Mapping avian distributions

The evolution of bird atlases

David W. Gibbons, Paul F. Donald, Hans Günther Bauer, Lorenzo Fornasari, Ian K. Dawson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Capsule: An increasing proportion of atlases now map patterns of abundance but they are still a minority even though they require no more input of time or fieldworkers. Aims: To examine quantitatively the evolution of bird atlas methods, from their inception to the present day, to document the most frequently used methods and to quantify temporal changes in them, and so identify broad patterns that might be of use in the planning and interpretation of future atlases. Methods: A database of over 400 atlases was compiled, and a number of variables extracted from each. Temporal trends within, and relationships between, these variables were analysed. Results: Atlases have become significantly reduced in scale over time, covering smaller areas in shorter periods of fieldwork, but at higher spatial resolutions and with increasing numbers of observers per unit area. The number of participating fieldworkers and the size of the region being covered together explain over 70% of variation between atlases in spatial resolution. The number of atlases that have mapped abundance or relative abundance, rather than simply occurrence (presence/absence) or breeding status, has increased significantly over time but remains relatively small. However, such atlases were no more expensive in terms of length of the fieldwork or preparation periods or the number of observers deployed per unit area. There is evidence of a sharp decline in the number of new bird atlases being initiated. Conclusions: There have been significant changes in the way atlas surveys are undertaken, but no standardized method has evolved. This leads to flexibility that allows atlas surveys to be undertaken over areas varying by six orders of magnitude using numbers of observers that vary by five orders of magnitude.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)324-334
Number of pages11
JournalBird Study
Volume54
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2007

Fingerprint

atlas
bird
birds
methodology
planning
fieldwork
spatial resolution
distribution
breeding
relative abundance
method

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

Gibbons, D. W., Donald, P. F., Bauer, H. G., Fornasari, L., & Dawson, I. K. (2007). Mapping avian distributions: The evolution of bird atlases. Bird Study, 54(3), 324-334.

Mapping avian distributions : The evolution of bird atlases. / Gibbons, David W.; Donald, Paul F.; Bauer, Hans Günther; Fornasari, Lorenzo; Dawson, Ian K.

In: Bird Study, Vol. 54, No. 3, 11.2007, p. 324-334.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gibbons, DW, Donald, PF, Bauer, HG, Fornasari, L & Dawson, IK 2007, 'Mapping avian distributions: The evolution of bird atlases', Bird Study, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 324-334.
Gibbons DW, Donald PF, Bauer HG, Fornasari L, Dawson IK. Mapping avian distributions: The evolution of bird atlases. Bird Study. 2007 Nov;54(3):324-334.
Gibbons, David W. ; Donald, Paul F. ; Bauer, Hans Günther ; Fornasari, Lorenzo ; Dawson, Ian K. / Mapping avian distributions : The evolution of bird atlases. In: Bird Study. 2007 ; Vol. 54, No. 3. pp. 324-334.
@article{b77e25a3b7c944db8e72506419483deb,
title = "Mapping avian distributions: The evolution of bird atlases",
abstract = "Capsule: An increasing proportion of atlases now map patterns of abundance but they are still a minority even though they require no more input of time or fieldworkers. Aims: To examine quantitatively the evolution of bird atlas methods, from their inception to the present day, to document the most frequently used methods and to quantify temporal changes in them, and so identify broad patterns that might be of use in the planning and interpretation of future atlases. Methods: A database of over 400 atlases was compiled, and a number of variables extracted from each. Temporal trends within, and relationships between, these variables were analysed. Results: Atlases have become significantly reduced in scale over time, covering smaller areas in shorter periods of fieldwork, but at higher spatial resolutions and with increasing numbers of observers per unit area. The number of participating fieldworkers and the size of the region being covered together explain over 70{\%} of variation between atlases in spatial resolution. The number of atlases that have mapped abundance or relative abundance, rather than simply occurrence (presence/absence) or breeding status, has increased significantly over time but remains relatively small. However, such atlases were no more expensive in terms of length of the fieldwork or preparation periods or the number of observers deployed per unit area. There is evidence of a sharp decline in the number of new bird atlases being initiated. Conclusions: There have been significant changes in the way atlas surveys are undertaken, but no standardized method has evolved. This leads to flexibility that allows atlas surveys to be undertaken over areas varying by six orders of magnitude using numbers of observers that vary by five orders of magnitude.",
author = "Gibbons, {David W.} and Donald, {Paul F.} and Bauer, {Hans G{\"u}nther} and Lorenzo Fornasari and Dawson, {Ian K.}",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "324--334",
journal = "Bird Study",
issn = "0006-3657",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mapping avian distributions

T2 - The evolution of bird atlases

AU - Gibbons, David W.

AU - Donald, Paul F.

AU - Bauer, Hans Günther

AU - Fornasari, Lorenzo

AU - Dawson, Ian K.

PY - 2007/11

Y1 - 2007/11

N2 - Capsule: An increasing proportion of atlases now map patterns of abundance but they are still a minority even though they require no more input of time or fieldworkers. Aims: To examine quantitatively the evolution of bird atlas methods, from their inception to the present day, to document the most frequently used methods and to quantify temporal changes in them, and so identify broad patterns that might be of use in the planning and interpretation of future atlases. Methods: A database of over 400 atlases was compiled, and a number of variables extracted from each. Temporal trends within, and relationships between, these variables were analysed. Results: Atlases have become significantly reduced in scale over time, covering smaller areas in shorter periods of fieldwork, but at higher spatial resolutions and with increasing numbers of observers per unit area. The number of participating fieldworkers and the size of the region being covered together explain over 70% of variation between atlases in spatial resolution. The number of atlases that have mapped abundance or relative abundance, rather than simply occurrence (presence/absence) or breeding status, has increased significantly over time but remains relatively small. However, such atlases were no more expensive in terms of length of the fieldwork or preparation periods or the number of observers deployed per unit area. There is evidence of a sharp decline in the number of new bird atlases being initiated. Conclusions: There have been significant changes in the way atlas surveys are undertaken, but no standardized method has evolved. This leads to flexibility that allows atlas surveys to be undertaken over areas varying by six orders of magnitude using numbers of observers that vary by five orders of magnitude.

AB - Capsule: An increasing proportion of atlases now map patterns of abundance but they are still a minority even though they require no more input of time or fieldworkers. Aims: To examine quantitatively the evolution of bird atlas methods, from their inception to the present day, to document the most frequently used methods and to quantify temporal changes in them, and so identify broad patterns that might be of use in the planning and interpretation of future atlases. Methods: A database of over 400 atlases was compiled, and a number of variables extracted from each. Temporal trends within, and relationships between, these variables were analysed. Results: Atlases have become significantly reduced in scale over time, covering smaller areas in shorter periods of fieldwork, but at higher spatial resolutions and with increasing numbers of observers per unit area. The number of participating fieldworkers and the size of the region being covered together explain over 70% of variation between atlases in spatial resolution. The number of atlases that have mapped abundance or relative abundance, rather than simply occurrence (presence/absence) or breeding status, has increased significantly over time but remains relatively small. However, such atlases were no more expensive in terms of length of the fieldwork or preparation periods or the number of observers deployed per unit area. There is evidence of a sharp decline in the number of new bird atlases being initiated. Conclusions: There have been significant changes in the way atlas surveys are undertaken, but no standardized method has evolved. This leads to flexibility that allows atlas surveys to be undertaken over areas varying by six orders of magnitude using numbers of observers that vary by five orders of magnitude.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36048942771&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36048942771&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 324

EP - 334

JO - Bird Study

JF - Bird Study

SN - 0006-3657

IS - 3

ER -