Melanoma Computer-Aided Diagnosis: Reliability and Feasibility Study

Marco Burroni, Rosamaria Corona, Giordana Dell'Eva, Francesco Sera, Riccardo Bono, Pietro Puddu, Roberto Perotti, Franco Nobile, Lucio Andreassi, Pietro Rubegni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

89 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Differential diagnosis of melanoma from melanocytic nevi is often not straightforward. Thus, a growing interest has developed in the last decade in the automated analysis of digitized images obtained by epiluminescence microscopy techniques to assist clinicians in differentiating early melanoma from benign skin lesions. Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic accuracy provided by different statistical classifiers on a large set of pigmented skin lesions grabbed by four digital analyzers located in two different dermatological units. Experimental Design: Images of 391melanomas and 449 melanocytic nevi were included in the study. A linear classifier was built by using the method of receiver operating characteristic curves to identify a threshold value for a fixed sensitivity of 95%. A K-nearest-neighbor classifier, a nonparametric method of pattern recognition, was constructed using all available image features and trained for a sensitivity of 98% on a large exemplar set of lesions. Results: On independent test sets of lesions, the linear classifier and the K-nearest-neighbor classifier produced a mean sensitivity of 95% and 98% and a mean specificity of 78% and of 79%, respectively. Conclusions: In conclusion, our study suggests that computer-aided differentiation of melanoma from benign pigmented lesions obtained with DB-Mips is feasible and, above all, reliable. In fact, the same instrumentations used in different units provided similar diagnostic accuracy. Whether this would improve early diagnosis of melanoma and/or reducing unnecessary surgery needs to be demonstrated by a randomized clinical trial.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1881-1886
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Cancer Research
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 15 2004

Fingerprint

Feasibility Studies
Melanoma
Pigmented Nevus
Dermoscopy
Unnecessary Procedures
Skin
ROC Curve
Early Diagnosis
Differential Diagnosis
Research Design
Randomized Controlled Trials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

Burroni, M., Corona, R., Dell'Eva, G., Sera, F., Bono, R., Puddu, P., ... Rubegni, P. (2004). Melanoma Computer-Aided Diagnosis: Reliability and Feasibility Study. Clinical Cancer Research, 10(6), 1881-1886. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0039

Melanoma Computer-Aided Diagnosis : Reliability and Feasibility Study. / Burroni, Marco; Corona, Rosamaria; Dell'Eva, Giordana; Sera, Francesco; Bono, Riccardo; Puddu, Pietro; Perotti, Roberto; Nobile, Franco; Andreassi, Lucio; Rubegni, Pietro.

In: Clinical Cancer Research, Vol. 10, No. 6, 15.03.2004, p. 1881-1886.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Burroni, M, Corona, R, Dell'Eva, G, Sera, F, Bono, R, Puddu, P, Perotti, R, Nobile, F, Andreassi, L & Rubegni, P 2004, 'Melanoma Computer-Aided Diagnosis: Reliability and Feasibility Study', Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1881-1886. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0039
Burroni M, Corona R, Dell'Eva G, Sera F, Bono R, Puddu P et al. Melanoma Computer-Aided Diagnosis: Reliability and Feasibility Study. Clinical Cancer Research. 2004 Mar 15;10(6):1881-1886. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0039
Burroni, Marco ; Corona, Rosamaria ; Dell'Eva, Giordana ; Sera, Francesco ; Bono, Riccardo ; Puddu, Pietro ; Perotti, Roberto ; Nobile, Franco ; Andreassi, Lucio ; Rubegni, Pietro. / Melanoma Computer-Aided Diagnosis : Reliability and Feasibility Study. In: Clinical Cancer Research. 2004 ; Vol. 10, No. 6. pp. 1881-1886.
@article{ed6c214acc78428ea78157ef34e72da3,
title = "Melanoma Computer-Aided Diagnosis: Reliability and Feasibility Study",
abstract = "Background: Differential diagnosis of melanoma from melanocytic nevi is often not straightforward. Thus, a growing interest has developed in the last decade in the automated analysis of digitized images obtained by epiluminescence microscopy techniques to assist clinicians in differentiating early melanoma from benign skin lesions. Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic accuracy provided by different statistical classifiers on a large set of pigmented skin lesions grabbed by four digital analyzers located in two different dermatological units. Experimental Design: Images of 391melanomas and 449 melanocytic nevi were included in the study. A linear classifier was built by using the method of receiver operating characteristic curves to identify a threshold value for a fixed sensitivity of 95{\%}. A K-nearest-neighbor classifier, a nonparametric method of pattern recognition, was constructed using all available image features and trained for a sensitivity of 98{\%} on a large exemplar set of lesions. Results: On independent test sets of lesions, the linear classifier and the K-nearest-neighbor classifier produced a mean sensitivity of 95{\%} and 98{\%} and a mean specificity of 78{\%} and of 79{\%}, respectively. Conclusions: In conclusion, our study suggests that computer-aided differentiation of melanoma from benign pigmented lesions obtained with DB-Mips is feasible and, above all, reliable. In fact, the same instrumentations used in different units provided similar diagnostic accuracy. Whether this would improve early diagnosis of melanoma and/or reducing unnecessary surgery needs to be demonstrated by a randomized clinical trial.",
author = "Marco Burroni and Rosamaria Corona and Giordana Dell'Eva and Francesco Sera and Riccardo Bono and Pietro Puddu and Roberto Perotti and Franco Nobile and Lucio Andreassi and Pietro Rubegni",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0039",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "1881--1886",
journal = "Clinical Cancer Research",
issn = "1078-0432",
publisher = "American Association for Cancer Research Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Melanoma Computer-Aided Diagnosis

