Laparoscopic versus open biliopancreatic diversion: A prospective comparative study

Valerio Ceriani, Tiziana Lodi, Andrea Porta, Paolo Gaffuri, Edoardo Faleschini, Oscar Roncaglia, Chiara Osio, Massimiliano Coladonato, Ahmed Elnabil-Mortada

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Bariatric surgery is playing an increasingly important role in our society. The surgical approach should be chosen in consistent with the patients' problem. The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes in patients who underwent laparoscopic Scopinaro's biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) versus open BPD in our institute experience. Methods: Eighty patients were enrolled and divided in two groups: laparoscopic group (VL) and open group (OP), with 40 patients in each group during two calendar years 2006-2007. We performed the same technique for both groups using the same staplers for anastomosis, with the same measurements for alimentary and common limbs in both groups. We compared the following variables in the two groups: operative time, intra and early postoperative complications, postoperative pain, consumption of analgesics, recovery of intestinal function, days to removal of NG tube and start of oral intake, hospital stay, and late complication-incisional hernia incidence. Results: We found statistically significant reduction in favor of laparoscopic group regarding reduction in postoperative pain, consumption of analgesics, incidence of incisional hernia, operative time, and hospital stay-with early removal of NG tube and early oral intake. We did not find any statistically significant difference regarding intra, immediate and early postoperative complications and recovery of intestinal functions. Conclusions: Laparoscopic BPD is a safe technique; has good results without affecting the duration of the intervention; and ensures less postoperative pain with rapid functional recovery, less hospital stay, and drastic reduction of incisional hernia incidence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1348-1353
Number of pages6
JournalObesity Surgery
Volume20
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2010

Fingerprint

Biliopancreatic Diversion
Postoperative Pain
Prospective Studies
Length of Stay
Recovery of Function
Operative Time
Analgesics
Incidence
Bariatric Surgery
Extremities
Incisional Hernia

Keywords

  • Bariatric surgery
  • Biliopancreatic diversion
  • Laparoscopy
  • Metabolic syndrome
  • Minimally invasive surgery
  • Obesity surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Ceriani, V., Lodi, T., Porta, A., Gaffuri, P., Faleschini, E., Roncaglia, O., ... Elnabil-Mortada, A. (2010). Laparoscopic versus open biliopancreatic diversion: A prospective comparative study. Obesity Surgery, 20(10), 1348-1353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-010-0140-0

Laparoscopic versus open biliopancreatic diversion : A prospective comparative study. / Ceriani, Valerio; Lodi, Tiziana; Porta, Andrea; Gaffuri, Paolo; Faleschini, Edoardo; Roncaglia, Oscar; Osio, Chiara; Coladonato, Massimiliano; Elnabil-Mortada, Ahmed.

In: Obesity Surgery, Vol. 20, No. 10, 10.2010, p. 1348-1353.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ceriani, V, Lodi, T, Porta, A, Gaffuri, P, Faleschini, E, Roncaglia, O, Osio, C, Coladonato, M & Elnabil-Mortada, A 2010, 'Laparoscopic versus open biliopancreatic diversion: A prospective comparative study', Obesity Surgery, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 1348-1353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-010-0140-0
Ceriani, Valerio ; Lodi, Tiziana ; Porta, Andrea ; Gaffuri, Paolo ; Faleschini, Edoardo ; Roncaglia, Oscar ; Osio, Chiara ; Coladonato, Massimiliano ; Elnabil-Mortada, Ahmed. / Laparoscopic versus open biliopancreatic diversion : A prospective comparative study. In: Obesity Surgery. 2010 ; Vol. 20, No. 10. pp. 1348-1353.
@article{f17a370f101441009beccc5b31544320,
title = "Laparoscopic versus open biliopancreatic diversion: A prospective comparative study",
abstract = "Background: Bariatric surgery is playing an increasingly important role in our society. The surgical approach should be chosen in consistent with the patients' problem. The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes in patients who underwent laparoscopic Scopinaro's biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) versus open BPD in our institute experience. Methods: Eighty patients were enrolled and divided in two groups: laparoscopic group (VL) and open group (OP), with 40 patients in each group during two calendar years 2006-2007. We performed the same technique for both groups using the same staplers for anastomosis, with the same measurements for alimentary and common limbs in both groups. We compared the following variables in the two groups: operative time, intra and early postoperative complications, postoperative pain, consumption of analgesics, recovery of intestinal function, days to removal of NG tube and start of oral intake, hospital stay, and late complication-incisional hernia incidence. Results: We found statistically significant reduction in favor of laparoscopic group regarding reduction in postoperative pain, consumption of analgesics, incidence of incisional hernia, operative time, and hospital stay-with early removal of NG tube and early oral intake. We did not find any statistically significant difference regarding intra, immediate and early postoperative complications and recovery of intestinal functions. Conclusions: Laparoscopic BPD is a safe technique; has good results without affecting the duration of the intervention; and ensures less postoperative pain with rapid functional recovery, less hospital stay, and drastic reduction of incisional hernia incidence.",
keywords = "Bariatric surgery, Biliopancreatic diversion, Laparoscopy, Metabolic syndrome, Minimally invasive surgery, Obesity surgery",
author = "Valerio Ceriani and Tiziana Lodi and Andrea Porta and Paolo Gaffuri and Edoardo Faleschini and Oscar Roncaglia and Chiara Osio and Massimiliano Coladonato and Ahmed Elnabil-Mortada",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1007/s11695-010-0140-0",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "1348--1353",
journal = "Obesity Surgery",
issn = "0960-8923",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic versus open biliopancreatic diversion

