Melanomas that failed dermoscopic detection: A combined clinicodermoscopic approach for not missing melanoma

Susana Puig, Giuseppe Argenziano, Iris Zalaudek, Gerardo Ferrara, Jose Palou, Daniela Massi, Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof, H. Peter Soyer, Josep Malvehy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to describe the clinical and dermoscopic characteristics of difficult-to-diagnose melanomas (DDM). DESIGN: This study was a retrospective analysis of clinical data and dermoscopic images in a series of excised melanomas. SETTING: Cases were obtained from the database registers of three public hospitals in Barcelona (Spain), Naples (Italy), and Graz (Austria). PATIENTS: A total of 97 tumors with a main preoperative diagnosis different from melanoma and without sufficient criteria to be diagnosed clinically and dermoscopically as melanoma were studied. We studied clinical data from the patients and lesions, mean reason for excision, and consensus dermoscopic description of the lesions according to pattern analysis performed by a panel of four dermoscopists to obtain clues that allow these melanomas to be recognized. RESULTS: Ninety-three DDMs were evaluated. Three main dermoscopic categories of DDM have been identified: (1) DDMs lacking specific features (16/97), (2) DDMs simulating nonmelanocytic lesions (14/93), and (3) DDMs simulating benign melanocytic proliferations (67/93). The reasons for excision were (1) the subjective history of change referred by the patient (38% of cases), (2) the presence of clinical and/or dermoscopic "hints" for biopsy (33% of cases), and (3) the objective evidence of changes detected by digital dermoscopic follow-up (29% of cases). CONCLUSIONS: A diagnostic algorithm is proposed not to miss melanoma.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1262-1273
Number of pages12
JournalDermatologic Surgery
Volume33
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2007

Fingerprint

Melanoma
Austria
Public Hospitals
Spain
Italy
History
Databases
Biopsy
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Puig, S., Argenziano, G., Zalaudek, I., Ferrara, G., Palou, J., Massi, D., ... Malvehy, J. (2007). Melanomas that failed dermoscopic detection: A combined clinicodermoscopic approach for not missing melanoma. Dermatologic Surgery, 33(10), 1262-1273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33264.x

Melanomas that failed dermoscopic detection : A combined clinicodermoscopic approach for not missing melanoma. / Puig, Susana; Argenziano, Giuseppe; Zalaudek, Iris; Ferrara, Gerardo; Palou, Jose; Massi, Daniela; Hofmann-Wellenhof, Rainer; Soyer, H. Peter; Malvehy, Josep.

In: Dermatologic Surgery, Vol. 33, No. 10, 10.2007, p. 1262-1273.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Puig, S, Argenziano, G, Zalaudek, I, Ferrara, G, Palou, J, Massi, D, Hofmann-Wellenhof, R, Soyer, HP & Malvehy, J 2007, 'Melanomas that failed dermoscopic detection: A combined clinicodermoscopic approach for not missing melanoma', Dermatologic Surgery, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1262-1273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33264.x
Puig, Susana ; Argenziano, Giuseppe ; Zalaudek, Iris ; Ferrara, Gerardo ; Palou, Jose ; Massi, Daniela ; Hofmann-Wellenhof, Rainer ; Soyer, H. Peter ; Malvehy, Josep. / Melanomas that failed dermoscopic detection : A combined clinicodermoscopic approach for not missing melanoma. In: Dermatologic Surgery. 2007 ; Vol. 33, No. 10. pp. 1262-1273.
@article{debbd14ac9804df9aaf3ed446c4bfc5f,
title = "Melanomas that failed dermoscopic detection: A combined clinicodermoscopic approach for not missing melanoma",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The objective was to describe the clinical and dermoscopic characteristics of difficult-to-diagnose melanomas (DDM). DESIGN: This study was a retrospective analysis of clinical data and dermoscopic images in a series of excised melanomas. SETTING: Cases were obtained from the database registers of three public hospitals in Barcelona (Spain), Naples (Italy), and Graz (Austria). PATIENTS: A total of 97 tumors with a main preoperative diagnosis different from melanoma and without sufficient criteria to be diagnosed clinically and dermoscopically as melanoma were studied. We studied clinical data from the patients and lesions, mean reason for excision, and consensus dermoscopic description of the lesions according to pattern analysis performed by a panel of four dermoscopists to obtain clues that allow these melanomas to be recognized. RESULTS: Ninety-three DDMs were evaluated. Three main dermoscopic categories of DDM have been identified: (1) DDMs lacking specific features (16/97), (2) DDMs simulating nonmelanocytic lesions (14/93), and (3) DDMs simulating benign melanocytic proliferations (67/93). The reasons for excision were (1) the subjective history of change referred by the patient (38{\%} of cases), (2) the presence of clinical and/or dermoscopic {"}hints{"} for biopsy (33{\%} of cases), and (3) the objective evidence of changes detected by digital dermoscopic follow-up (29{\%} of cases). CONCLUSIONS: A diagnostic algorithm is proposed not to miss melanoma.",
author = "Susana Puig and Giuseppe Argenziano and Iris Zalaudek and Gerardo Ferrara and Jose Palou and Daniela Massi and Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof and Soyer, {H. Peter} and Josep Malvehy",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33264.x",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "1262--1273",
journal = "Dermatologic Surgery",
issn = "1076-0512",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Melanomas that failed dermoscopic detection

