Laparoscopic versus abdominal approach to endometrial cancer: A 10-year retrospective multicenter analysis

Stefano Palomba, Fabio Ghezzi, Angela Falbo, Vincenzo Dario Mandato, Gianluca Annunziata, Emilio Lucia, Antonella Cromi, Martino Abrate, Giovanni Battista La Sala, Giorgio Giorda, Fulvio Zullo, Massimo Franchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to give a reality-based picture of the use of laparoscopic surgery for staging endometrial cancer patients out of the experimental setting. Methods: Consecutive data of patients with endometrial cancer who underwent laparoscopic or abdominal surgical staging in 6 Italian centers were recorded. Baseline patients and tumors characteristics, surgery performed, and safety data were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 1012 subjects (403 and 609 treated by laparoscopy and laparotomy, respectively) who received surgical stadiation for endometrial cancer were included in the final analysis. The laparoscopic approach to endometrial cancer was more commonly performed in younger and nonobese patients who had received less previous surgeries, whereas the abdominal approach was preferred for the advanced stages and rare histotypes. Irrespectively to stage, the operative time was higher for the laparoscopy than laparotomy, whereas blood loss and postoperative complications were lower in the laparoscopy group than in the laparotomy group. No difference between surgical approaches was observed in complication rates in stage I endometrial cancers, whereas they were worst in higher stages. The site, but not the incidence, of recurrences differed only for advanced stage endometrial cancers. No differences in overall, disease-free, and cancer-related survival rates were also observed. Conclusions: In the clinical practice, heterogeneous criteria are adopted to recur to laparoscopy for staging endometrial cancer. The safety and the feasibility of the laparoscopy are confirmed for stage I endometrial cancers, whereas they appear suboptimal for the advanced stages.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)425-433
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2012

Fingerprint

antineoplaston A10
Endometrial Neoplasms
Laparoscopy
Laparotomy
Safety
Operative Time
Neoplasms
Survival Rate
Recurrence
Incidence

Keywords

  • Endometrial cancer
  • Laparoscopy
  • Laparotomy
  • Surgery
  • Uterine cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • Oncology

Cite this

Laparoscopic versus abdominal approach to endometrial cancer : A 10-year retrospective multicenter analysis. / Palomba, Stefano; Ghezzi, Fabio; Falbo, Angela; Mandato, Vincenzo Dario; Annunziata, Gianluca; Lucia, Emilio; Cromi, Antonella; Abrate, Martino; La Sala, Giovanni Battista; Giorda, Giorgio; Zullo, Fulvio; Franchi, Massimo.

In: International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Vol. 22, No. 3, 03.2012, p. 425-433.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Palomba, S, Ghezzi, F, Falbo, A, Mandato, VD, Annunziata, G, Lucia, E, Cromi, A, Abrate, M, La Sala, GB, Giorda, G, Zullo, F & Franchi, M 2012, 'Laparoscopic versus abdominal approach to endometrial cancer: A 10-year retrospective multicenter analysis', International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 425-433. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0b013e318244248c
Palomba, Stefano ; Ghezzi, Fabio ; Falbo, Angela ; Mandato, Vincenzo Dario ; Annunziata, Gianluca ; Lucia, Emilio ; Cromi, Antonella ; Abrate, Martino ; La Sala, Giovanni Battista ; Giorda, Giorgio ; Zullo, Fulvio ; Franchi, Massimo. / Laparoscopic versus abdominal approach to endometrial cancer : A 10-year retrospective multicenter analysis. In: International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2012 ; Vol. 22, No. 3. pp. 425-433.
@article{9b8eea80253449d29d8995dd98caa2de,
title = "Laparoscopic versus abdominal approach to endometrial cancer: A 10-year retrospective multicenter analysis",
abstract = "Objective: The objective of this study was to give a reality-based picture of the use of laparoscopic surgery for staging endometrial cancer patients out of the experimental setting. Methods: Consecutive data of patients with endometrial cancer who underwent laparoscopic or abdominal surgical staging in 6 Italian centers were recorded. Baseline patients and tumors characteristics, surgery performed, and safety data were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 1012 subjects (403 and 609 treated by laparoscopy and laparotomy, respectively) who received surgical stadiation for endometrial cancer were included in the final analysis. The laparoscopic approach to endometrial cancer was more commonly performed in younger and nonobese patients who had received less previous surgeries, whereas the abdominal approach was preferred for the advanced stages and rare histotypes. Irrespectively to stage, the operative time was higher for the laparoscopy than laparotomy, whereas blood loss and postoperative complications were lower in the laparoscopy group than in the laparotomy group. No difference between surgical approaches was observed in complication rates in stage I endometrial cancers, whereas they were worst in higher stages. The site, but not the incidence, of recurrences differed only for advanced stage endometrial cancers. No differences in overall, disease-free, and cancer-related survival rates were also observed. Conclusions: In the clinical practice, heterogeneous criteria are adopted to recur to laparoscopy for staging endometrial cancer. The safety and the feasibility of the laparoscopy are confirmed for stage I endometrial cancers, whereas they appear suboptimal for the advanced stages.",
keywords = "Endometrial cancer, Laparoscopy, Laparotomy, Surgery, Uterine cancer",
author = "Stefano Palomba and Fabio Ghezzi and Angela Falbo and Mandato, {Vincenzo Dario} and Gianluca Annunziata and Emilio Lucia and Antonella Cromi and Martino Abrate and {La Sala}, {Giovanni Battista} and Giorgio Giorda and Fulvio Zullo and Massimo Franchi",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1097/IGC.0b013e318244248c",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "425--433",
journal = "International Journal of Gynecological Cancer",
issn = "1048-891X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic versus abdominal approach to endometrial cancer