T2 - A prospective comparative study

AU - Ceriani, Valerio

AU - Lodi, Tiziana

AU - Porta, Andrea

AU - Gaffuri, Paolo

AU - Faleschini, Edoardo

AU - Roncaglia, Oscar

AU - Osio, Chiara

AU - Coladonato, Massimiliano

AU - Elnabil-Mortada, Ahmed

PY - 2010/10

Y1 - 2010/10

N2 - Background: Bariatric surgery is playing an increasingly important role in our society. The surgical approach should be chosen in consistent with the patients' problem. The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes in patients who underwent laparoscopic Scopinaro's biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) versus open BPD in our institute experience. Methods: Eighty patients were enrolled and divided in two groups: laparoscopic group (VL) and open group (OP), with 40 patients in each group during two calendar years 2006-2007. We performed the same technique for both groups using the same staplers for anastomosis, with the same measurements for alimentary and common limbs in both groups. We compared the following variables in the two groups: operative time, intra and early postoperative complications, postoperative pain, consumption of analgesics, recovery of intestinal function, days to removal of NG tube and start of oral intake, hospital stay, and late complication-incisional hernia incidence. Results: We found statistically significant reduction in favor of laparoscopic group regarding reduction in postoperative pain, consumption of analgesics, incidence of incisional hernia, operative time, and hospital stay-with early removal of NG tube and early oral intake. We did not find any statistically significant difference regarding intra, immediate and early postoperative complications and recovery of intestinal functions. Conclusions: Laparoscopic BPD is a safe technique; has good results without affecting the duration of the intervention; and ensures less postoperative pain with rapid functional recovery, less hospital stay, and drastic reduction of incisional hernia incidence.

AB - Background: Bariatric surgery is playing an increasingly important role in our society. The surgical approach should be chosen in consistent with the patients' problem. The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes in patients who underwent laparoscopic Scopinaro's biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) versus open BPD in our institute experience. Methods: Eighty patients were enrolled and divided in two groups: laparoscopic group (VL) and open group (OP), with 40 patients in each group during two calendar years 2006-2007. We performed the same technique for both groups using the same staplers for anastomosis, with the same measurements for alimentary and common limbs in both groups. We compared the following variables in the two groups: operative time, intra and early postoperative complications, postoperative pain, consumption of analgesics, recovery of intestinal function, days to removal of NG tube and start of oral intake, hospital stay, and late complication-incisional hernia incidence. Results: We found statistically significant reduction in favor of laparoscopic group regarding reduction in postoperative pain, consumption of analgesics, incidence of incisional hernia, operative time, and hospital stay-with early removal of NG tube and early oral intake. We did not find any statistically significant difference regarding intra, immediate and early postoperative complications and recovery of intestinal functions. Conclusions: Laparoscopic BPD is a safe technique; has good results without affecting the duration of the intervention; and ensures less postoperative pain with rapid functional recovery, less hospital stay, and drastic reduction of incisional hernia incidence.

KW - Bariatric surgery

KW - Biliopancreatic diversion

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Metabolic syndrome

KW - Minimally invasive surgery

KW - Obesity surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956972961&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956972961&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11695-010-0140-0

DO - 10.1007/s11695-010-0140-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 20383755

AN - SCOPUS:77956972961

VL - 20

SP - 1348

EP - 1353

JO - Obesity Surgery

JF - Obesity Surgery

SN - 0960-8923

IS - 10

ER -