Mental capacity in patients involuntarily or voluntarily receiving psychiatric treatment for an acute mental disorder

Gabriele Mandarelli, Lorenzo Tarsitani, Giovanna Parmigiani, Gian M. Polselli, Paola Frati, Massimo Biondi, Stefano Ferracuti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite the growing amount of data, much information is needed on patients' mental capacity to consent to psychiatric treatment for acute mental disorders. The present study was undertaken to compare differences in capacity to consent to psychiatric treatment in patients treated voluntarily and involuntarily and to investigate the role of psychiatric symptoms, competency, and cognitive functioning in determining voluntariness of hospital admission. Involuntary patients were interviewed with the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T), the 24-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices, and their data were compared with those for age- and sex-matched voluntary patients. Involuntary patients performed worse in all MacCAT-T subscales. Capacity to consent to treatment varied widely within each group. Overall, involuntary patients have worse consent-related mental capacity than those treated voluntarily, despite capacity to consent to treatment showing a significant variability in both groups.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1002-1007
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Forensic Sciences
Volume59
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Mental Disorders
Psychiatry
Mental Competency
Therapeutics
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale
Crows
Neurobehavioral Manifestations
Mentally Ill Persons

Keywords

  • Affective disorders
  • Forensic science
  • Health care ethics
  • Informed consent
  • Mental competency
  • Schizophrenia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Genetics
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Mandarelli, G., Tarsitani, L., Parmigiani, G., Polselli, G. M., Frati, P., Biondi, M., & Ferracuti, S. (2014). Mental capacity in patients involuntarily or voluntarily receiving psychiatric treatment for an acute mental disorder. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 59(4), 1002-1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12420

Mental capacity in patients involuntarily or voluntarily receiving psychiatric treatment for an acute mental disorder. / Mandarelli, Gabriele; Tarsitani, Lorenzo; Parmigiani, Giovanna; Polselli, Gian M.; Frati, Paola; Biondi, Massimo; Ferracuti, Stefano.

In: Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 59, No. 4, 2014, p. 1002-1007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mandarelli, G, Tarsitani, L, Parmigiani, G, Polselli, GM, Frati, P, Biondi, M & Ferracuti, S 2014, 'Mental capacity in patients involuntarily or voluntarily receiving psychiatric treatment for an acute mental disorder', Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 1002-1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12420
Mandarelli, Gabriele ; Tarsitani, Lorenzo ; Parmigiani, Giovanna ; Polselli, Gian M. ; Frati, Paola ; Biondi, Massimo ; Ferracuti, Stefano. / Mental capacity in patients involuntarily or voluntarily receiving psychiatric treatment for an acute mental disorder. In: Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2014 ; Vol. 59, No. 4. pp. 1002-1007.
@article{533e63fa37aa44e1ae3afe16f7d1c994,
title = "Mental capacity in patients involuntarily or voluntarily receiving psychiatric treatment for an acute mental disorder",
abstract = "Despite the growing amount of data, much information is needed on patients' mental capacity to consent to psychiatric treatment for acute mental disorders. The present study was undertaken to compare differences in capacity to consent to psychiatric treatment in patients treated voluntarily and involuntarily and to investigate the role of psychiatric symptoms, competency, and cognitive functioning in determining voluntariness of hospital admission. Involuntary patients were interviewed with the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T), the 24-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices, and their data were compared with those for age- and sex-matched voluntary patients. Involuntary patients performed worse in all MacCAT-T subscales. Capacity to consent to treatment varied widely within each group. Overall, involuntary patients have worse consent-related mental capacity than those treated voluntarily, despite capacity to consent to treatment showing a significant variability in both groups.",
keywords = "Affective disorders, Forensic science, Health care ethics, Informed consent, Mental competency, Schizophrenia",
author = "Gabriele Mandarelli and Lorenzo Tarsitani and Giovanna Parmigiani and Polselli, {Gian M.} and Paola Frati and Massimo Biondi and Stefano Ferracuti",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1111/1556-4029.12420",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "1002--1007",
journal = "Journal of Forensic Sciences",
issn = "0022-1198",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mental capacity in patients involuntarily or voluntarily receiving psychiatric treatment for an acute mental disorder

AU - Mandarelli, Gabriele

AU - Tarsitani, Lorenzo

AU - Parmigiani, Giovanna

AU - Polselli, Gian M.

AU - Frati, Paola

AU - Biondi, Massimo

AU - Ferracuti, Stefano

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Despite the growing amount of data, much information is needed on patients' mental capacity to consent to psychiatric treatment for acute mental disorders. The present study was undertaken to compare differences in capacity to consent to psychiatric treatment in patients treated voluntarily and involuntarily and to investigate the role of psychiatric symptoms, competency, and cognitive functioning in determining voluntariness of hospital admission. Involuntary patients were interviewed with the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T), the 24-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices, and their data were compared with those for age- and sex-matched voluntary patients. Involuntary patients performed worse in all MacCAT-T subscales. Capacity to consent to treatment varied widely within each group. Overall, involuntary patients have worse consent-related mental capacity than those treated voluntarily, despite capacity to consent to treatment showing a significant variability in both groups.

AB - Despite the growing amount of data, much information is needed on patients' mental capacity to consent to psychiatric treatment for acute mental disorders. The present study was undertaken to compare differences in capacity to consent to psychiatric treatment in patients treated voluntarily and involuntarily and to investigate the role of psychiatric symptoms, competency, and cognitive functioning in determining voluntariness of hospital admission. Involuntary patients were interviewed with the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T), the 24-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices, and their data were compared with those for age- and sex-matched voluntary patients. Involuntary patients performed worse in all MacCAT-T subscales. Capacity to consent to treatment varied widely within each group. Overall, involuntary patients have worse consent-related mental capacity than those treated voluntarily, despite capacity to consent to treatment showing a significant variability in both groups.

KW - Affective disorders

KW - Forensic science

KW - Health care ethics

KW - Informed consent

KW - Mental competency

KW - Schizophrenia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903439204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903439204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1556-4029.12420

DO - 10.1111/1556-4029.12420

M3 - Article

C2 - 24502678

AN - SCOPUS:84903439204

VL - 59

SP - 1002

EP - 1007

JO - Journal of Forensic Sciences

JF - Journal of Forensic Sciences

SN - 0022-1198

IS - 4

ER -