Methodological demands on observational studies of outcomes after epilepsy surgery

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The short-and long-term outcome of epilepsy surgery has been mostly assessed by observational studies because experimental designs in surgical patients are often unfeasible and have ethical implications. However, observational studies have methodological limitations, which include the retrospective design, the use of referral populations, the small sample size, the enrolment of patients at differing inception points, the use of differing inclusion criteria, differing defi nitions of prognostic predictors and outcome measures, the unmasked assessment of outcome, the short follow-up, the changing technologies and surgical procedures, and the inadequate statistical methods. These limitations are incorporated in systematic reviews of epilepsy surgery studies and cannot replace well-conducted prognostic studies. Key features of these studies should include representative populations at risk, welldefi ned inception cohorts, satisfactory and complete follow-up, prospective design, and standard defi nition of prognostic factors.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLong-Term Outcomes of Epilepsy Surgery in Adults and Children
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages5-18
Number of pages14
ISBN (Print)9783319177830, 9783319177823
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Observational Studies
Epilepsy
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Sample Size
Research Design
Referral and Consultation
Technology
Population

Keywords

  • Design
  • Epilepsy
  • Methodology
  • Surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Beghi, E. (2015). Methodological demands on observational studies of outcomes after epilepsy surgery. In Long-Term Outcomes of Epilepsy Surgery in Adults and Children (pp. 5-18). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17783-0_2

Methodological demands on observational studies of outcomes after epilepsy surgery. / Beghi, Ettore.

Long-Term Outcomes of Epilepsy Surgery in Adults and Children. Springer International Publishing, 2015. p. 5-18.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Beghi, E 2015, Methodological demands on observational studies of outcomes after epilepsy surgery. in Long-Term Outcomes of Epilepsy Surgery in Adults and Children. Springer International Publishing, pp. 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17783-0_2
Beghi E. Methodological demands on observational studies of outcomes after epilepsy surgery. In Long-Term Outcomes of Epilepsy Surgery in Adults and Children. Springer International Publishing. 2015. p. 5-18 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17783-0_2
Beghi, Ettore. / Methodological demands on observational studies of outcomes after epilepsy surgery. Long-Term Outcomes of Epilepsy Surgery in Adults and Children. Springer International Publishing, 2015. pp. 5-18
@inbook{537d447f305646918e02ec2494176c24,
title = "Methodological demands on observational studies of outcomes after epilepsy surgery",
abstract = "The short-and long-term outcome of epilepsy surgery has been mostly assessed by observational studies because experimental designs in surgical patients are often unfeasible and have ethical implications. However, observational studies have methodological limitations, which include the retrospective design, the use of referral populations, the small sample size, the enrolment of patients at differing inception points, the use of differing inclusion criteria, differing defi nitions of prognostic predictors and outcome measures, the unmasked assessment of outcome, the short follow-up, the changing technologies and surgical procedures, and the inadequate statistical methods. These limitations are incorporated in systematic reviews of epilepsy surgery studies and cannot replace well-conducted prognostic studies. Key features of these studies should include representative populations at risk, welldefi ned inception cohorts, satisfactory and complete follow-up, prospective design, and standard defi nition of prognostic factors.",
keywords = "Design, Epilepsy, Methodology, Surgery",
author = "Ettore Beghi",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-17783-0_2",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319177830",
pages = "5--18",
booktitle = "Long-Term Outcomes of Epilepsy Surgery in Adults and Children",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Methodological demands on observational studies of outcomes after epilepsy surgery

AU - Beghi, Ettore

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - The short-and long-term outcome of epilepsy surgery has been mostly assessed by observational studies because experimental designs in surgical patients are often unfeasible and have ethical implications. However, observational studies have methodological limitations, which include the retrospective design, the use of referral populations, the small sample size, the enrolment of patients at differing inception points, the use of differing inclusion criteria, differing defi nitions of prognostic predictors and outcome measures, the unmasked assessment of outcome, the short follow-up, the changing technologies and surgical procedures, and the inadequate statistical methods. These limitations are incorporated in systematic reviews of epilepsy surgery studies and cannot replace well-conducted prognostic studies. Key features of these studies should include representative populations at risk, welldefi ned inception cohorts, satisfactory and complete follow-up, prospective design, and standard defi nition of prognostic factors.

AB - The short-and long-term outcome of epilepsy surgery has been mostly assessed by observational studies because experimental designs in surgical patients are often unfeasible and have ethical implications. However, observational studies have methodological limitations, which include the retrospective design, the use of referral populations, the small sample size, the enrolment of patients at differing inception points, the use of differing inclusion criteria, differing defi nitions of prognostic predictors and outcome measures, the unmasked assessment of outcome, the short follow-up, the changing technologies and surgical procedures, and the inadequate statistical methods. These limitations are incorporated in systematic reviews of epilepsy surgery studies and cannot replace well-conducted prognostic studies. Key features of these studies should include representative populations at risk, welldefi ned inception cohorts, satisfactory and complete follow-up, prospective design, and standard defi nition of prognostic factors.

KW - Design

KW - Epilepsy

KW - Methodology

KW - Surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943411787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84943411787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-17783-0_2

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-17783-0_2

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84943411787

SN - 9783319177830

SN - 9783319177823

SP - 5

EP - 18

BT - Long-Term Outcomes of Epilepsy Surgery in Adults and Children

PB - Springer International Publishing

ER -