Measurement Invariance of the Day Reconstruction Method: Results from the COURAGE in Europe Project

Blanca Mellor-Marsá, Marta Miret, Francisco J. Abad, Somnath Chatterji, Beatriz Olaya, Beata Tobiasz-Adamczyk, Seppo Koskinen, Matilde Leonardi, Josep Maria Haro, José Luis Ayuso-Mateos, Francisco Félix Caballero

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Given the growing interest in the study of subjective well-being as a measure of social progress, instruments that produce valid and reliable scores and that can be used within and across countries are needed. The aim of the present study was to analyze the measurement equivalence of the Day Reconstruction Method in its brief version, using nationally representative samples from Finland, Poland, and Spain obtained within the COURAGE in Europe project. The goodness-of-fit of a two-correlated-factors model and the reliability of the scores obtained were assessed. Cross-country invariance was tested employing a multiple group confirmatory factor analysis, through sequential constraint imposition. In each country, measurement invariance was tested across time frames (morning, afternoon and evening) and days of the week (weekday and weekend). The results found support for the hypothesis of a two-correlated-factors (positive and negative affect) structure; the reliability of the positive, the negative and the net affect scores showed appropriate values. A high equivalence across the three national samples was found: all items except one showed strong measurement invariance indicating that respondents from Finland, Poland, and Spain attribute the same meaning to the latent construct under study, and the levels of the underlying items are equal in all three countries. Similar results were found for the measurement equivalence across time frames and days of the week. Our findings support the assumption of comparability across the different samples considered; in general, higher positive affect and lower negative affect were found in Finland, in the evening and at the weekend.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Happiness Studies
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Aug 18 2015

Fingerprint

reconstruction
equivalence
Finland
weekend
Poland
Spain
factor analysis
well-being
Values
Group
time

Keywords

  • Day Reconstruction Method
  • Measurement invariance
  • Multiple group confirmatory factor analysis
  • Subjective well-being

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Mellor-Marsá, B., Miret, M., Abad, F. J., Chatterji, S., Olaya, B., Tobiasz-Adamczyk, B., ... Caballero, F. F. (Accepted/In press). Measurement Invariance of the Day Reconstruction Method: Results from the COURAGE in Europe Project. Journal of Happiness Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9669-x

Measurement Invariance of the Day Reconstruction Method : Results from the COURAGE in Europe Project. / Mellor-Marsá, Blanca; Miret, Marta; Abad, Francisco J.; Chatterji, Somnath; Olaya, Beatriz; Tobiasz-Adamczyk, Beata; Koskinen, Seppo; Leonardi, Matilde; Haro, Josep Maria; Ayuso-Mateos, José Luis; Caballero, Francisco Félix.

In: Journal of Happiness Studies, 18.08.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mellor-Marsá, B, Miret, M, Abad, FJ, Chatterji, S, Olaya, B, Tobiasz-Adamczyk, B, Koskinen, S, Leonardi, M, Haro, JM, Ayuso-Mateos, JL & Caballero, FF 2015, 'Measurement Invariance of the Day Reconstruction Method: Results from the COURAGE in Europe Project', Journal of Happiness Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9669-x
Mellor-Marsá, Blanca ; Miret, Marta ; Abad, Francisco J. ; Chatterji, Somnath ; Olaya, Beatriz ; Tobiasz-Adamczyk, Beata ; Koskinen, Seppo ; Leonardi, Matilde ; Haro, Josep Maria ; Ayuso-Mateos, José Luis ; Caballero, Francisco Félix. / Measurement Invariance of the Day Reconstruction Method : Results from the COURAGE in Europe Project. In: Journal of Happiness Studies. 2015.
@article{c3e24bda401a45cabd18e67ff0659f21,
title = "Measurement Invariance of the Day Reconstruction Method: Results from the COURAGE in Europe Project",
abstract = "Given the growing interest in the study of subjective well-being as a measure of social progress, instruments that produce valid and reliable scores and that can be used within and across countries are needed. The aim of the present study was to analyze the measurement equivalence of the Day Reconstruction Method in its brief version, using nationally representative samples from Finland, Poland, and Spain obtained within the COURAGE in Europe project. The goodness-of-fit of a two-correlated-factors model and the reliability of the scores obtained were assessed. Cross-country invariance was tested employing a multiple group confirmatory factor analysis, through sequential constraint imposition. In each country, measurement invariance was tested across time frames (morning, afternoon and evening) and days of the week (weekday and weekend). The results found support for the hypothesis of a two-correlated-factors (positive and negative affect) structure; the reliability of the positive, the negative and the net affect scores showed appropriate values. A high equivalence across the three national samples was found: all items except one showed strong measurement invariance indicating that respondents from Finland, Poland, and Spain attribute the same meaning to the latent construct under study, and the levels of the underlying items are equal in all three countries. Similar results were found for the measurement equivalence across time frames and days of the week. Our findings support the assumption of comparability across the different samples considered; in general, higher positive affect and lower negative affect were found in Finland, in the evening and at the weekend.",
keywords = "Day Reconstruction Method, Measurement invariance, Multiple group confirmatory factor analysis, Subjective well-being",
author = "Blanca Mellor-Mars{\'a} and Marta Miret and Abad, {Francisco J.} and Somnath Chatterji and Beatriz Olaya and Beata Tobiasz-Adamczyk and Seppo Koskinen and Matilde Leonardi and Haro, {Josep Maria} and Ayuso-Mateos, {Jos{\'e} Luis} and Caballero, {Francisco F{\'e}lix}",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1007/s10902-015-9669-x",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Happiness Studies",
issn = "1389-4978",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurement Invariance of the Day Reconstruction Method

