Longing for clinical excellence: A critical outlook into the NICE recommendations on hypertension management-is nice always good?

Alberto Zanchetti, Giuseppe Mancia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The European Society of Hypertension and the European Society of Cardiology have started the preparation of the third edition of their joint guidelines on the management of arterial hypertension. The authors have focused on the new edition of the UK NICE guidelines to learn about the difficulties of disentangling evidence from wisdom when preparing recommendations. The two areas where the NICE guidelines have changed more importantly are the use of ambulatory blood pressure in the diagnosis of hypertension and the choices of antihypertensive agents to initiate treatment (less frequent use of diuretics and preference given to chlorthalidone and indapamide). NICE recommendations on these topics appear more based on opinion than evidence. Strenuous longing for evidence and clinical excellence is certainly meritorious, but such a nice approach is not always good.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)660-668
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Hypertension
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2012

Keywords

  • antihypertensive treatment
  • hypertension guidelines
  • mbulatory blood pressure monitoring
  • NICE guidelines
  • thiazide diuretics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Physiology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Longing for clinical excellence: A critical outlook into the NICE recommendations on hypertension management-is nice always good?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this