Measuring clinical change in routine mental health care: Differences between first time and longer term service users

Alberto Parabiaghi, Filippo Rapisarda, Barbara D'Avanzo, Arcadio Erlicher, Antonio Lora, Angelo Barbato

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The aims were to assess the feasibility of routinely collecting outcome data in everyday mental health services across Italy and to evaluate clinical change in a cohort of patients stratified by illness duration. Method: A prevalence sample of patients attending nine Italian community mental health services (CMHS) was assessed over one year with the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). The patients were classified on the basis of the duration of their contact with services. Clinical outcome was evaluated taking into account parameters of reliable and clinically significant change (RCSC). Predictors of change included clinical and socio-demographic characteristics at first assessment and six month reliable improvement. Results: 2059 patients were evaluated with only 3% attrition at follow up; 22% of first time and about 7% of longer term users achieved reliable improvement at one year. First contacts had a better outcome than longer term users and significant differences were seen at both group and individual level. Reliable improvement at six months was the best predictor of clinical improvement at one year for the whole cohort. Conclusion: The study demonstrated the feasibility of routine outcome assessment and gave an expected and realistic picture of the one-year outcome of a representative sample of patients attending a group of Italian CMHS. RCSC showed potential utility as a means of communicating with clinicians and decision makers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)558-568
Number of pages11
JournalAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Volume45
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2011

Fingerprint

Mental Health
Community Mental Health Services
Delivery of Health Care
Patient Advocacy
Mental Health Services
Feasibility Studies
Italy
Demography
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Health

Keywords

  • Community mental health
  • First time users
  • Longer term users
  • Reliable change
  • Routine outcome assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Measuring clinical change in routine mental health care : Differences between first time and longer term service users. / Parabiaghi, Alberto; Rapisarda, Filippo; D'Avanzo, Barbara; Erlicher, Arcadio; Lora, Antonio; Barbato, Angelo.

In: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 45, No. 7, 07.2011, p. 558-568.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Parabiaghi, Alberto ; Rapisarda, Filippo ; D'Avanzo, Barbara ; Erlicher, Arcadio ; Lora, Antonio ; Barbato, Angelo. / Measuring clinical change in routine mental health care : Differences between first time and longer term service users. In: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2011 ; Vol. 45, No. 7. pp. 558-568.
@article{499d520fa59747768b5ac6da78770a61,
title = "Measuring clinical change in routine mental health care: Differences between first time and longer term service users",
abstract = "Objective: The aims were to assess the feasibility of routinely collecting outcome data in everyday mental health services across Italy and to evaluate clinical change in a cohort of patients stratified by illness duration. Method: A prevalence sample of patients attending nine Italian community mental health services (CMHS) was assessed over one year with the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). The patients were classified on the basis of the duration of their contact with services. Clinical outcome was evaluated taking into account parameters of reliable and clinically significant change (RCSC). Predictors of change included clinical and socio-demographic characteristics at first assessment and six month reliable improvement. Results: 2059 patients were evaluated with only 3{\%} attrition at follow up; 22{\%} of first time and about 7{\%} of longer term users achieved reliable improvement at one year. First contacts had a better outcome than longer term users and significant differences were seen at both group and individual level. Reliable improvement at six months was the best predictor of clinical improvement at one year for the whole cohort. Conclusion: The study demonstrated the feasibility of routine outcome assessment and gave an expected and realistic picture of the one-year outcome of a representative sample of patients attending a group of Italian CMHS. RCSC showed potential utility as a means of communicating with clinicians and decision makers.",
keywords = "Community mental health, First time users, Longer term users, Reliable change, Routine outcome assessment",
author = "Alberto Parabiaghi and Filippo Rapisarda and Barbara D'Avanzo and Arcadio Erlicher and Antonio Lora and Angelo Barbato",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10.3109/00048674.2011.580450",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "558--568",
journal = "Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry",
issn = "0004-8674",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring clinical change in routine mental health care

T2 - Differences between first time and longer term service users

AU - Parabiaghi, Alberto

AU - Rapisarda, Filippo

AU - D'Avanzo, Barbara

AU - Erlicher, Arcadio

AU - Lora, Antonio

AU - Barbato, Angelo

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - Objective: The aims were to assess the feasibility of routinely collecting outcome data in everyday mental health services across Italy and to evaluate clinical change in a cohort of patients stratified by illness duration. Method: A prevalence sample of patients attending nine Italian community mental health services (CMHS) was assessed over one year with the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). The patients were classified on the basis of the duration of their contact with services. Clinical outcome was evaluated taking into account parameters of reliable and clinically significant change (RCSC). Predictors of change included clinical and socio-demographic characteristics at first assessment and six month reliable improvement. Results: 2059 patients were evaluated with only 3% attrition at follow up; 22% of first time and about 7% of longer term users achieved reliable improvement at one year. First contacts had a better outcome than longer term users and significant differences were seen at both group and individual level. Reliable improvement at six months was the best predictor of clinical improvement at one year for the whole cohort. Conclusion: The study demonstrated the feasibility of routine outcome assessment and gave an expected and realistic picture of the one-year outcome of a representative sample of patients attending a group of Italian CMHS. RCSC showed potential utility as a means of communicating with clinicians and decision makers.

AB - Objective: The aims were to assess the feasibility of routinely collecting outcome data in everyday mental health services across Italy and to evaluate clinical change in a cohort of patients stratified by illness duration. Method: A prevalence sample of patients attending nine Italian community mental health services (CMHS) was assessed over one year with the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). The patients were classified on the basis of the duration of their contact with services. Clinical outcome was evaluated taking into account parameters of reliable and clinically significant change (RCSC). Predictors of change included clinical and socio-demographic characteristics at first assessment and six month reliable improvement. Results: 2059 patients were evaluated with only 3% attrition at follow up; 22% of first time and about 7% of longer term users achieved reliable improvement at one year. First contacts had a better outcome than longer term users and significant differences were seen at both group and individual level. Reliable improvement at six months was the best predictor of clinical improvement at one year for the whole cohort. Conclusion: The study demonstrated the feasibility of routine outcome assessment and gave an expected and realistic picture of the one-year outcome of a representative sample of patients attending a group of Italian CMHS. RCSC showed potential utility as a means of communicating with clinicians and decision makers.

KW - Community mental health

KW - First time users

KW - Longer term users

KW - Reliable change

KW - Routine outcome assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959903051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959903051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/00048674.2011.580450

DO - 10.3109/00048674.2011.580450

M3 - Article

C2 - 21561240

AN - SCOPUS:79959903051

VL - 45

SP - 558

EP - 568

JO - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

JF - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

SN - 0004-8674

IS - 7

ER -