Long-latency auditory-evoked potentials in severe traumatic brain injury

Letizia Mazzini, Massimo Zaccala, Francesco Gareri, Andrea Giordano, Elisabetta Angelino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To detect the effects of different deviant stimuli on long-latency auditory-evoked potentials (LLAEPs) in patients with severe impairment of consciousness from traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to define their prognostic value for late functional outcome. Design: Correlational study on a prospective cohort. Setting: Brain injury rehabilitation center. Patients: Eleven volunteers and 21 consecutively sampled patients with severe TBI referred to the inpatient intensive rehabilitation unit of primary care in a university-based system. Main Outcome Measures: The LLAEPs recorded with different paradigms; and the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), Disability Rating Scale (DRS), FIM™ instrument, and Neurobehavioural Rating Scale (NBHRS). Results: N100-P150 complex showed high reliability. Patients with good outcomes showed N100 and P150 mean latencies similar to those of unimpaired patients and shorter than patients with unfavorable outcomes. When the deviant stimulus was the patient's name, N100 latency showed high correlations with DRS (p <.007), FIM (p <.01), and NBHRS (p <.009). P250 and P300 showed a low percentage of occurrence with passive paradigms in both patients and controls. Their scores were inversely correlated to the Glasgow Coma Scale (p <.03) and the Innsbruck Coma Scale (p <.003), but no significant correlations were found with functional and behavioral outcomes. Patients with GOS score 1-2 1 year posttrauma had significantly longer latency and lower amplitude of N100 and P150 than those with GOS score 4-5. Conclusions: LLAEPs can be recorded in patients with severe impairment of consciousness by means of passive paradigms. The use of a stimulus that is relevant for the patient can enhance the accuracy of the test and its relationship with functional outcome.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-65
Number of pages9
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume82
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Auditory Evoked Potentials
Glasgow Outcome Scale
Consciousness
Traumatic Brain Injury
Rehabilitation Centers
Glasgow Coma Scale
Coma
Brain Injuries
Names
Inpatients
Volunteers
Primary Health Care
Rehabilitation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Auditory
  • Brain injuries
  • Evoked potentials
  • Rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Long-latency auditory-evoked potentials in severe traumatic brain injury. / Mazzini, Letizia; Zaccala, Massimo; Gareri, Francesco; Giordano, Andrea; Angelino, Elisabetta.

In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 82, No. 1, 2001, p. 57-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mazzini, Letizia ; Zaccala, Massimo ; Gareri, Francesco ; Giordano, Andrea ; Angelino, Elisabetta. / Long-latency auditory-evoked potentials in severe traumatic brain injury. In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2001 ; Vol. 82, No. 1. pp. 57-65.
@article{7a75b7928fa4495da30b6cec8d24b3e5,
title = "Long-latency auditory-evoked potentials in severe traumatic brain injury",
abstract = "Objective: To detect the effects of different deviant stimuli on long-latency auditory-evoked potentials (LLAEPs) in patients with severe impairment of consciousness from traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to define their prognostic value for late functional outcome. Design: Correlational study on a prospective cohort. Setting: Brain injury rehabilitation center. Patients: Eleven volunteers and 21 consecutively sampled patients with severe TBI referred to the inpatient intensive rehabilitation unit of primary care in a university-based system. Main Outcome Measures: The LLAEPs recorded with different paradigms; and the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), Disability Rating Scale (DRS), FIM™ instrument, and Neurobehavioural Rating Scale (NBHRS). Results: N100-P150 complex showed high reliability. Patients with good outcomes showed N100 and P150 mean latencies similar to those of unimpaired patients and shorter than patients with unfavorable outcomes. When the deviant stimulus was the patient's name, N100 latency showed high correlations with DRS (p <.007), FIM (p <.01), and NBHRS (p <.009). P250 and P300 showed a low percentage of occurrence with passive paradigms in both patients and controls. Their scores were inversely correlated to the Glasgow Coma Scale (p <.03) and the Innsbruck Coma Scale (p <.003), but no significant correlations were found with functional and behavioral outcomes. Patients with GOS score 1-2 1 year posttrauma had significantly longer latency and lower amplitude of N100 and P150 than those with GOS score 4-5. Conclusions: LLAEPs can be recorded in patients with severe impairment of consciousness by means of passive paradigms. The use of a stimulus that is relevant for the patient can enhance the accuracy of the test and its relationship with functional outcome.",
keywords = "Auditory, Brain injuries, Evoked potentials, Rehabilitation",
author = "Letizia Mazzini and Massimo Zaccala and Francesco Gareri and Andrea Giordano and Elisabetta Angelino",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1053/apmr.2001.18076",
language = "English",
volume = "82",
pages = "57--65",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Long-latency auditory-evoked potentials in severe traumatic brain injury

