Management of thymic tumors: A survey of current practice among members of the european society of thoracic surgeons

Enrico Ruffini, Dirk Van Raemdonck, Frank Detterbeck, Gaetano Rocco, Pascal Thomas, Federico Venuta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Management of thymoma has largely been based on single-institution retrospective, observational studies. The European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) Thymic Working Group has investigated the current practice among ESTS members. Methods: A questionnaire divided into seven sections with 24 questions was designed, and it was delivered to ESTS members. Results: Forty-four centers replied to the questionnaire. The results indicate that there is a general agreement concerning (1) the value of computed tomography scan for preoperative assessment; (2) the uselessness of a routine histologic confirmation before surgery; (3) the role of the World Health Organization classification; (4) the importance of complete and extended resection; (5) the role of surgery for recurrent disease; and (6) the need of a multidisciplinary team, including thoracic surgeons, pathologists, medical, and radiation oncologists. On the other hand, there is still a considerable debate about (1) the role of positron emission tomography scan for preoperative assessment; (2) a consistent and reliable staging system; (3) the usefulness of postoperative treatments for stages II and III diseases; (4) the management of type C thymoma; and (5) the role of extrapleural pneumonectomy for stage IVA thymoma. Conclusions: The survey provides a large, multiinstitutional overview of the clinical practice in the management of thymic tumors by ESTS members. Responses show some areas of agreement along with several areas of controversy. It is conceivable that a consequent step forward will be the creation of a collaborative effort within the ESTS and with other organizations for the creation of standard recommendations and guidelines for the management of thymic malignancies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)614-623
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Thoracic Oncology
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

Thymus Neoplasms
Thorax
Thymoma
Pneumonectomy
Practice Management
Positron-Emission Tomography
Observational Studies
Retrospective Studies
Tomography
Surgeons
Surveys and Questionnaires
Organizations
Guidelines
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Surgery
  • Survey
  • Thymic carcinoma
  • Thymoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Management of thymic tumors : A survey of current practice among members of the european society of thoracic surgeons. / Ruffini, Enrico; Van Raemdonck, Dirk; Detterbeck, Frank; Rocco, Gaetano; Thomas, Pascal; Venuta, Federico.

In: Journal of Thoracic Oncology, Vol. 6, No. 3, 03.2011, p. 614-623.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ruffini, Enrico ; Van Raemdonck, Dirk ; Detterbeck, Frank ; Rocco, Gaetano ; Thomas, Pascal ; Venuta, Federico. / Management of thymic tumors : A survey of current practice among members of the european society of thoracic surgeons. In: Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 2011 ; Vol. 6, No. 3. pp. 614-623.
@article{3761ac63c23e41ac9bb37e8f1b5d2fb4,
title = "Management of thymic tumors: A survey of current practice among members of the european society of thoracic surgeons",
abstract = "Introduction: Management of thymoma has largely been based on single-institution retrospective, observational studies. The European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) Thymic Working Group has investigated the current practice among ESTS members. Methods: A questionnaire divided into seven sections with 24 questions was designed, and it was delivered to ESTS members. Results: Forty-four centers replied to the questionnaire. The results indicate that there is a general agreement concerning (1) the value of computed tomography scan for preoperative assessment; (2) the uselessness of a routine histologic confirmation before surgery; (3) the role of the World Health Organization classification; (4) the importance of complete and extended resection; (5) the role of surgery for recurrent disease; and (6) the need of a multidisciplinary team, including thoracic surgeons, pathologists, medical, and radiation oncologists. On the other hand, there is still a considerable debate about (1) the role of positron emission tomography scan for preoperative assessment; (2) a consistent and reliable staging system; (3) the usefulness of postoperative treatments for stages II and III diseases; (4) the management of type C thymoma; and (5) the role of extrapleural pneumonectomy for stage IVA thymoma. Conclusions: The survey provides a large, multiinstitutional overview of the clinical practice in the management of thymic tumors by ESTS members. Responses show some areas of agreement along with several areas of controversy. It is conceivable that a consequent step forward will be the creation of a collaborative effort within the ESTS and with other organizations for the creation of standard recommendations and guidelines for the management of thymic malignancies.",
keywords = "Surgery, Survey, Thymic carcinoma, Thymoma",
author = "Enrico Ruffini and {Van Raemdonck}, Dirk and Frank Detterbeck and Gaetano Rocco and Pascal Thomas and Federico Venuta",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1097/JTO.0b013e318207cd74",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "614--623",
journal = "Journal of Thoracic Oncology",
issn = "1556-0864",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management of thymic tumors

