Management of Acute Cerebellar Infarction

One Institution's Experience

Antonino Raco, Emanuela Caroli, Alessandra Isidori, Tommaso Vangelista, Maurizio Salvati, Michael T. Lawton, Daniel L. Barrow, R. Loch Macdonald, Christopher S. Ogilvy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The management of cerebellar infarctions is controversial. The aim of this study was to determine which patients require surgical treatment and which surgical procedure should be performed when a patient with a cerebellar infarction exhibits progressive neurological deterioration. METHODS: A total of 44 patients (24 male and 20 female patients; average age, 56 yr) were treated at our institution for cerebellar infarctions in the past 8 years. Twenty-five patients received conservative treatment; two patients who were deeply comatose received no treatment. The remaining 17 patients underwent emergency surgery. Of those 17 patients, 8 underwent external ventricular drainage alone, 5 underwent external ventricular drainage as the first treatment plus secondary suboccipital craniectomy, and 4 underwent suboccipital craniectomy, with removal of necrotic tissue, as the first treatment. RESULTS: Of the 25 conservatively treated patients, 20 experienced good outcomes, 4 experienced moderate outcomes, and 1 died as a result of pulmonary embolism. Of the 17 surgically treated patients, 10 experienced good functional recoveries (7 treated with external ventricular drainage only and 3 treated with drainage followed by suboccipital craniectomy) and 3 survived with mild neurological deficits (one patient underwent ventriculostomy, one suboccipital craniectomy plus external ventricular drainage, and one suboccipital craniectomy only). The overall mortality rate was 13.6% (6 of 44 patients). CONCLUSION: For patients with worsening levels of consciousness and radio-logically evident ventricular enlargement, we recommend external ventricular drainage. We reserve surgical resection of necrotic tissue for patients whose clinical status worsens despite ventriculostomy, those for whom worsening is accompanied by signs of brainstem compression, and those with tight posterior fossae.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1061-1066
Number of pages6
JournalNeurosurgery
Volume53
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2003

Fingerprint

Infarction
Drainage
Ventriculostomy
Therapeutics
Coma
Consciousness
Radio
Pulmonary Embolism
Brain Stem
Emergencies

Keywords

  • Brainstem compression
  • Cerebellar infarction
  • Treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Raco, A., Caroli, E., Isidori, A., Vangelista, T., Salvati, M., Lawton, M. T., ... Ogilvy, C. S. (2003). Management of Acute Cerebellar Infarction: One Institution's Experience. Neurosurgery, 53(5), 1061-1066.

Management of Acute Cerebellar Infarction : One Institution's Experience. / Raco, Antonino; Caroli, Emanuela; Isidori, Alessandra; Vangelista, Tommaso; Salvati, Maurizio; Lawton, Michael T.; Barrow, Daniel L.; Macdonald, R. Loch; Ogilvy, Christopher S.

In: Neurosurgery, Vol. 53, No. 5, 11.2003, p. 1061-1066.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Raco, A, Caroli, E, Isidori, A, Vangelista, T, Salvati, M, Lawton, MT, Barrow, DL, Macdonald, RL & Ogilvy, CS 2003, 'Management of Acute Cerebellar Infarction: One Institution's Experience', Neurosurgery, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1061-1066.
Raco A, Caroli E, Isidori A, Vangelista T, Salvati M, Lawton MT et al. Management of Acute Cerebellar Infarction: One Institution's Experience. Neurosurgery. 2003 Nov;53(5):1061-1066.
Raco, Antonino ; Caroli, Emanuela ; Isidori, Alessandra ; Vangelista, Tommaso ; Salvati, Maurizio ; Lawton, Michael T. ; Barrow, Daniel L. ; Macdonald, R. Loch ; Ogilvy, Christopher S. / Management of Acute Cerebellar Infarction : One Institution's Experience. In: Neurosurgery. 2003 ; Vol. 53, No. 5. pp. 1061-1066.
@article{f261a6c5f6664cb4a59effc7d9f5eaf6,
title = "Management of Acute Cerebellar Infarction: One Institution's Experience",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The management of cerebellar infarctions is controversial. The aim of this study was to determine which patients require surgical treatment and which surgical procedure should be performed when a patient with a cerebellar infarction exhibits progressive neurological deterioration. METHODS: A total of 44 patients (24 male and 20 female patients; average age, 56 yr) were treated at our institution for cerebellar infarctions in the past 8 years. Twenty-five patients received conservative treatment; two patients who were deeply comatose received no treatment. The remaining 17 patients underwent emergency surgery. Of those 17 patients, 8 underwent external ventricular drainage alone, 5 underwent external ventricular drainage as the first treatment plus secondary suboccipital craniectomy, and 4 underwent suboccipital craniectomy, with removal of necrotic tissue, as the first treatment. RESULTS: Of the 25 conservatively treated patients, 20 experienced good outcomes, 4 experienced moderate outcomes, and 1 died as a result of pulmonary embolism. Of the 17 surgically treated patients, 10 experienced good functional recoveries (7 treated with external ventricular drainage only and 3 treated with drainage followed by suboccipital craniectomy) and 3 survived with mild neurological deficits (one patient underwent ventriculostomy, one suboccipital craniectomy plus external ventricular drainage, and one suboccipital craniectomy only). The overall mortality rate was 13.6{\%} (6 of 44 patients). CONCLUSION: For patients with worsening levels of consciousness and radio-logically evident ventricular enlargement, we recommend external ventricular drainage. We reserve surgical resection of necrotic tissue for patients whose clinical status worsens despite ventriculostomy, those for whom worsening is accompanied by signs of brainstem compression, and those with tight posterior fossae.",
keywords = "Brainstem compression, Cerebellar infarction, Treatment",
author = "Antonino Raco and Emanuela Caroli and Alessandra Isidori and Tommaso Vangelista and Maurizio Salvati and Lawton, {Michael T.} and Barrow, {Daniel L.} and Macdonald, {R. Loch} and Ogilvy, {Christopher S.}",
year = "2003",
month = "11",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "1061--1066",
journal = "Neurosurgery",
issn = "0148-396X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management of Acute Cerebellar Infarction

