Laparotomy versus laparoscopy in the surgical treatment of endometriosis

The end of an era?

G. B. Candiani, L. Fedele, P. Vercellini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors compare the efficiency of laparoscopic treatment with laparotomic surgical management of endometriosis. When the disease causes mechanical distortions and adnexal adhesions, there is an obvious explanation for infertility; in these cases laparotomic surgery has so far proved the only treatment to produce significantly valid results. No findings have yet been reported to demonstrate that cytoreduction, either pharmacological, laparoscopic or laparotomic, offers concrete advantages compared with simple observation when the disease is in the early stage.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-166
Number of pages4
JournalActa Europaea Fertilitatis
Volume20
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1989

Fingerprint

Endometriosis
Laparoscopy
Laparotomy
Infertility
Observation
Pharmacology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Laparotomy versus laparoscopy in the surgical treatment of endometriosis : The end of an era? / Candiani, G. B.; Fedele, L.; Vercellini, P.

In: Acta Europaea Fertilitatis, Vol. 20, No. 3, 1989, p. 163-166.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3cebab131fc14718bcad6bee016db431,
title = "Laparotomy versus laparoscopy in the surgical treatment of endometriosis: The end of an era?",
abstract = "The authors compare the efficiency of laparoscopic treatment with laparotomic surgical management of endometriosis. When the disease causes mechanical distortions and adnexal adhesions, there is an obvious explanation for infertility; in these cases laparotomic surgery has so far proved the only treatment to produce significantly valid results. No findings have yet been reported to demonstrate that cytoreduction, either pharmacological, laparoscopic or laparotomic, offers concrete advantages compared with simple observation when the disease is in the early stage.",
author = "Candiani, {G. B.} and L. Fedele and P. Vercellini",
year = "1989",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "163--166",
journal = "Acta Europaea Fertilitatis",
issn = "0587-2421",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparotomy versus laparoscopy in the surgical treatment of endometriosis

T2 - The end of an era?

AU - Candiani, G. B.

AU - Fedele, L.

AU - Vercellini, P.

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - The authors compare the efficiency of laparoscopic treatment with laparotomic surgical management of endometriosis. When the disease causes mechanical distortions and adnexal adhesions, there is an obvious explanation for infertility; in these cases laparotomic surgery has so far proved the only treatment to produce significantly valid results. No findings have yet been reported to demonstrate that cytoreduction, either pharmacological, laparoscopic or laparotomic, offers concrete advantages compared with simple observation when the disease is in the early stage.

AB - The authors compare the efficiency of laparoscopic treatment with laparotomic surgical management of endometriosis. When the disease causes mechanical distortions and adnexal adhesions, there is an obvious explanation for infertility; in these cases laparotomic surgery has so far proved the only treatment to produce significantly valid results. No findings have yet been reported to demonstrate that cytoreduction, either pharmacological, laparoscopic or laparotomic, offers concrete advantages compared with simple observation when the disease is in the early stage.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024792340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024792340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 163

EP - 166

JO - Acta Europaea Fertilitatis

JF - Acta Europaea Fertilitatis

SN - 0587-2421

IS - 3

ER -