU - Mauro, Fabio

AU - Crosignani, Pier Giorgio

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To investigate the possibility of diagnosing diffuse adenomyosis with the uterus in situ. STUDY DESIGN: Myometrial needle biopsy was performed on a prospectively evaluated series of 72 women undergoing laparoscopy for infertility and/or chronic pelvic pain. Before surgery the patients completed a questionnaire on the presence and severity of dysmenorrhea according to a linear analog and verbal rating scale. A single specimen was taken from along the median line in the upper third of the posterior uterine wall using a 14-gauge Tru-cut needle inserted through the anterior abdominal wall under laparoscopic guidance. RESULTS: No complications occurred. Adenomyosis was diagnosed in 8 of the 42 subjects with menstrual pain and 5 of the 30 asymptomatic ones (19% versus 17%) and pelvic endometriosis in 27 and 10, respectively (64% versus 33%, P = .02). The frequency of moderate or severe dysmenorrhea was greater in women with adenomyosis than in those without adenomyosis or endometriosis, but the difference was not statistically significant. Conversely, menstrual pain was significantly more frequent and severe in patients with endometriosis as compared with women who had neither endometriosis nor adenomyosis. CONCLUSION: Uterine needle biopsy is simple, rapid and safe, but its overall clinical importance, as well as the predictive value of a normal histologic result, requires further investigation.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To investigate the possibility of diagnosing diffuse adenomyosis with the uterus in situ. STUDY DESIGN: Myometrial needle biopsy was performed on a prospectively evaluated series of 72 women undergoing laparoscopy for infertility and/or chronic pelvic pain. Before surgery the patients completed a questionnaire on the presence and severity of dysmenorrhea according to a linear analog and verbal rating scale. A single specimen was taken from along the median line in the upper third of the posterior uterine wall using a 14-gauge Tru-cut needle inserted through the anterior abdominal wall under laparoscopic guidance. RESULTS: No complications occurred. Adenomyosis was diagnosed in 8 of the 42 subjects with menstrual pain and 5 of the 30 asymptomatic ones (19% versus 17%) and pelvic endometriosis in 27 and 10, respectively (64% versus 33%, P = .02). The frequency of moderate or severe dysmenorrhea was greater in women with adenomyosis than in those without adenomyosis or endometriosis, but the difference was not statistically significant. Conversely, menstrual pain was significantly more frequent and severe in patients with endometriosis as compared with women who had neither endometriosis nor adenomyosis. CONCLUSION: Uterine needle biopsy is simple, rapid and safe, but its overall clinical importance, as well as the predictive value of a normal histologic result, requires further investigation.

KW - adenomyosis

KW - endometriosis

KW - laparoscopy

KW - uterine diseases

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029961538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029961538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8728071

AN - SCOPUS:0029961538

VL - 41

SP - 220

EP - 224

JO - The Journal of reproductive medicine

JF - The Journal of reproductive medicine

SN - 0024-7758

IS - 4

ER -