T2 - Results from the COURAGE in Europe Project

AU - Mellor-Marsá, Blanca

AU - Miret, Marta

AU - Abad, Francisco J.

AU - Chatterji, Somnath

AU - Olaya, Beatriz

AU - Tobiasz-Adamczyk, Beata

AU - Koskinen, Seppo

AU - Leonardi, Matilde

AU - Haro, Josep Maria

AU - Ayuso-Mateos, José Luis

AU - Caballero, Francisco Félix

PY - 2015/8/18

Y1 - 2015/8/18

N2 - Given the growing interest in the study of subjective well-being as a measure of social progress, instruments that produce valid and reliable scores and that can be used within and across countries are needed. The aim of the present study was to analyze the measurement equivalence of the Day Reconstruction Method in its brief version, using nationally representative samples from Finland, Poland, and Spain obtained within the COURAGE in Europe project. The goodness-of-fit of a two-correlated-factors model and the reliability of the scores obtained were assessed. Cross-country invariance was tested employing a multiple group confirmatory factor analysis, through sequential constraint imposition. In each country, measurement invariance was tested across time frames (morning, afternoon and evening) and days of the week (weekday and weekend). The results found support for the hypothesis of a two-correlated-factors (positive and negative affect) structure; the reliability of the positive, the negative and the net affect scores showed appropriate values. A high equivalence across the three national samples was found: all items except one showed strong measurement invariance indicating that respondents from Finland, Poland, and Spain attribute the same meaning to the latent construct under study, and the levels of the underlying items are equal in all three countries. Similar results were found for the measurement equivalence across time frames and days of the week. Our findings support the assumption of comparability across the different samples considered; in general, higher positive affect and lower negative affect were found in Finland, in the evening and at the weekend.

AB - Given the growing interest in the study of subjective well-being as a measure of social progress, instruments that produce valid and reliable scores and that can be used within and across countries are needed. The aim of the present study was to analyze the measurement equivalence of the Day Reconstruction Method in its brief version, using nationally representative samples from Finland, Poland, and Spain obtained within the COURAGE in Europe project. The goodness-of-fit of a two-correlated-factors model and the reliability of the scores obtained were assessed. Cross-country invariance was tested employing a multiple group confirmatory factor analysis, through sequential constraint imposition. In each country, measurement invariance was tested across time frames (morning, afternoon and evening) and days of the week (weekday and weekend). The results found support for the hypothesis of a two-correlated-factors (positive and negative affect) structure; the reliability of the positive, the negative and the net affect scores showed appropriate values. A high equivalence across the three national samples was found: all items except one showed strong measurement invariance indicating that respondents from Finland, Poland, and Spain attribute the same meaning to the latent construct under study, and the levels of the underlying items are equal in all three countries. Similar results were found for the measurement equivalence across time frames and days of the week. Our findings support the assumption of comparability across the different samples considered; in general, higher positive affect and lower negative affect were found in Finland, in the evening and at the weekend.

KW - Day Reconstruction Method

KW - Measurement invariance

KW - Multiple group confirmatory factor analysis

KW - Subjective well-being

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939419968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939419968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10902-015-9669-x

DO - 10.1007/s10902-015-9669-x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84939419968

JO - Journal of Happiness Studies

JF - Journal of Happiness Studies

SN - 1389-4978

ER -