Macular thickness interoperator and intraoperator reproducibility in healthy eyes using 7 optical coherence tomography instruments

Luisa Pierro, Silvia M. Giatsidis, Elena Mantovani, Marco Gagliardi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate macular thickness measurement reproducibility using 6 new spectral-domain (SD) optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices and 1 time-domain OCT device Design: Prospective, observational study. Methods: setting: Clinical practice. study population: Macular thickness was assessed in 18 randomly chosen consecutive eyes of 18 healthy volunteers by 2 masked operators using 6 SD OCT devices and 1 time-domain OCT device. main outcome measures: Intraoperator and interoperator reproducibility of OCT-measured central macular thickness. Results: Mean macular thickness ranged from 172.77 to 272.87 μm. Intraobserver Intraclass coefficient correlation ranged from 0.75 to 0.96. Intraobserver coefficient of variation ranged from 0.44 to 2.75. In Bland-Altman analysis, interoperator mean difference ranged from 0.22 to -9.69. An analysis of variance used for repeated measurement was statistically significant for instruments (P <.001) and operators (P = .04), but not for instruments × operators (P = .32). Conclusions: The 7 OCT devices presented differing macular thickness measurement values; the lowest value was with Copernicus, and the highest was with Spectralis HRA+OCT (Heidelberg Engineering). The new generation of SD OCT devices has good intraoperator reproducibility, but the Spectralis presents the highest reproducibility together with the best interoperator agreement. The software, and in particular the algorithm, used is the most important factor regarding reproducibility differences in macular thickness measurement. The main result of our study is that macular thickness absolute value differs for each device. For this reason, the devices are not interchangeable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)199-204
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume150
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2010

Fingerprint

Optical Coherence Tomography
Equipment and Supplies
Equipment Design
Observer Variation
Observational Studies
Analysis of Variance
Healthy Volunteers
Software
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Prospective Studies
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Macular thickness interoperator and intraoperator reproducibility in healthy eyes using 7 optical coherence tomography instruments. / Pierro, Luisa; Giatsidis, Silvia M.; Mantovani, Elena; Gagliardi, Marco.

In: American Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 150, No. 2, 08.2010, p. 199-204.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{447e71cad29544f29bb0a694226709f6,
title = "Macular thickness interoperator and intraoperator reproducibility in healthy eyes using 7 optical coherence tomography instruments",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate macular thickness measurement reproducibility using 6 new spectral-domain (SD) optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices and 1 time-domain OCT device Design: Prospective, observational study. Methods: setting: Clinical practice. study population: Macular thickness was assessed in 18 randomly chosen consecutive eyes of 18 healthy volunteers by 2 masked operators using 6 SD OCT devices and 1 time-domain OCT device. main outcome measures: Intraoperator and interoperator reproducibility of OCT-measured central macular thickness. Results: Mean macular thickness ranged from 172.77 to 272.87 μm. Intraobserver Intraclass coefficient correlation ranged from 0.75 to 0.96. Intraobserver coefficient of variation ranged from 0.44 to 2.75. In Bland-Altman analysis, interoperator mean difference ranged from 0.22 to -9.69. An analysis of variance used for repeated measurement was statistically significant for instruments (P <.001) and operators (P = .04), but not for instruments × operators (P = .32). Conclusions: The 7 OCT devices presented differing macular thickness measurement values; the lowest value was with Copernicus, and the highest was with Spectralis HRA+OCT (Heidelberg Engineering). The new generation of SD OCT devices has good intraoperator reproducibility, but the Spectralis presents the highest reproducibility together with the best interoperator agreement. The software, and in particular the algorithm, used is the most important factor regarding reproducibility differences in macular thickness measurement. The main result of our study is that macular thickness absolute value differs for each device. For this reason, the devices are not interchangeable.",
author = "Luisa Pierro and Giatsidis, {Silvia M.} and Elena Mantovani and Marco Gagliardi",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajo.2010.03.015",
language = "English",
volume = "150",
pages = "199--204",
journal = "American Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0002-9394",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Macular thickness interoperator and intraoperator reproducibility in healthy eyes using 7 optical coherence tomography instruments

AU - Pierro, Luisa

AU - Giatsidis, Silvia M.

AU - Mantovani, Elena

AU - Gagliardi, Marco

PY - 2010/8

Y1 - 2010/8

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate macular thickness measurement reproducibility using 6 new spectral-domain (SD) optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices and 1 time-domain OCT device Design: Prospective, observational study. Methods: setting: Clinical practice. study population: Macular thickness was assessed in 18 randomly chosen consecutive eyes of 18 healthy volunteers by 2 masked operators using 6 SD OCT devices and 1 time-domain OCT device. main outcome measures: Intraoperator and interoperator reproducibility of OCT-measured central macular thickness. Results: Mean macular thickness ranged from 172.77 to 272.87 μm. Intraobserver Intraclass coefficient correlation ranged from 0.75 to 0.96. Intraobserver coefficient of variation ranged from 0.44 to 2.75. In Bland-Altman analysis, interoperator mean difference ranged from 0.22 to -9.69. An analysis of variance used for repeated measurement was statistically significant for instruments (P <.001) and operators (P = .04), but not for instruments × operators (P = .32). Conclusions: The 7 OCT devices presented differing macular thickness measurement values; the lowest value was with Copernicus, and the highest was with Spectralis HRA+OCT (Heidelberg Engineering). The new generation of SD OCT devices has good intraoperator reproducibility, but the Spectralis presents the highest reproducibility together with the best interoperator agreement. The software, and in particular the algorithm, used is the most important factor regarding reproducibility differences in macular thickness measurement. The main result of our study is that macular thickness absolute value differs for each device. For this reason, the devices are not interchangeable.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate macular thickness measurement reproducibility using 6 new spectral-domain (SD) optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices and 1 time-domain OCT device Design: Prospective, observational study. Methods: setting: Clinical practice. study population: Macular thickness was assessed in 18 randomly chosen consecutive eyes of 18 healthy volunteers by 2 masked operators using 6 SD OCT devices and 1 time-domain OCT device. main outcome measures: Intraoperator and interoperator reproducibility of OCT-measured central macular thickness. Results: Mean macular thickness ranged from 172.77 to 272.87 μm. Intraobserver Intraclass coefficient correlation ranged from 0.75 to 0.96. Intraobserver coefficient of variation ranged from 0.44 to 2.75. In Bland-Altman analysis, interoperator mean difference ranged from 0.22 to -9.69. An analysis of variance used for repeated measurement was statistically significant for instruments (P <.001) and operators (P = .04), but not for instruments × operators (P = .32). Conclusions: The 7 OCT devices presented differing macular thickness measurement values; the lowest value was with Copernicus, and the highest was with Spectralis HRA+OCT (Heidelberg Engineering). The new generation of SD OCT devices has good intraoperator reproducibility, but the Spectralis presents the highest reproducibility together with the best interoperator agreement. The software, and in particular the algorithm, used is the most important factor regarding reproducibility differences in macular thickness measurement. The main result of our study is that macular thickness absolute value differs for each device. For this reason, the devices are not interchangeable.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955500358&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955500358&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.03.015

DO - 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.03.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 20570233

AN - SCOPUS:77955500358

VL - 150

SP - 199

EP - 204

JO - American Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - American Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0002-9394

IS - 2

ER -