Linguistic intergroup bias in political communication

Luigi Anolli, Valentino Zurloni, Giuseppe Riva

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Linguistic Intergroup Bias (LIB) illustrates the disposition to communicate positive in-group and negative out-group behaviors more abstractly than negative ingroup and positive out-group behaviors. The present research examined the function of language in reinforcing this bias in political communication. To illustrate the LIB, the Linguistic Category Model (LCM) was used, including a nouns category. Because social stereotypes are usually conveyed by nominal terms, the aim was to observe the relationship between stereotypes and language in political communication. Moreover, we were interested in analyzing the psychological processes that drive the LIB. Therefore, we verified whether the LIB is more related to language abstractness than to agent-patient causality. Several political debates and interviews, which took place before the latest Italian provincial elections, were analyzed. Results suggested that the language politicians use in communicating about political groups are conceptualized as stereotypes rather than as trait-based categories. Moreover, it seems that the LIB could not be explained only at a lexical level. Social implications of the present findings in interpersonal relations and causal attribution were discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)237-255
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of General Psychology
Volume133
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2006

Fingerprint

political communication
Linguistics
Communication
linguistics
Language
trend
stereotype
outgroup
language
political group
interpersonal relation
Proxy
Interpersonal Relations
causality
Causality
disposition
attribution
Political Communication
politician
election

Keywords

  • Causal attribution
  • Discourse analysis
  • Linguistic intergroup bias
  • Persuasion
  • Political communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Linguistic intergroup bias in political communication. / Anolli, Luigi; Zurloni, Valentino; Riva, Giuseppe.

In: Journal of General Psychology, Vol. 133, No. 3, 07.2006, p. 237-255.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Anolli, Luigi ; Zurloni, Valentino ; Riva, Giuseppe. / Linguistic intergroup bias in political communication. In: Journal of General Psychology. 2006 ; Vol. 133, No. 3. pp. 237-255.
@article{653d0329cfb94fee972e9757c05e23b6,
title = "Linguistic intergroup bias in political communication",
abstract = "The Linguistic Intergroup Bias (LIB) illustrates the disposition to communicate positive in-group and negative out-group behaviors more abstractly than negative ingroup and positive out-group behaviors. The present research examined the function of language in reinforcing this bias in political communication. To illustrate the LIB, the Linguistic Category Model (LCM) was used, including a nouns category. Because social stereotypes are usually conveyed by nominal terms, the aim was to observe the relationship between stereotypes and language in political communication. Moreover, we were interested in analyzing the psychological processes that drive the LIB. Therefore, we verified whether the LIB is more related to language abstractness than to agent-patient causality. Several political debates and interviews, which took place before the latest Italian provincial elections, were analyzed. Results suggested that the language politicians use in communicating about political groups are conceptualized as stereotypes rather than as trait-based categories. Moreover, it seems that the LIB could not be explained only at a lexical level. Social implications of the present findings in interpersonal relations and causal attribution were discussed.",
keywords = "Causal attribution, Discourse analysis, Linguistic intergroup bias, Persuasion, Political communication",
author = "Luigi Anolli and Valentino Zurloni and Giuseppe Riva",
year = "2006",
month = "7",
doi = "10.3200/GENP.133.3.237-255",
language = "English",
volume = "133",
pages = "237--255",
journal = "Journal of General Psychology",
issn = "0022-1309",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Linguistic intergroup bias in political communication

AU - Anolli, Luigi

AU - Zurloni, Valentino

AU - Riva, Giuseppe

PY - 2006/7

Y1 - 2006/7

N2 - The Linguistic Intergroup Bias (LIB) illustrates the disposition to communicate positive in-group and negative out-group behaviors more abstractly than negative ingroup and positive out-group behaviors. The present research examined the function of language in reinforcing this bias in political communication. To illustrate the LIB, the Linguistic Category Model (LCM) was used, including a nouns category. Because social stereotypes are usually conveyed by nominal terms, the aim was to observe the relationship between stereotypes and language in political communication. Moreover, we were interested in analyzing the psychological processes that drive the LIB. Therefore, we verified whether the LIB is more related to language abstractness than to agent-patient causality. Several political debates and interviews, which took place before the latest Italian provincial elections, were analyzed. Results suggested that the language politicians use in communicating about political groups are conceptualized as stereotypes rather than as trait-based categories. Moreover, it seems that the LIB could not be explained only at a lexical level. Social implications of the present findings in interpersonal relations and causal attribution were discussed.

AB - The Linguistic Intergroup Bias (LIB) illustrates the disposition to communicate positive in-group and negative out-group behaviors more abstractly than negative ingroup and positive out-group behaviors. The present research examined the function of language in reinforcing this bias in political communication. To illustrate the LIB, the Linguistic Category Model (LCM) was used, including a nouns category. Because social stereotypes are usually conveyed by nominal terms, the aim was to observe the relationship between stereotypes and language in political communication. Moreover, we were interested in analyzing the psychological processes that drive the LIB. Therefore, we verified whether the LIB is more related to language abstractness than to agent-patient causality. Several political debates and interviews, which took place before the latest Italian provincial elections, were analyzed. Results suggested that the language politicians use in communicating about political groups are conceptualized as stereotypes rather than as trait-based categories. Moreover, it seems that the LIB could not be explained only at a lexical level. Social implications of the present findings in interpersonal relations and causal attribution were discussed.

KW - Causal attribution

KW - Discourse analysis

KW - Linguistic intergroup bias

KW - Persuasion

KW - Political communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748295558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748295558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3200/GENP.133.3.237-255

DO - 10.3200/GENP.133.3.237-255

M3 - Article

VL - 133

SP - 237

EP - 255

JO - Journal of General Psychology

JF - Journal of General Psychology

SN - 0022-1309

IS - 3

ER -