T2 - One Institution's Experience

AU - Raco, Antonino

AU - Caroli, Emanuela

AU - Isidori, Alessandra

AU - Vangelista, Tommaso

AU - Salvati, Maurizio

AU - Lawton, Michael T.

AU - Barrow, Daniel L.

AU - Macdonald, R. Loch

AU - Ogilvy, Christopher S.

PY - 2003/11

Y1 - 2003/11

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The management of cerebellar infarctions is controversial. The aim of this study was to determine which patients require surgical treatment and which surgical procedure should be performed when a patient with a cerebellar infarction exhibits progressive neurological deterioration. METHODS: A total of 44 patients (24 male and 20 female patients; average age, 56 yr) were treated at our institution for cerebellar infarctions in the past 8 years. Twenty-five patients received conservative treatment; two patients who were deeply comatose received no treatment. The remaining 17 patients underwent emergency surgery. Of those 17 patients, 8 underwent external ventricular drainage alone, 5 underwent external ventricular drainage as the first treatment plus secondary suboccipital craniectomy, and 4 underwent suboccipital craniectomy, with removal of necrotic tissue, as the first treatment. RESULTS: Of the 25 conservatively treated patients, 20 experienced good outcomes, 4 experienced moderate outcomes, and 1 died as a result of pulmonary embolism. Of the 17 surgically treated patients, 10 experienced good functional recoveries (7 treated with external ventricular drainage only and 3 treated with drainage followed by suboccipital craniectomy) and 3 survived with mild neurological deficits (one patient underwent ventriculostomy, one suboccipital craniectomy plus external ventricular drainage, and one suboccipital craniectomy only). The overall mortality rate was 13.6% (6 of 44 patients). CONCLUSION: For patients with worsening levels of consciousness and radio-logically evident ventricular enlargement, we recommend external ventricular drainage. We reserve surgical resection of necrotic tissue for patients whose clinical status worsens despite ventriculostomy, those for whom worsening is accompanied by signs of brainstem compression, and those with tight posterior fossae.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The management of cerebellar infarctions is controversial. The aim of this study was to determine which patients require surgical treatment and which surgical procedure should be performed when a patient with a cerebellar infarction exhibits progressive neurological deterioration. METHODS: A total of 44 patients (24 male and 20 female patients; average age, 56 yr) were treated at our institution for cerebellar infarctions in the past 8 years. Twenty-five patients received conservative treatment; two patients who were deeply comatose received no treatment. The remaining 17 patients underwent emergency surgery. Of those 17 patients, 8 underwent external ventricular drainage alone, 5 underwent external ventricular drainage as the first treatment plus secondary suboccipital craniectomy, and 4 underwent suboccipital craniectomy, with removal of necrotic tissue, as the first treatment. RESULTS: Of the 25 conservatively treated patients, 20 experienced good outcomes, 4 experienced moderate outcomes, and 1 died as a result of pulmonary embolism. Of the 17 surgically treated patients, 10 experienced good functional recoveries (7 treated with external ventricular drainage only and 3 treated with drainage followed by suboccipital craniectomy) and 3 survived with mild neurological deficits (one patient underwent ventriculostomy, one suboccipital craniectomy plus external ventricular drainage, and one suboccipital craniectomy only). The overall mortality rate was 13.6% (6 of 44 patients). CONCLUSION: For patients with worsening levels of consciousness and radio-logically evident ventricular enlargement, we recommend external ventricular drainage. We reserve surgical resection of necrotic tissue for patients whose clinical status worsens despite ventriculostomy, those for whom worsening is accompanied by signs of brainstem compression, and those with tight posterior fossae.

KW - Brainstem compression

KW - Cerebellar infarction

KW - Treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0242582320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0242582320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 1061

EP - 1066

JO - Neurosurgery

JF - Neurosurgery

SN - 0148-396X

IS - 5

ER -