Long-term perimetric fluctuation in patients with different stages of glaucoma

Paolo Fogagnolo, Chiara Sangermani, Francesco Oddone, Paolo Frezzotti, Michele Iester, Michele Figus, Antonio Ferreras, Simona Romano, Stefano Gandolfi, Marco Centofanti, Luca Rossetti, Nicola Orzalesi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the long-term perimetric fluctuation (LF) in patients with different stages of glaucoma according to the Glaucoma Staging System 2 (GSS2). Methods: This multicentre retrospective study included 161 eyes of 161 stable glaucoma patients undergoing four visual-field tests (Humphrey SITA-Standard program over the central 24° or 30°) over a 2-year period. For each patient, the stage of the disease was classified according to GSS2. LF was then calculated as the mean of the standard deviations of point-to-point threshold sensitivities in the four repetitions. LF in GSS2 stages was compared using the t test. Results: LF progressively increased from stage 0 to stage 4, and then decreased at stage 5. Stage 4 had a peak of 3.19±0.94 dB, with statistically significant differences compared with all the other stages. The lowest LF (1.65±0.60 dB) was found for normal subjects, whereas similar data were found for borderline patients and those at stages 1 and 5 (2.09±0.58, 2.13±0.57 and 2.22±0.89 dB, respectively; p>0.13). Visual fields with generalised defects had a lower LF (1.90±0.81) than those with mixed (2.84±0.87, p=0.0003) and localised (2.6360.72, p=0.004) defects. Conclusions: In this study, the authors showed that the lower the visual-field defect, the lower was LF, except at stage 5 of GSS2. As test-retest changes exceeding LF could represent a sign of progression, the authors suggest that clinicians using this classification system calculate LF, in order to better differentiate true progression from variability.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)189-193
Number of pages5
JournalBritish Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume95
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2011

Fingerprint

Glaucoma
Visual Fields
Visual Field Tests
Multicenter Studies
Retrospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Cite this

Fogagnolo, P., Sangermani, C., Oddone, F., Frezzotti, P., Iester, M., Figus, M., ... Orzalesi, N. (2011). Long-term perimetric fluctuation in patients with different stages of glaucoma. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 95(2), 189-193. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2010.182758

Long-term perimetric fluctuation in patients with different stages of glaucoma. / Fogagnolo, Paolo; Sangermani, Chiara; Oddone, Francesco; Frezzotti, Paolo; Iester, Michele; Figus, Michele; Ferreras, Antonio; Romano, Simona; Gandolfi, Stefano; Centofanti, Marco; Rossetti, Luca; Orzalesi, Nicola.

In: British Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 95, No. 2, 02.2011, p. 189-193.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fogagnolo, P, Sangermani, C, Oddone, F, Frezzotti, P, Iester, M, Figus, M, Ferreras, A, Romano, S, Gandolfi, S, Centofanti, M, Rossetti, L & Orzalesi, N 2011, 'Long-term perimetric fluctuation in patients with different stages of glaucoma', British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 189-193. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2010.182758
Fogagnolo, Paolo ; Sangermani, Chiara ; Oddone, Francesco ; Frezzotti, Paolo ; Iester, Michele ; Figus, Michele ; Ferreras, Antonio ; Romano, Simona ; Gandolfi, Stefano ; Centofanti, Marco ; Rossetti, Luca ; Orzalesi, Nicola. / Long-term perimetric fluctuation in patients with different stages of glaucoma. In: British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2011 ; Vol. 95, No. 2. pp. 189-193.
@article{b777e00f43a4469cb6b3140243ec602f,
title = "Long-term perimetric fluctuation in patients with different stages of glaucoma",
abstract = "Aim: To evaluate the long-term perimetric fluctuation (LF) in patients with different stages of glaucoma according to the Glaucoma Staging System 2 (GSS2). Methods: This multicentre retrospective study included 161 eyes of 161 stable glaucoma patients undergoing four visual-field tests (Humphrey SITA-Standard program over the central 24° or 30°) over a 2-year period. For each patient, the stage of the disease was classified according to GSS2. LF was then calculated as the mean of the standard deviations of point-to-point threshold sensitivities in the four repetitions. LF in GSS2 stages was compared using the t test. Results: LF progressively increased from stage 0 to stage 4, and then decreased at stage 5. Stage 4 had a peak of 3.19±0.94 dB, with statistically significant differences compared with all the other stages. The lowest LF (1.65±0.60 dB) was found for normal subjects, whereas similar data were found for borderline patients and those at stages 1 and 5 (2.09±0.58, 2.13±0.57 and 2.22±0.89 dB, respectively; p>0.13). Visual fields with generalised defects had a lower LF (1.90±0.81) than those with mixed (2.84±0.87, p=0.0003) and localised (2.6360.72, p=0.004) defects. Conclusions: In this study, the authors showed that the lower the visual-field defect, the lower was LF, except at stage 5 of GSS2. As test-retest changes exceeding LF could represent a sign of progression, the authors suggest that clinicians using this classification system calculate LF, in order to better differentiate true progression from variability.",
author = "Paolo Fogagnolo and Chiara Sangermani and Francesco Oddone and Paolo Frezzotti and Michele Iester and Michele Figus and Antonio Ferreras and Simona Romano and Stefano Gandolfi and Marco Centofanti and Luca Rossetti and Nicola Orzalesi",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1136/bjo.2010.182758",
language = "English",
volume = "95",
pages = "189--193",
journal = "British Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0007-1161",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Long-term perimetric fluctuation in patients with different stages of glaucoma

