Learning and Using Abstract Words: Evidence from Clinical Populations

Maria Luisa Lorusso, Michele Burigo, Alessandro Tavano, Anna Milani, Sara Martelli, Renato Borgatti, Massimo Molteni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

It has been shown that abstract concepts are more difficult to process and are acquired later than concrete concepts. We analysed the percentage of concrete words in the narrative lexicon of individuals with Williams Syndrome (WS) as compared to individuals with Down Syndrome (DS) and typically developing (TD) peers. The cognitive profile of WS is characterized by visual-spatial difficulties, while DS presents with predominant impairments in linguistic abilities. We predicted that if linguistic abilities are crucial to the development and use of an abstract vocabulary, DS participants should display a higher concreteness index than both Williams Syndrome and typically developing individuals. Results confirm this prediction, thus supporting the hypothesis of a crucial role of linguistic processes in abstract language acquisition. Correlation analyses suggest that a maturational link exists between the level of abstractness in narrative production and syntactic comprehension.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8627569
JournalBioMed Research International
Volume2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Learning and Using Abstract Words: Evidence from Clinical Populations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this