Large-sliding contact elements accurately predict levels of bone-implant micromotion relevant to osseointegration

Marco Viceconti, Roberto Muccini, Marek Bernakiewicz, Massimiliano Baleani, Luca Cristofolini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Primary stability is recognised as an important determinant in the aseptic loosening failure process of cementless implants. An accurate evaluation of the bone-implant relative micromotion is becoming important both in pre-clinical and clinical studies. If the biological threshold for micro-movements is in the range 100-200μm then, in order to be discriminative, any method used to evaluate the primary stability should have an accuracy of 10-20μm or better. Additionally, such method should also be able to report the relative micromotion at each point of the interface. None of the available experimental methods satisfies both requirements. Aim of the present study is to verify if any of the current finite element modelling techniques is sufficiently accurate in predicting the primary stability of a cementless prosthesis to be used to decide whether the micromotion may or may not jeopardise the implant osseointegration. The primary stability of an anatomic cementless stem, as measured in vitro, was used as a benchmark problem to comparatively evaluate different contact modelling techniques. Frictionless contact, frictional contact and press-fitted frictional contact conditions were modelled using alternatively node-to-node, node-to-face and face-to-face contact elements. The model based on face-to-face contact elements accounting for frictional contact and initial press-fit was able to predict the micromotion measured experimentally with an average (RMS) error of 10μm and a peak error of 14μm. All the other models presented errors higher than 20μm assumed in the present study as an accuracy threshold. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1611-1618
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Biomechanics
Volume33
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2000

Fingerprint

Osseointegration
Bone
Bone and Bones
Benchmarking
Prostheses and Implants

Keywords

  • Accuracy of numerical models
  • Cementless fixation
  • Finite element analysis
  • Frictional contact
  • Hip prosthesis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Large-sliding contact elements accurately predict levels of bone-implant micromotion relevant to osseointegration. / Viceconti, Marco; Muccini, Roberto; Bernakiewicz, Marek; Baleani, Massimiliano; Cristofolini, Luca.

In: Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 33, No. 12, 12.2000, p. 1611-1618.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8f01dce1ea2a4c138995320c82137fa9,
title = "Large-sliding contact elements accurately predict levels of bone-implant micromotion relevant to osseointegration",
abstract = "Primary stability is recognised as an important determinant in the aseptic loosening failure process of cementless implants. An accurate evaluation of the bone-implant relative micromotion is becoming important both in pre-clinical and clinical studies. If the biological threshold for micro-movements is in the range 100-200μm then, in order to be discriminative, any method used to evaluate the primary stability should have an accuracy of 10-20μm or better. Additionally, such method should also be able to report the relative micromotion at each point of the interface. None of the available experimental methods satisfies both requirements. Aim of the present study is to verify if any of the current finite element modelling techniques is sufficiently accurate in predicting the primary stability of a cementless prosthesis to be used to decide whether the micromotion may or may not jeopardise the implant osseointegration. The primary stability of an anatomic cementless stem, as measured in vitro, was used as a benchmark problem to comparatively evaluate different contact modelling techniques. Frictionless contact, frictional contact and press-fitted frictional contact conditions were modelled using alternatively node-to-node, node-to-face and face-to-face contact elements. The model based on face-to-face contact elements accounting for frictional contact and initial press-fit was able to predict the micromotion measured experimentally with an average (RMS) error of 10μm and a peak error of 14μm. All the other models presented errors higher than 20μm assumed in the present study as an accuracy threshold. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.",
keywords = "Accuracy of numerical models, Cementless fixation, Finite element analysis, Frictional contact, Hip prosthesis",
author = "Marco Viceconti and Roberto Muccini and Marek Bernakiewicz and Massimiliano Baleani and Luca Cristofolini",
year = "2000",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00140-8",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "1611--1618",
journal = "Journal of Biomechanics",
issn = "0021-9290",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Large-sliding contact elements accurately predict levels of bone-implant micromotion relevant to osseointegration

AU - Viceconti, Marco

AU - Muccini, Roberto

AU - Bernakiewicz, Marek

AU - Baleani, Massimiliano

AU - Cristofolini, Luca

PY - 2000/12

Y1 - 2000/12

N2 - Primary stability is recognised as an important determinant in the aseptic loosening failure process of cementless implants. An accurate evaluation of the bone-implant relative micromotion is becoming important both in pre-clinical and clinical studies. If the biological threshold for micro-movements is in the range 100-200μm then, in order to be discriminative, any method used to evaluate the primary stability should have an accuracy of 10-20μm or better. Additionally, such method should also be able to report the relative micromotion at each point of the interface. None of the available experimental methods satisfies both requirements. Aim of the present study is to verify if any of the current finite element modelling techniques is sufficiently accurate in predicting the primary stability of a cementless prosthesis to be used to decide whether the micromotion may or may not jeopardise the implant osseointegration. The primary stability of an anatomic cementless stem, as measured in vitro, was used as a benchmark problem to comparatively evaluate different contact modelling techniques. Frictionless contact, frictional contact and press-fitted frictional contact conditions were modelled using alternatively node-to-node, node-to-face and face-to-face contact elements. The model based on face-to-face contact elements accounting for frictional contact and initial press-fit was able to predict the micromotion measured experimentally with an average (RMS) error of 10μm and a peak error of 14μm. All the other models presented errors higher than 20μm assumed in the present study as an accuracy threshold. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.

AB - Primary stability is recognised as an important determinant in the aseptic loosening failure process of cementless implants. An accurate evaluation of the bone-implant relative micromotion is becoming important both in pre-clinical and clinical studies. If the biological threshold for micro-movements is in the range 100-200μm then, in order to be discriminative, any method used to evaluate the primary stability should have an accuracy of 10-20μm or better. Additionally, such method should also be able to report the relative micromotion at each point of the interface. None of the available experimental methods satisfies both requirements. Aim of the present study is to verify if any of the current finite element modelling techniques is sufficiently accurate in predicting the primary stability of a cementless prosthesis to be used to decide whether the micromotion may or may not jeopardise the implant osseointegration. The primary stability of an anatomic cementless stem, as measured in vitro, was used as a benchmark problem to comparatively evaluate different contact modelling techniques. Frictionless contact, frictional contact and press-fitted frictional contact conditions were modelled using alternatively node-to-node, node-to-face and face-to-face contact elements. The model based on face-to-face contact elements accounting for frictional contact and initial press-fit was able to predict the micromotion measured experimentally with an average (RMS) error of 10μm and a peak error of 14μm. All the other models presented errors higher than 20μm assumed in the present study as an accuracy threshold. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.

KW - Accuracy of numerical models

KW - Cementless fixation

KW - Finite element analysis

KW - Frictional contact

KW - Hip prosthesis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033810865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033810865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00140-8

DO - 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00140-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 11006385

AN - SCOPUS:0033810865

VL - 33

SP - 1611

EP - 1618

JO - Journal of Biomechanics

JF - Journal of Biomechanics

SN - 0021-9290

IS - 12

ER -