AU - Mazzini, Letizia

AU - Zaccala, Massimo

AU - Gareri, Francesco

AU - Giordano, Andrea

AU - Angelino, Elisabetta

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Objective: To detect the effects of different deviant stimuli on long-latency auditory-evoked potentials (LLAEPs) in patients with severe impairment of consciousness from traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to define their prognostic value for late functional outcome. Design: Correlational study on a prospective cohort. Setting: Brain injury rehabilitation center. Patients: Eleven volunteers and 21 consecutively sampled patients with severe TBI referred to the inpatient intensive rehabilitation unit of primary care in a university-based system. Main Outcome Measures: The LLAEPs recorded with different paradigms; and the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), Disability Rating Scale (DRS), FIM™ instrument, and Neurobehavioural Rating Scale (NBHRS). Results: N100-P150 complex showed high reliability. Patients with good outcomes showed N100 and P150 mean latencies similar to those of unimpaired patients and shorter than patients with unfavorable outcomes. When the deviant stimulus was the patient's name, N100 latency showed high correlations with DRS (p <.007), FIM (p <.01), and NBHRS (p <.009). P250 and P300 showed a low percentage of occurrence with passive paradigms in both patients and controls. Their scores were inversely correlated to the Glasgow Coma Scale (p <.03) and the Innsbruck Coma Scale (p <.003), but no significant correlations were found with functional and behavioral outcomes. Patients with GOS score 1-2 1 year posttrauma had significantly longer latency and lower amplitude of N100 and P150 than those with GOS score 4-5. Conclusions: LLAEPs can be recorded in patients with severe impairment of consciousness by means of passive paradigms. The use of a stimulus that is relevant for the patient can enhance the accuracy of the test and its relationship with functional outcome.

AB - Objective: To detect the effects of different deviant stimuli on long-latency auditory-evoked potentials (LLAEPs) in patients with severe impairment of consciousness from traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to define their prognostic value for late functional outcome. Design: Correlational study on a prospective cohort. Setting: Brain injury rehabilitation center. Patients: Eleven volunteers and 21 consecutively sampled patients with severe TBI referred to the inpatient intensive rehabilitation unit of primary care in a university-based system. Main Outcome Measures: The LLAEPs recorded with different paradigms; and the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), Disability Rating Scale (DRS), FIM™ instrument, and Neurobehavioural Rating Scale (NBHRS). Results: N100-P150 complex showed high reliability. Patients with good outcomes showed N100 and P150 mean latencies similar to those of unimpaired patients and shorter than patients with unfavorable outcomes. When the deviant stimulus was the patient's name, N100 latency showed high correlations with DRS (p <.007), FIM (p <.01), and NBHRS (p <.009). P250 and P300 showed a low percentage of occurrence with passive paradigms in both patients and controls. Their scores were inversely correlated to the Glasgow Coma Scale (p <.03) and the Innsbruck Coma Scale (p <.003), but no significant correlations were found with functional and behavioral outcomes. Patients with GOS score 1-2 1 year posttrauma had significantly longer latency and lower amplitude of N100 and P150 than those with GOS score 4-5. Conclusions: LLAEPs can be recorded in patients with severe impairment of consciousness by means of passive paradigms. The use of a stimulus that is relevant for the patient can enhance the accuracy of the test and its relationship with functional outcome.

KW - Auditory

KW - Brain injuries

KW - Evoked potentials

KW - Rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035171161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035171161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/apmr.2001.18076

DO - 10.1053/apmr.2001.18076

M3 - Article

C2 - 11239287

AN - SCOPUS:0035171161

VL - 82

SP - 57

EP - 65

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 1

ER -