T2 - A survey of current practice among members of the european society of thoracic surgeons

AU - Ruffini, Enrico

AU - Van Raemdonck, Dirk

AU - Detterbeck, Frank

AU - Rocco, Gaetano

AU - Thomas, Pascal

AU - Venuta, Federico

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - Introduction: Management of thymoma has largely been based on single-institution retrospective, observational studies. The European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) Thymic Working Group has investigated the current practice among ESTS members. Methods: A questionnaire divided into seven sections with 24 questions was designed, and it was delivered to ESTS members. Results: Forty-four centers replied to the questionnaire. The results indicate that there is a general agreement concerning (1) the value of computed tomography scan for preoperative assessment; (2) the uselessness of a routine histologic confirmation before surgery; (3) the role of the World Health Organization classification; (4) the importance of complete and extended resection; (5) the role of surgery for recurrent disease; and (6) the need of a multidisciplinary team, including thoracic surgeons, pathologists, medical, and radiation oncologists. On the other hand, there is still a considerable debate about (1) the role of positron emission tomography scan for preoperative assessment; (2) a consistent and reliable staging system; (3) the usefulness of postoperative treatments for stages II and III diseases; (4) the management of type C thymoma; and (5) the role of extrapleural pneumonectomy for stage IVA thymoma. Conclusions: The survey provides a large, multiinstitutional overview of the clinical practice in the management of thymic tumors by ESTS members. Responses show some areas of agreement along with several areas of controversy. It is conceivable that a consequent step forward will be the creation of a collaborative effort within the ESTS and with other organizations for the creation of standard recommendations and guidelines for the management of thymic malignancies.

AB - Introduction: Management of thymoma has largely been based on single-institution retrospective, observational studies. The European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) Thymic Working Group has investigated the current practice among ESTS members. Methods: A questionnaire divided into seven sections with 24 questions was designed, and it was delivered to ESTS members. Results: Forty-four centers replied to the questionnaire. The results indicate that there is a general agreement concerning (1) the value of computed tomography scan for preoperative assessment; (2) the uselessness of a routine histologic confirmation before surgery; (3) the role of the World Health Organization classification; (4) the importance of complete and extended resection; (5) the role of surgery for recurrent disease; and (6) the need of a multidisciplinary team, including thoracic surgeons, pathologists, medical, and radiation oncologists. On the other hand, there is still a considerable debate about (1) the role of positron emission tomography scan for preoperative assessment; (2) a consistent and reliable staging system; (3) the usefulness of postoperative treatments for stages II and III diseases; (4) the management of type C thymoma; and (5) the role of extrapleural pneumonectomy for stage IVA thymoma. Conclusions: The survey provides a large, multiinstitutional overview of the clinical practice in the management of thymic tumors by ESTS members. Responses show some areas of agreement along with several areas of controversy. It is conceivable that a consequent step forward will be the creation of a collaborative effort within the ESTS and with other organizations for the creation of standard recommendations and guidelines for the management of thymic malignancies.

KW - Surgery

KW - Survey

KW - Thymic carcinoma

KW - Thymoma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951769952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79951769952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318207cd74

DO - 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318207cd74

M3 - Article

C2 - 21266921

AN - SCOPUS:79951769952

VL - 6

SP - 614

EP - 623

JO - Journal of Thoracic Oncology

JF - Journal of Thoracic Oncology

SN - 1556-0864

IS - 3

ER -