AU - Fogagnolo, Paolo

AU - Sangermani, Chiara

AU - Oddone, Francesco

AU - Frezzotti, Paolo

AU - Iester, Michele

AU - Figus, Michele

AU - Ferreras, Antonio

AU - Romano, Simona

AU - Gandolfi, Stefano

AU - Centofanti, Marco

AU - Rossetti, Luca

AU - Orzalesi, Nicola

PY - 2011/2

Y1 - 2011/2

N2 - Aim: To evaluate the long-term perimetric fluctuation (LF) in patients with different stages of glaucoma according to the Glaucoma Staging System 2 (GSS2). Methods: This multicentre retrospective study included 161 eyes of 161 stable glaucoma patients undergoing four visual-field tests (Humphrey SITA-Standard program over the central 24° or 30°) over a 2-year period. For each patient, the stage of the disease was classified according to GSS2. LF was then calculated as the mean of the standard deviations of point-to-point threshold sensitivities in the four repetitions. LF in GSS2 stages was compared using the t test. Results: LF progressively increased from stage 0 to stage 4, and then decreased at stage 5. Stage 4 had a peak of 3.19±0.94 dB, with statistically significant differences compared with all the other stages. The lowest LF (1.65±0.60 dB) was found for normal subjects, whereas similar data were found for borderline patients and those at stages 1 and 5 (2.09±0.58, 2.13±0.57 and 2.22±0.89 dB, respectively; p>0.13). Visual fields with generalised defects had a lower LF (1.90±0.81) than those with mixed (2.84±0.87, p=0.0003) and localised (2.6360.72, p=0.004) defects. Conclusions: In this study, the authors showed that the lower the visual-field defect, the lower was LF, except at stage 5 of GSS2. As test-retest changes exceeding LF could represent a sign of progression, the authors suggest that clinicians using this classification system calculate LF, in order to better differentiate true progression from variability.

AB - Aim: To evaluate the long-term perimetric fluctuation (LF) in patients with different stages of glaucoma according to the Glaucoma Staging System 2 (GSS2). Methods: This multicentre retrospective study included 161 eyes of 161 stable glaucoma patients undergoing four visual-field tests (Humphrey SITA-Standard program over the central 24° or 30°) over a 2-year period. For each patient, the stage of the disease was classified according to GSS2. LF was then calculated as the mean of the standard deviations of point-to-point threshold sensitivities in the four repetitions. LF in GSS2 stages was compared using the t test. Results: LF progressively increased from stage 0 to stage 4, and then decreased at stage 5. Stage 4 had a peak of 3.19±0.94 dB, with statistically significant differences compared with all the other stages. The lowest LF (1.65±0.60 dB) was found for normal subjects, whereas similar data were found for borderline patients and those at stages 1 and 5 (2.09±0.58, 2.13±0.57 and 2.22±0.89 dB, respectively; p>0.13). Visual fields with generalised defects had a lower LF (1.90±0.81) than those with mixed (2.84±0.87, p=0.0003) and localised (2.6360.72, p=0.004) defects. Conclusions: In this study, the authors showed that the lower the visual-field defect, the lower was LF, except at stage 5 of GSS2. As test-retest changes exceeding LF could represent a sign of progression, the authors suggest that clinicians using this classification system calculate LF, in order to better differentiate true progression from variability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79251494769&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79251494769&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bjo.2010.182758

DO - 10.1136/bjo.2010.182758

M3 - Article

VL - 95

SP - 189

EP - 193

JO - British Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - British Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0007-1161

IS - 2

ER -