T2 - A 10-year retrospective multicenter analysis

AU - Palomba, Stefano

AU - Ghezzi, Fabio

AU - Falbo, Angela

AU - Mandato, Vincenzo Dario

AU - Annunziata, Gianluca

AU - Lucia, Emilio

AU - Cromi, Antonella

AU - Abrate, Martino

AU - La Sala, Giovanni Battista

AU - Giorda, Giorgio

AU - Zullo, Fulvio

AU - Franchi, Massimo

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - Objective: The objective of this study was to give a reality-based picture of the use of laparoscopic surgery for staging endometrial cancer patients out of the experimental setting. Methods: Consecutive data of patients with endometrial cancer who underwent laparoscopic or abdominal surgical staging in 6 Italian centers were recorded. Baseline patients and tumors characteristics, surgery performed, and safety data were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 1012 subjects (403 and 609 treated by laparoscopy and laparotomy, respectively) who received surgical stadiation for endometrial cancer were included in the final analysis. The laparoscopic approach to endometrial cancer was more commonly performed in younger and nonobese patients who had received less previous surgeries, whereas the abdominal approach was preferred for the advanced stages and rare histotypes. Irrespectively to stage, the operative time was higher for the laparoscopy than laparotomy, whereas blood loss and postoperative complications were lower in the laparoscopy group than in the laparotomy group. No difference between surgical approaches was observed in complication rates in stage I endometrial cancers, whereas they were worst in higher stages. The site, but not the incidence, of recurrences differed only for advanced stage endometrial cancers. No differences in overall, disease-free, and cancer-related survival rates were also observed. Conclusions: In the clinical practice, heterogeneous criteria are adopted to recur to laparoscopy for staging endometrial cancer. The safety and the feasibility of the laparoscopy are confirmed for stage I endometrial cancers, whereas they appear suboptimal for the advanced stages.

AB - Objective: The objective of this study was to give a reality-based picture of the use of laparoscopic surgery for staging endometrial cancer patients out of the experimental setting. Methods: Consecutive data of patients with endometrial cancer who underwent laparoscopic or abdominal surgical staging in 6 Italian centers were recorded. Baseline patients and tumors characteristics, surgery performed, and safety data were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 1012 subjects (403 and 609 treated by laparoscopy and laparotomy, respectively) who received surgical stadiation for endometrial cancer were included in the final analysis. The laparoscopic approach to endometrial cancer was more commonly performed in younger and nonobese patients who had received less previous surgeries, whereas the abdominal approach was preferred for the advanced stages and rare histotypes. Irrespectively to stage, the operative time was higher for the laparoscopy than laparotomy, whereas blood loss and postoperative complications were lower in the laparoscopy group than in the laparotomy group. No difference between surgical approaches was observed in complication rates in stage I endometrial cancers, whereas they were worst in higher stages. The site, but not the incidence, of recurrences differed only for advanced stage endometrial cancers. No differences in overall, disease-free, and cancer-related survival rates were also observed. Conclusions: In the clinical practice, heterogeneous criteria are adopted to recur to laparoscopy for staging endometrial cancer. The safety and the feasibility of the laparoscopy are confirmed for stage I endometrial cancers, whereas they appear suboptimal for the advanced stages.

KW - Endometrial cancer

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Laparotomy

KW - Surgery

KW - Uterine cancer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858259172&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858259172&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/IGC.0b013e318244248c

DO - 10.1097/IGC.0b013e318244248c

M3 - Article

C2 - 22367321

AN - SCOPUS:84858259172

VL - 22

SP - 425

EP - 433

JO - International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

JF - International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

SN - 1048-891X

IS - 3

ER -