Defectos congénitos mayores en reproducción asistida

Translated title of the contribution: Major congenital defects in assisted reproduction

G. B. La Sala, A. Gallinelli, G. Nucera, M. T. Villani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Since the beginning, the possibility of in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) causing congenital malformations has been frequently suggested but, untill now, it has been never directly confirmed. Moreover, the introduction of new techniques, such as the cryopreservation of gametes and/or embryos, have strengthened this item. Recent studies seem to indicate that the incidence of major birth defects or chromosomal anomalies in IVF and ICSI is not higher than that observed in spontaneous pregnancies. Our data, referred to 577 liveborns by IVF and 487 liveborns by ICSI all along ten years (1992-2002), have shown an incidence of 2% and 1.6% major birth defects respectively, confirming, the findings reported in recent meta-analyses. In terms of developmental outcome, the follow-up at 12-24 months of age did not show any significant difference between children born after ICSI and spontaneous conceivements. In conclusion, even though further studies on larger cohort of subjects must be carried out to obtain a definitive answer about this crucial issue, our findings seem to confirm that IVF and ICSI must be actually considered techniques not correlated with an increment of major birth defects or with inheritance of parental chromosomal anomalies.

Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)59-67
Number of pages9
JournalCuadernos de Medicina Reproductiva
Volume10
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injections
Reproduction
Fertilization in Vitro
Cryopreservation
Incidence
Germ Cells
Meta-Analysis
Embryonic Structures
Pregnancy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

La Sala, G. B., Gallinelli, A., Nucera, G., & Villani, M. T. (2004). Defectos congénitos mayores en reproducción asistida. Cuadernos de Medicina Reproductiva, 10(1), 59-67.

Defectos congénitos mayores en reproducción asistida. / La Sala, G. B.; Gallinelli, A.; Nucera, G.; Villani, M. T.

In: Cuadernos de Medicina Reproductiva, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2004, p. 59-67.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

La Sala, GB, Gallinelli, A, Nucera, G & Villani, MT 2004, 'Defectos congénitos mayores en reproducción asistida', Cuadernos de Medicina Reproductiva, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 59-67.
La Sala, G. B. ; Gallinelli, A. ; Nucera, G. ; Villani, M. T. / Defectos congénitos mayores en reproducción asistida. In: Cuadernos de Medicina Reproductiva. 2004 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 59-67.
@article{e9a57c58722743ae976d4893828c9574,
title = "Defectos cong{\'e}nitos mayores en reproducci{\'o}n asistida",
abstract = "Since the beginning, the possibility of in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) causing congenital malformations has been frequently suggested but, untill now, it has been never directly confirmed. Moreover, the introduction of new techniques, such as the cryopreservation of gametes and/or embryos, have strengthened this item. Recent studies seem to indicate that the incidence of major birth defects or chromosomal anomalies in IVF and ICSI is not higher than that observed in spontaneous pregnancies. Our data, referred to 577 liveborns by IVF and 487 liveborns by ICSI all along ten years (1992-2002), have shown an incidence of 2{\%} and 1.6{\%} major birth defects respectively, confirming, the findings reported in recent meta-analyses. In terms of developmental outcome, the follow-up at 12-24 months of age did not show any significant difference between children born after ICSI and spontaneous conceivements. In conclusion, even though further studies on larger cohort of subjects must be carried out to obtain a definitive answer about this crucial issue, our findings seem to confirm that IVF and ICSI must be actually considered techniques not correlated with an increment of major birth defects or with inheritance of parental chromosomal anomalies.",
author = "{La Sala}, {G. B.} and A. Gallinelli and G. Nucera and Villani, {M. T.}",
year = "2004",
language = "Spagnolo",
volume = "10",
pages = "59--67",
journal = "Cuadernos de Medicina Reproductiva",
issn = "1135-0970",
publisher = "Adalia Farma",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defectos congénitos mayores en reproducción asistida

AU - La Sala, G. B.

AU - Gallinelli, A.

AU - Nucera, G.

AU - Villani, M. T.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Since the beginning, the possibility of in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) causing congenital malformations has been frequently suggested but, untill now, it has been never directly confirmed. Moreover, the introduction of new techniques, such as the cryopreservation of gametes and/or embryos, have strengthened this item. Recent studies seem to indicate that the incidence of major birth defects or chromosomal anomalies in IVF and ICSI is not higher than that observed in spontaneous pregnancies. Our data, referred to 577 liveborns by IVF and 487 liveborns by ICSI all along ten years (1992-2002), have shown an incidence of 2% and 1.6% major birth defects respectively, confirming, the findings reported in recent meta-analyses. In terms of developmental outcome, the follow-up at 12-24 months of age did not show any significant difference between children born after ICSI and spontaneous conceivements. In conclusion, even though further studies on larger cohort of subjects must be carried out to obtain a definitive answer about this crucial issue, our findings seem to confirm that IVF and ICSI must be actually considered techniques not correlated with an increment of major birth defects or with inheritance of parental chromosomal anomalies.

AB - Since the beginning, the possibility of in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) causing congenital malformations has been frequently suggested but, untill now, it has been never directly confirmed. Moreover, the introduction of new techniques, such as the cryopreservation of gametes and/or embryos, have strengthened this item. Recent studies seem to indicate that the incidence of major birth defects or chromosomal anomalies in IVF and ICSI is not higher than that observed in spontaneous pregnancies. Our data, referred to 577 liveborns by IVF and 487 liveborns by ICSI all along ten years (1992-2002), have shown an incidence of 2% and 1.6% major birth defects respectively, confirming, the findings reported in recent meta-analyses. In terms of developmental outcome, the follow-up at 12-24 months of age did not show any significant difference between children born after ICSI and spontaneous conceivements. In conclusion, even though further studies on larger cohort of subjects must be carried out to obtain a definitive answer about this crucial issue, our findings seem to confirm that IVF and ICSI must be actually considered techniques not correlated with an increment of major birth defects or with inheritance of parental chromosomal anomalies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=7244242438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=7244242438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Articolo

AN - SCOPUS:7244242438

VL - 10

SP - 59

EP - 67

JO - Cuadernos de Medicina Reproductiva

JF - Cuadernos de Medicina Reproductiva

SN - 1135-0970

IS - 1

ER -