Male-male interference in a reproductive context: Effect of social status in mice

Francesca R. D’Amato

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Direct competition between males in a sexual context was tested in stable male pairs. Albino male mice were exposed to their male antagonist interacting with a female on the other side of a transparent plexiglas partition provided with small holes.The behavioural response of males varied according to their social status, dominant males being more activated by the experimental procedure than subordinate males. In addition, the stimuli that elicited the dominant male’s attention seemed unrelated to the female, but to the simultaneous presence of the female and the male antagonist. In a second experiment, the behavioural performance of males of different rank was evaluated when only one female was introduced into their home-cage, or when an additional female was introduced into the home-cage of the male antagonists, with the males separated by a partition. This experiment indicated that the dominant male’s interest in the female was markedly reduced and exploration of the partition was enhanced when two females were involved in the experimental procedure. In contrast, the subordinate males’ behaviour was unmodified. These data support the initial hypothesis suggesting that dominant males continue to exert a control over the subordinate male’s behaviour in mating contexts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)295-306
Number of pages12
JournalEthology Ecology and Evolution
Volume3
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1991

Keywords

  • Displacement activities
  • Dominant male control
  • Female presence
  • Mice
  • Sexual competition
  • Social rank
  • Subordinate male behavioural inhibition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Male-male interference in a reproductive context: Effect of social status in mice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this