TY - JOUR
T1 - Mentalization-Based Treatment in Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis
T2 - A Rationale and Clinical Illustration
AU - Debbané, Martin
AU - Benmiloud, Jallal
AU - Salaminios, George
AU - Solida-Tozzi, Alessandra
AU - Armando, Marco
AU - Fonagy, Peter
AU - Bateman, Anthony
PY - 2016/12/1
Y1 - 2016/12/1
N2 - Developmental clinical research in recent years has highlighted the value treating psychotic disorders at the earliest stage to reduce long-term morbidity. It is now suggested that treatment during the clinical high risk states (CHR), preceding by 1–4 years the onset of psychotic disorders, may delay or prevent the onset of psychosis, and contribute to a more positive prognosis. In this article, we wish to provide a rationale and clinical illustration of mentalization-based treatment (MBT) as an indicated preventive treatment for CHR. We will first review the notion of high-risk for psychosis, providing a trans-theoretical developmental framework for conceptualizing the clinical progression from sub-clinical towards clinical psychotic states. Second, we address the commonalities and differences between the constructs of mentalization and metacognition, and discuss their relevance in preventive psychotherapeutic treatment for CHR. Thirdly, we provide a clinical illustration of MBT to emerging psychosis. Finally, we conclude by discussing the specific contributions of MBT approach in youths at CHR, and the necessary research for evaluating its relevance in the context of risk for developing psychosis.
AB - Developmental clinical research in recent years has highlighted the value treating psychotic disorders at the earliest stage to reduce long-term morbidity. It is now suggested that treatment during the clinical high risk states (CHR), preceding by 1–4 years the onset of psychotic disorders, may delay or prevent the onset of psychosis, and contribute to a more positive prognosis. In this article, we wish to provide a rationale and clinical illustration of mentalization-based treatment (MBT) as an indicated preventive treatment for CHR. We will first review the notion of high-risk for psychosis, providing a trans-theoretical developmental framework for conceptualizing the clinical progression from sub-clinical towards clinical psychotic states. Second, we address the commonalities and differences between the constructs of mentalization and metacognition, and discuss their relevance in preventive psychotherapeutic treatment for CHR. Thirdly, we provide a clinical illustration of MBT to emerging psychosis. Finally, we conclude by discussing the specific contributions of MBT approach in youths at CHR, and the necessary research for evaluating its relevance in the context of risk for developing psychosis.
KW - Mentalizing
KW - Prevention
KW - Psychodynamic
KW - Schizophrenia
KW - Schizotypy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991273965&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991273965&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10879-016-9337-4
DO - 10.1007/s10879-016-9337-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84991273965
VL - 46
SP - 217
EP - 225
JO - Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy
JF - Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy
SN - 0022-0116
IS - 4
ER -