T2 - A combined clinicodermoscopic approach for not missing melanoma

AU - Puig, Susana

AU - Argenziano, Giuseppe

AU - Zalaudek, Iris

AU - Ferrara, Gerardo

AU - Palou, Jose

AU - Massi, Daniela

AU - Hofmann-Wellenhof, Rainer

AU - Soyer, H. Peter

AU - Malvehy, Josep

PY - 2007/10

Y1 - 2007/10

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The objective was to describe the clinical and dermoscopic characteristics of difficult-to-diagnose melanomas (DDM). DESIGN: This study was a retrospective analysis of clinical data and dermoscopic images in a series of excised melanomas. SETTING: Cases were obtained from the database registers of three public hospitals in Barcelona (Spain), Naples (Italy), and Graz (Austria). PATIENTS: A total of 97 tumors with a main preoperative diagnosis different from melanoma and without sufficient criteria to be diagnosed clinically and dermoscopically as melanoma were studied. We studied clinical data from the patients and lesions, mean reason for excision, and consensus dermoscopic description of the lesions according to pattern analysis performed by a panel of four dermoscopists to obtain clues that allow these melanomas to be recognized. RESULTS: Ninety-three DDMs were evaluated. Three main dermoscopic categories of DDM have been identified: (1) DDMs lacking specific features (16/97), (2) DDMs simulating nonmelanocytic lesions (14/93), and (3) DDMs simulating benign melanocytic proliferations (67/93). The reasons for excision were (1) the subjective history of change referred by the patient (38% of cases), (2) the presence of clinical and/or dermoscopic "hints" for biopsy (33% of cases), and (3) the objective evidence of changes detected by digital dermoscopic follow-up (29% of cases). CONCLUSIONS: A diagnostic algorithm is proposed not to miss melanoma.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The objective was to describe the clinical and dermoscopic characteristics of difficult-to-diagnose melanomas (DDM). DESIGN: This study was a retrospective analysis of clinical data and dermoscopic images in a series of excised melanomas. SETTING: Cases were obtained from the database registers of three public hospitals in Barcelona (Spain), Naples (Italy), and Graz (Austria). PATIENTS: A total of 97 tumors with a main preoperative diagnosis different from melanoma and without sufficient criteria to be diagnosed clinically and dermoscopically as melanoma were studied. We studied clinical data from the patients and lesions, mean reason for excision, and consensus dermoscopic description of the lesions according to pattern analysis performed by a panel of four dermoscopists to obtain clues that allow these melanomas to be recognized. RESULTS: Ninety-three DDMs were evaluated. Three main dermoscopic categories of DDM have been identified: (1) DDMs lacking specific features (16/97), (2) DDMs simulating nonmelanocytic lesions (14/93), and (3) DDMs simulating benign melanocytic proliferations (67/93). The reasons for excision were (1) the subjective history of change referred by the patient (38% of cases), (2) the presence of clinical and/or dermoscopic "hints" for biopsy (33% of cases), and (3) the objective evidence of changes detected by digital dermoscopic follow-up (29% of cases). CONCLUSIONS: A diagnostic algorithm is proposed not to miss melanoma.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34848913194&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34848913194&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33264.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33264.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 17903162

AN - SCOPUS:34848913194

VL - 33

SP - 1262

EP - 1273

JO - Dermatologic Surgery

JF - Dermatologic Surgery

SN - 1076-0512

IS - 10

ER -