T2 - Reliability and Feasibility Study

AU - Burroni, Marco

AU - Corona, Rosamaria

AU - Dell'Eva, Giordana

AU - Sera, Francesco

AU - Bono, Riccardo

AU - Puddu, Pietro

AU - Perotti, Roberto

AU - Nobile, Franco

AU - Andreassi, Lucio

AU - Rubegni, Pietro

PY - 2004/3/15

Y1 - 2004/3/15

N2 - Background: Differential diagnosis of melanoma from melanocytic nevi is often not straightforward. Thus, a growing interest has developed in the last decade in the automated analysis of digitized images obtained by epiluminescence microscopy techniques to assist clinicians in differentiating early melanoma from benign skin lesions. Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic accuracy provided by different statistical classifiers on a large set of pigmented skin lesions grabbed by four digital analyzers located in two different dermatological units. Experimental Design: Images of 391melanomas and 449 melanocytic nevi were included in the study. A linear classifier was built by using the method of receiver operating characteristic curves to identify a threshold value for a fixed sensitivity of 95%. A K-nearest-neighbor classifier, a nonparametric method of pattern recognition, was constructed using all available image features and trained for a sensitivity of 98% on a large exemplar set of lesions. Results: On independent test sets of lesions, the linear classifier and the K-nearest-neighbor classifier produced a mean sensitivity of 95% and 98% and a mean specificity of 78% and of 79%, respectively. Conclusions: In conclusion, our study suggests that computer-aided differentiation of melanoma from benign pigmented lesions obtained with DB-Mips is feasible and, above all, reliable. In fact, the same instrumentations used in different units provided similar diagnostic accuracy. Whether this would improve early diagnosis of melanoma and/or reducing unnecessary surgery needs to be demonstrated by a randomized clinical trial.

AB - Background: Differential diagnosis of melanoma from melanocytic nevi is often not straightforward. Thus, a growing interest has developed in the last decade in the automated analysis of digitized images obtained by epiluminescence microscopy techniques to assist clinicians in differentiating early melanoma from benign skin lesions. Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic accuracy provided by different statistical classifiers on a large set of pigmented skin lesions grabbed by four digital analyzers located in two different dermatological units. Experimental Design: Images of 391melanomas and 449 melanocytic nevi were included in the study. A linear classifier was built by using the method of receiver operating characteristic curves to identify a threshold value for a fixed sensitivity of 95%. A K-nearest-neighbor classifier, a nonparametric method of pattern recognition, was constructed using all available image features and trained for a sensitivity of 98% on a large exemplar set of lesions. Results: On independent test sets of lesions, the linear classifier and the K-nearest-neighbor classifier produced a mean sensitivity of 95% and 98% and a mean specificity of 78% and of 79%, respectively. Conclusions: In conclusion, our study suggests that computer-aided differentiation of melanoma from benign pigmented lesions obtained with DB-Mips is feasible and, above all, reliable. In fact, the same instrumentations used in different units provided similar diagnostic accuracy. Whether this would improve early diagnosis of melanoma and/or reducing unnecessary surgery needs to be demonstrated by a randomized clinical trial.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=12144286204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=12144286204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0039

DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0039

M3 - Article

C2 - 15041702

AN - SCOPUS:12144286204

VL - 10

SP - 1881

EP - 1886

JO - Clinical Cancer Research

JF - Clinical Cancer Research

SN - 1078-0432

IS - 6

ER -