Long-term reverse remodeling by cardiac resynchronization therapy with MultiPoint Pacing: A feasibility study of noninvasive hemodynamics–guided device programming

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with multipoint left ventricular (LV) pacing (MultiPoint Pacing [MPP]) improves acute hemodynamics and chronic outcomes in comparison to conventional biventricular pacing (BiV), though MPP programming questions persist. Objectives: In this multicenter feasibility study, we evaluated the feasibility of using noninvasive systolic blood pressure (SBP) to guide MPP programming and assessed the chronic 6-month echocardiographic CRT response. Methods: Patients implanted with MPP-enabled CRT-defibrillator devices underwent noninvasive hemodynamic assessment (finger arterial pressure) during a pacing protocol that included atrial-only pacing and various BiV and MPP configurations. Each configuration was repeated 4 times, alternating with a reference pacing configuration, to calculate the SBP difference relative to reference (ΔSBP). CRT configurations with the greatest ΔSBP were programmed. An independent core laboratory analyzed baseline and 6-month echocardiograms, with CRT response defined as a 6-month reduction in LV end-systolic volume ≥ 15%. Results: Forty-two patients (71% male; LV ejection fraction 30.3% ± 7.5%; QRS duration 161 ± 19 ms; 26% had ischemic cardiomyopathy) were enrolled in 4 European centers. Relative to atrial-only pacing, the best BiV and best MPP configurations produced significant SBP elevations of 3.1 ± 4.2 (P <.01) and 4.1 ± 4.1 mm Hg (P <.01), respectively (BiV vs MPP; P <.01). Greater SBP elevations were associated with the best MPP compared with the best BiV configurations in 29 of 37 patients completing the pacing protocol (78%). Of MPP-programmed patients completing the 6-month follow-up visit, 23 of 27 (85%) were classified as CRT responders (6-month reduction in LV end-systolic volume 37.0% ± 13.6%). Conclusion: Acute noninvasive hemodynamics after CRT device implantation predominantly favored MPP over BiV programming. MPP programming guided by noninvasive hemodynamics resulted in positive LV structural remodeling.