Magnetic resonance angiography versus 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in large vessel vasculitis

Daniel Blockmans, Raashid Luqmani, Lucia Spaggiari, Carlo Salvarani

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

With advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of large vessel vasculitides, we recognise the persistence of inflammation in large vessels, sometimes despite therapy to control clinical symptoms. Achieving an early diagnosis and establishing the extent of disease are important steps in improving our management of these diseases. Imaging is playing an increasing role in the assessment of these patients from diagnosis to prognosis. We review the current and potential role of two important and potentially complementary imaging techniques of magnetic resonance angiography and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of patients with giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102405
JournalAutoimmunity Reviews
Volume18
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2019

Keywords

  • 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography
  • Aneurysms
  • Giant cell arteritis
  • Large vessel vasculitis
  • Magnetic resonance angiography
  • Takayasu arteritis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Magnetic resonance angiography versus 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in large vessel vasculitis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this