Laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation versus vaginal uterosacral ligament resection in postmenopausal women with intractable midline chronic pelvic pain: A randomized study

Stefano Palomba, Tiziana Russo, Angela Falbo, Francesco Manguso, Pietro D'Alessandro, Alberto Mattei, Achille Tolino, Francesco Branconi, Errico Zupi, Fulvio Zullo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To assess and compare the laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation (LUNA) and the vaginal uterosacral ligament resection (VUSR) in postmenopausal women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP). Study design: Eighty postmenopausal women with intractable and severe midline CPP were randomized to undergo LUNA or VUSR. Costs of two surgical procedures were assesses. Cure rate, severity of CPP, and deep dyspareunia were also evaluated after 6 and 12 months from surgery. Results: The mean cost of LUNA resulted significantly higher in comparison with VURS (2078 ± 637 versus 1497 ± 297, P <0.001). The cure rate was not significantly different between the two groups at 6 (33/40, 82.5% versus 35/40, 87.5% for groups A and B, respectively; P = 0.530; RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.78-1.13), and 12 months (27/36, 75.0% versus 28/38, 73.7%, for groups A and B, respectively; P = 0.901; RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.78-1.33) of follow-up. At same times, a significant (P <0.01) decrease in severity of CPP and deep dyspareunia was observed in both groups with no difference between them. Conclusions: Both LUNA and VUSR are equally effective surgical treatments in postmenopausal women with central CPP but VUNR is significantly cheaper than LUNA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)84-91
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume129
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2006

Fingerprint

Pelvic Pain
Ligaments
Chronic Pain
Dyspareunia
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Chronic pelvic pain
  • Laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation
  • LUNA
  • Pelvic denervation
  • Uterosacral ligament resection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • Reproductive Medicine

Cite this

Laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation versus vaginal uterosacral ligament resection in postmenopausal women with intractable midline chronic pelvic pain : A randomized study. / Palomba, Stefano; Russo, Tiziana; Falbo, Angela; Manguso, Francesco; D'Alessandro, Pietro; Mattei, Alberto; Tolino, Achille; Branconi, Francesco; Zupi, Errico; Zullo, Fulvio.

In: European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Vol. 129, No. 1, 11.2006, p. 84-91.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Palomba, Stefano ; Russo, Tiziana ; Falbo, Angela ; Manguso, Francesco ; D'Alessandro, Pietro ; Mattei, Alberto ; Tolino, Achille ; Branconi, Francesco ; Zupi, Errico ; Zullo, Fulvio. / Laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation versus vaginal uterosacral ligament resection in postmenopausal women with intractable midline chronic pelvic pain : A randomized study. In: European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2006 ; Vol. 129, No. 1. pp. 84-91.
@article{d3fe9476f9c54258be7af10a4e70a429,
title = "Laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation versus vaginal uterosacral ligament resection in postmenopausal women with intractable midline chronic pelvic pain: A randomized study",
abstract = "Objective: To assess and compare the laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation (LUNA) and the vaginal uterosacral ligament resection (VUSR) in postmenopausal women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP). Study design: Eighty postmenopausal women with intractable and severe midline CPP were randomized to undergo LUNA or VUSR. Costs of two surgical procedures were assesses. Cure rate, severity of CPP, and deep dyspareunia were also evaluated after 6 and 12 months from surgery. Results: The mean cost of LUNA resulted significantly higher in comparison with VURS (2078 ± 637 versus 1497 ± 297, P <0.001). The cure rate was not significantly different between the two groups at 6 (33/40, 82.5{\%} versus 35/40, 87.5{\%} for groups A and B, respectively; P = 0.530; RR 0.94, 95{\%} CI 0.78-1.13), and 12 months (27/36, 75.0{\%} versus 28/38, 73.7{\%}, for groups A and B, respectively; P = 0.901; RR 0.90, 95{\%} CI 0.78-1.33) of follow-up. At same times, a significant (P <0.01) decrease in severity of CPP and deep dyspareunia was observed in both groups with no difference between them. Conclusions: Both LUNA and VUSR are equally effective surgical treatments in postmenopausal women with central CPP but VUNR is significantly cheaper than LUNA.",
keywords = "Chronic pelvic pain, Laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation, LUNA, Pelvic denervation, Uterosacral ligament resection",
author = "Stefano Palomba and Tiziana Russo and Angela Falbo and Francesco Manguso and Pietro D'Alessandro and Alberto Mattei and Achille Tolino and Francesco Branconi and Errico Zupi and Fulvio Zullo",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.12.007",
language = "English",
volume = "129",
pages = "84--91",
journal = "European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology",
issn = "0028-2243",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation versus vaginal uterosacral ligament resection in postmenopausal women with intractable midline chronic pelvic pain

