Measuring standing balance in adults

Reliability and minimal real difference of 14 instrumental measures

Luigi Tesio, Viviana Rota, Stefano Longo, Mariusz T. Grzeda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The study provides estimates of reliability and minimal real difference (MRD) (i.e. the minimal change significantly different from zero, expressed in the original units) of 14 parameters obtained from six motor tasks of standing balance on the EquiTest (dynamic) and the Balance Master (static) force platforms. The different tasks and parameters allowed an assessment of balance in three domains: quiet standing, perturbed standing and multidirectional leaning. Fifteen healthy adults (eight men and seven women; age 22-42 years) were studied at baseline and retested 1 and 3 weeks later. The significance level was set at P-value less than 0.05 and adjusted for multiplicity within sets of tests reflecting the same balance domain (Bonferroni corrections). Repeated analysis of variance modelling revealed a moderate yet significant time trend across the three time points, suggesting a practice effect for the mean of one out of the 14 parameters. Changes across pairs of time points did not reach significance (Tukey's post-hoc test). Test-retest reliability across the three time points and across pairs of time points was estimated for each parameter using the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) (model 3.1; range 0-1, none to perfect reliability). Across the three time points, the ICCs ranged from 0.21 to 0.85 (>0.60 in nine out of the 14 cases). The MRDs were computed from the ICCs. For all 14 parameters showing a time trend, absolute changes (root mean squares of differences) were minimal. Thus, albeit overestimated for one parameter, the MRDs provide useful thresholds for changes to be interpreted as dependent on therapeutic interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)362-374
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Rehabilitation Research
Volume36
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Analysis of Variance
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Balance
  • Balance Master
  • EquiTest
  • Intraclass correlation coefficients
  • Minimal real difference
  • Reliability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Measuring standing balance in adults : Reliability and minimal real difference of 14 instrumental measures. / Tesio, Luigi; Rota, Viviana; Longo, Stefano; Grzeda, Mariusz T.

In: International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, Vol. 36, No. 4, 12.2013, p. 362-374.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0a20af7a65464f2887f405777b54435c,
title = "Measuring standing balance in adults: Reliability and minimal real difference of 14 instrumental measures",
abstract = "The study provides estimates of reliability and minimal real difference (MRD) (i.e. the minimal change significantly different from zero, expressed in the original units) of 14 parameters obtained from six motor tasks of standing balance on the EquiTest (dynamic) and the Balance Master (static) force platforms. The different tasks and parameters allowed an assessment of balance in three domains: quiet standing, perturbed standing and multidirectional leaning. Fifteen healthy adults (eight men and seven women; age 22-42 years) were studied at baseline and retested 1 and 3 weeks later. The significance level was set at P-value less than 0.05 and adjusted for multiplicity within sets of tests reflecting the same balance domain (Bonferroni corrections). Repeated analysis of variance modelling revealed a moderate yet significant time trend across the three time points, suggesting a practice effect for the mean of one out of the 14 parameters. Changes across pairs of time points did not reach significance (Tukey's post-hoc test). Test-retest reliability across the three time points and across pairs of time points was estimated for each parameter using the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) (model 3.1; range 0-1, none to perfect reliability). Across the three time points, the ICCs ranged from 0.21 to 0.85 (>0.60 in nine out of the 14 cases). The MRDs were computed from the ICCs. For all 14 parameters showing a time trend, absolute changes (root mean squares of differences) were minimal. Thus, albeit overestimated for one parameter, the MRDs provide useful thresholds for changes to be interpreted as dependent on therapeutic interventions.",
keywords = "Balance, Balance Master, EquiTest, Intraclass correlation coefficients, Minimal real difference, Reliability",
author = "Luigi Tesio and Viviana Rota and Stefano Longo and Grzeda, {Mariusz T.}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1097/MRR.0000000000000037",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "362--374",
journal = "International Journal of Rehabilitation Research",
issn = "0342-5282",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring standing balance in adults

T2 - Reliability and minimal real difference of 14 instrumental measures

AU - Tesio, Luigi

AU - Rota, Viviana

AU - Longo, Stefano

AU - Grzeda, Mariusz T.

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - The study provides estimates of reliability and minimal real difference (MRD) (i.e. the minimal change significantly different from zero, expressed in the original units) of 14 parameters obtained from six motor tasks of standing balance on the EquiTest (dynamic) and the Balance Master (static) force platforms. The different tasks and parameters allowed an assessment of balance in three domains: quiet standing, perturbed standing and multidirectional leaning. Fifteen healthy adults (eight men and seven women; age 22-42 years) were studied at baseline and retested 1 and 3 weeks later. The significance level was set at P-value less than 0.05 and adjusted for multiplicity within sets of tests reflecting the same balance domain (Bonferroni corrections). Repeated analysis of variance modelling revealed a moderate yet significant time trend across the three time points, suggesting a practice effect for the mean of one out of the 14 parameters. Changes across pairs of time points did not reach significance (Tukey's post-hoc test). Test-retest reliability across the three time points and across pairs of time points was estimated for each parameter using the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) (model 3.1; range 0-1, none to perfect reliability). Across the three time points, the ICCs ranged from 0.21 to 0.85 (>0.60 in nine out of the 14 cases). The MRDs were computed from the ICCs. For all 14 parameters showing a time trend, absolute changes (root mean squares of differences) were minimal. Thus, albeit overestimated for one parameter, the MRDs provide useful thresholds for changes to be interpreted as dependent on therapeutic interventions.

AB - The study provides estimates of reliability and minimal real difference (MRD) (i.e. the minimal change significantly different from zero, expressed in the original units) of 14 parameters obtained from six motor tasks of standing balance on the EquiTest (dynamic) and the Balance Master (static) force platforms. The different tasks and parameters allowed an assessment of balance in three domains: quiet standing, perturbed standing and multidirectional leaning. Fifteen healthy adults (eight men and seven women; age 22-42 years) were studied at baseline and retested 1 and 3 weeks later. The significance level was set at P-value less than 0.05 and adjusted for multiplicity within sets of tests reflecting the same balance domain (Bonferroni corrections). Repeated analysis of variance modelling revealed a moderate yet significant time trend across the three time points, suggesting a practice effect for the mean of one out of the 14 parameters. Changes across pairs of time points did not reach significance (Tukey's post-hoc test). Test-retest reliability across the three time points and across pairs of time points was estimated for each parameter using the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) (model 3.1; range 0-1, none to perfect reliability). Across the three time points, the ICCs ranged from 0.21 to 0.85 (>0.60 in nine out of the 14 cases). The MRDs were computed from the ICCs. For all 14 parameters showing a time trend, absolute changes (root mean squares of differences) were minimal. Thus, albeit overestimated for one parameter, the MRDs provide useful thresholds for changes to be interpreted as dependent on therapeutic interventions.

KW - Balance

KW - Balance Master

KW - EquiTest

KW - Intraclass correlation coefficients

KW - Minimal real difference

KW - Reliability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887814546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887814546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000037

DO - 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000037

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 362

EP - 374

JO - International Journal of Rehabilitation Research

JF - International Journal of Rehabilitation Research

SN - 0342-5282

IS - 4

ER -