Meta-analysis of cancer incidence in children born after assisted reproductive technologies

S. Raimondi, P. Pedotti, E. Taioli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A meta-analysis was performed on 11 cohort studies of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) and subsequent childhood cancer, published up to February 2005, which reported comparable, nonoverlapping data, and then restricted to eight studies which presented a similar research design. The overall Standardised Incidence Ratio was 1.33 (95% CI 0.62-2.85), and 0.77 (95% CI 0.41-1.42) when the analysis was restricted to eight studies. No evidence of publication bias was observed for the overall analysis. The data are consistent with a lack of increase in risk of childhood cancer, though the amount of data on ART and cancer is still limited; larger multicentric studies as well as a pooled analysis on the available data are warranted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1053-1056
Number of pages4
JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
Volume93
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 31 2005

Fingerprint

Assisted Reproductive Techniques
Meta-Analysis
Incidence
Publication Bias
Neoplasms
Cohort Studies
Research Design

Keywords

  • Childhood chronic diseases
  • Cohort study
  • in vitro fertilisation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

Meta-analysis of cancer incidence in children born after assisted reproductive technologies. / Raimondi, S.; Pedotti, P.; Taioli, E.

In: British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 93, No. 9, 31.10.2005, p. 1053-1056.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f6d6eb9daf87476288ef63387206aacd,
title = "Meta-analysis of cancer incidence in children born after assisted reproductive technologies",
abstract = "A meta-analysis was performed on 11 cohort studies of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) and subsequent childhood cancer, published up to February 2005, which reported comparable, nonoverlapping data, and then restricted to eight studies which presented a similar research design. The overall Standardised Incidence Ratio was 1.33 (95{\%} CI 0.62-2.85), and 0.77 (95{\%} CI 0.41-1.42) when the analysis was restricted to eight studies. No evidence of publication bias was observed for the overall analysis. The data are consistent with a lack of increase in risk of childhood cancer, though the amount of data on ART and cancer is still limited; larger multicentric studies as well as a pooled analysis on the available data are warranted.",
keywords = "Childhood chronic diseases, Cohort study, in vitro fertilisation",
author = "S. Raimondi and P. Pedotti and E. Taioli",
year = "2005",
month = "10",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1038/sj.bjc.6602838",
language = "English",
volume = "93",
pages = "1053--1056",
journal = "British Journal of Cancer",
issn = "0007-0920",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meta-analysis of cancer incidence in children born after assisted reproductive technologies

AU - Raimondi, S.

AU - Pedotti, P.

AU - Taioli, E.

PY - 2005/10/31

Y1 - 2005/10/31

N2 - A meta-analysis was performed on 11 cohort studies of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) and subsequent childhood cancer, published up to February 2005, which reported comparable, nonoverlapping data, and then restricted to eight studies which presented a similar research design. The overall Standardised Incidence Ratio was 1.33 (95% CI 0.62-2.85), and 0.77 (95% CI 0.41-1.42) when the analysis was restricted to eight studies. No evidence of publication bias was observed for the overall analysis. The data are consistent with a lack of increase in risk of childhood cancer, though the amount of data on ART and cancer is still limited; larger multicentric studies as well as a pooled analysis on the available data are warranted.

AB - A meta-analysis was performed on 11 cohort studies of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) and subsequent childhood cancer, published up to February 2005, which reported comparable, nonoverlapping data, and then restricted to eight studies which presented a similar research design. The overall Standardised Incidence Ratio was 1.33 (95% CI 0.62-2.85), and 0.77 (95% CI 0.41-1.42) when the analysis was restricted to eight studies. No evidence of publication bias was observed for the overall analysis. The data are consistent with a lack of increase in risk of childhood cancer, though the amount of data on ART and cancer is still limited; larger multicentric studies as well as a pooled analysis on the available data are warranted.

KW - Childhood chronic diseases

KW - Cohort study

KW - in vitro fertilisation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27644440473&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27644440473&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602838

DO - 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602838

M3 - Article

C2 - 16234814

AN - SCOPUS:27644440473

VL - 93

SP - 1053

EP - 1056

JO - British Journal of Cancer

JF - British Journal of Cancer

SN - 0007-0920

IS - 9

ER -