T2 - A randomized study

AU - Palomba, Stefano

AU - Russo, Tiziana

AU - Falbo, Angela

AU - Manguso, Francesco

AU - D'Alessandro, Pietro

AU - Mattei, Alberto

AU - Tolino, Achille

AU - Branconi, Francesco

AU - Zupi, Errico

AU - Zullo, Fulvio

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - Objective: To assess and compare the laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation (LUNA) and the vaginal uterosacral ligament resection (VUSR) in postmenopausal women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP). Study design: Eighty postmenopausal women with intractable and severe midline CPP were randomized to undergo LUNA or VUSR. Costs of two surgical procedures were assesses. Cure rate, severity of CPP, and deep dyspareunia were also evaluated after 6 and 12 months from surgery. Results: The mean cost of LUNA resulted significantly higher in comparison with VURS (2078 ± 637 versus 1497 ± 297, P <0.001). The cure rate was not significantly different between the two groups at 6 (33/40, 82.5% versus 35/40, 87.5% for groups A and B, respectively; P = 0.530; RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.78-1.13), and 12 months (27/36, 75.0% versus 28/38, 73.7%, for groups A and B, respectively; P = 0.901; RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.78-1.33) of follow-up. At same times, a significant (P <0.01) decrease in severity of CPP and deep dyspareunia was observed in both groups with no difference between them. Conclusions: Both LUNA and VUSR are equally effective surgical treatments in postmenopausal women with central CPP but VUNR is significantly cheaper than LUNA.

AB - Objective: To assess and compare the laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation (LUNA) and the vaginal uterosacral ligament resection (VUSR) in postmenopausal women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP). Study design: Eighty postmenopausal women with intractable and severe midline CPP were randomized to undergo LUNA or VUSR. Costs of two surgical procedures were assesses. Cure rate, severity of CPP, and deep dyspareunia were also evaluated after 6 and 12 months from surgery. Results: The mean cost of LUNA resulted significantly higher in comparison with VURS (2078 ± 637 versus 1497 ± 297, P <0.001). The cure rate was not significantly different between the two groups at 6 (33/40, 82.5% versus 35/40, 87.5% for groups A and B, respectively; P = 0.530; RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.78-1.13), and 12 months (27/36, 75.0% versus 28/38, 73.7%, for groups A and B, respectively; P = 0.901; RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.78-1.33) of follow-up. At same times, a significant (P <0.01) decrease in severity of CPP and deep dyspareunia was observed in both groups with no difference between them. Conclusions: Both LUNA and VUSR are equally effective surgical treatments in postmenopausal women with central CPP but VUNR is significantly cheaper than LUNA.

KW - Chronic pelvic pain

KW - Laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation

KW - LUNA

KW - Pelvic denervation

KW - Uterosacral ligament resection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750346756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750346756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.12.007

DO - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.12.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 16442203

AN - SCOPUS:33750346756

VL - 129

SP - 84

EP - 91

JO - European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

JF - European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

SN - 0028-2243

IS - 1

ER -